As Google Maps Renames Neighborhoods, Residents Fume

Before the internet era, neighborhood names developed via word of mouth, newspaper articles and physical maps that were released periodically. But Google Maps, which debuted in 2005, is updated continuously and delivered to more than one billion people on their devices. Google also feeds map data to thousands of websites and apps, magnifying its influence.

In May, more than 63 percent of people who accessed a map on a smartphone or tablet used Google Maps, versus 19.4 percent for the Chinese internet giant Alibaba’s maps and 5.5 percent for Apple Maps, according to comScore, which tracks web traffic.

Google said it created its maps from third-party data, public sources, satellites and, often most important, users. People can submit changes, which are reviewed by Google employees. A Google spokeswoman declined further comment.

Yet some submissions are ruled upon by people with little local knowledge of a place, such as contractors in India, said one former Google Maps employee, who declined to be named because he was not authorized to speak publicly. Other users with a history of accurate changes said their updates to maps take effect instantly.

Many of Google’s decisions have far-reaching consequences, with the maps driving increased traffic to quiet neighborhoods and once almost provoking an international incident in 2010 after it misrepresented the boundary between Costa Rica and Nicaragua.

The service has also disseminated place names that are just plain puzzling. In New York, Vinegar Hill Heights, Midtown South Central (now NoMad), BoCoCa (for the area between Boerum Hill, Cobble Hill and Carroll Gardens), and Rambo (Right Around the Manhattan Bridge Overpass) have appeared on and off in Google Maps.

Article source: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/02/technology/google-maps-neighborhood-names.html

Posted in SF Bay Area News | Tagged | Leave a comment

Forget San Francisco. These two Bay Area cities have the most competitive markets


  • d17c5 920x920 Forget San Francisco. These two Bay Area cities have the most competitive markets

Caption

Close

Compete Score data, via Redfin

Compete Score data, via Redfin

Photo: Redfin


Compete Score data, via Redfin

Compete Score data, via Redfin

Photo: Redfin


Compete Score data, via Redfin

Compete Score data, via Redfin

Photo: Redfin


This San Jose home, via Redfin, listed for $749.999K June 5, went pending, June 15, and sold for 8.7K mid-July.

This San Jose home, via Redfin, listed for $749.999K June 5, went pending, June 15, and sold for 8.7K mid-July.

Photo: Redfin



This San Jose home, via Redfin, listed for $749.999K June 5, went pending, June 15, and sold for 8.7K mid-July.

This San Jose home, via Redfin, listed for $749.999K June 5, went pending, June 15, and sold for 8.7K mid-July.

Photo: Redfin



This Fremont home, via Redfin, listed for $850K June 12, went pending June 21, and sold in July for $935K

This Fremont home, via Redfin, listed for $850K June 12, went pending June 21, and sold in July for $935K

Photo: Redfin









This San Jose Home, via Redfin, listed at $725K in May, went pending two weeks later, and sold in July for $915K.

This San Jose Home, via Redfin, listed at $725K in May, went pending two weeks later, and sold in July for $915K.

Photo: Redfin






No surprises here. Four Bay Area cities fall in a list of the 10 most competitive real estate markets. Real estate website Redfin developed a new Compete Score and analyzed American cities with populations of 200,000 or more to determine where the market competition is stiffest.

In the topmost spots: San Jose, Fremont, Oakland, and San Francisco. Sacramento also made the list.

The data

Redfin’s Compete Score ranges from 0 to 100, with 100 being the most competitive.

To calculate the figure, Redfin uses data from its site, including:

  • The number of competing offers and number of waived contingencies for homes sold by Redfin
  • Data from multiple listing services (MLSs), including the sale-to-list price ratio and number of days on market
  • Monthly updates to track competition over time to compare competition in different neighborhoods and cities



Knives out

According to these data, Fremont, San Jose and Seattle are the most competitive U.S. cities for homebuyers. In fact, on the score scale of 0 to 100, each of those cities scored a perfect 100.

For those who still hold out an “escape to the East Bay” fantasy, it might be saddening to learn Oakland is actually more competitive than S.F., by these numbers– though admittedly, not by much.

Redfin explains:

“Many of the most competitive cities are tech hubs that have attracted an influx of people moving to the area for jobs, unmatched by the creation of new homes. This has led to intense competition and rising home prices. In San Francisco, Seattle and Denver, homes have become so expensive that many people are moving elsewhere in search of more affordable and less competitive housing markets.”

Elsewhere, like… Oakland, or in the case of San Jose… Fremont.

It is not unusual in these competitive markets for homes to go into contract within a week, with multiple offers, and well over asking.

The gallery above denotes the 10 most difficult markets, as well as showcases sold homes that capture the true fierceness of the top three markets.

Buyer’s markets do exist

Those seeking reprieve from the hottest housing markets may want to consider the least competitive cities.

The gallery above includes that list, but the three least difficult markets are in New Orleans, El Paso, and Pittsburg. These cities earned a 43, 44, and 47 score, respectively, using Redfin’s analysis.

What does this look like for a buyer? In New Orleans, it looks like a six-week to two-month stint for a home on the market, which eventually closes with two or three competing offers, rarely over asking.

Want to know more about why your offer never gets accepted in the Bay Area, or where it might be more appreciated? Read the full study here. 

ALSO, A stately home on a huge San Francisco lot asking $1.9 million

Anna Marie Erwert writes from both the renter and new buyer perspective, having (finally) achieved both statuses. She focuses on national real estate trends, specializing in the San Francisco Bay Area and Pacific Northwest. Follow Anna on Twitter: @AnnaMarieErwert 

Article source: https://www.sfgate.com/realestate/article/Bay-Areas-most-Competitive-real-estate-markets-13106103.php

Posted in SF Bay Area News | Tagged | Leave a comment

‘Game of Thrones’ castle for sale is cheaper than a house in San Francisco

2b597 got 1533118716048 50313131 ver1.0 640 360 Game of Thrones castle for sale is cheaper than a house in San FranciscoCopyright 2018 Nexstar Broadcasting, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Gosford Castle in Northern Ireland / Maison Real Estate



SAN FRANCISCO (KRON) – If you’re a “Game of Thrones” fan in the Bay Area, we’ve got some good news for you! 

A castle that was featured in the show is up for sale, and it’s actually pretty reasonably priced — much more affordable than a typical home in the Bay Area, believe it or not. 

Riverrun, which is part of the House Tully stronghold, is up for sale in Northern Ireland. 

Gosford Castle, which was featured in GoT Season 3, was built in the mid-1800s and boasts more than 15 bedrooms and 10 bathrooms. 

Masion Real Estate divides the castle into six luxury apartments, each spanning 3,500 square feet. 

It also has quite a bit of history to it. According to Maison Real Estate, the castle was first occupied by the Earls of Gosford until 1921. It was then commandeered during the Second World War and used to house troops. 

Following the war, the castle was sold to the Ministry of Agriculture then fell back into military ownership before converting to a hotel in 1983. 

Starting price for the castle is £500,000, which is equivalent to around $656,452.

Seriously.

 

Article source: https://www.wric.com/news/weird-news/-game-of-thrones-castle-for-sale-is-cheaper-than-a-house-in-san-francisco/1338323912

Posted in SF Bay Area News | Tagged | Leave a comment

San Francisco Bay Area June home sales fall to the lowest point in 4 years as prices surge to record levels

<!– –>



c4573 103408149 GettyImages 502924680.530x298 San Francisco Bay Area June home sales fall to the lowest point in 4 years as prices surge to record levels

Record high home prices are taking their toll even on a market that is used to pricey properties. June sales of both newly built and existing homes in the San Francisco Bay Area dropped just more than 9 percent compared with a year ago, according to CoreLogic.

The survey covers both single-family homes and condominiums in Alameda, Contra Costa, Marin, Napa, Santa Clara, San Francisco, San Mateo, Solano and Sonoma counties.

“Last month’s home sales were the lowest for June in four years, and the year-over-year drop in the total number of transactions was the largest in 14 months,” said Andrew LePage, a CoreLogic analyst. “A portion of last month’s year-over-year sales decline reflects one less business day for recording deals this June. But affordability and inventory constraints are likely the main culprits in last month’s sales slowdown.”

The median price of a Bay Area home sold in June hit $875,000, up 12.9 percent compared with June 2017. That is the highest price on record. Annual price gains over the last six months were twice what they were a year ago, reflecting high demand and low supply of homes for sale.

“Price growth is only part of the problem that home shoppers have faced,” LePage said. “The median price paid for a Bay Area home this June was up almost 13 percent year over year, but the principal-and-interest mortgage payment on that median-priced home was up about 22 percent because of the rise in mortgage rates – more than half a percentage point – over the past year.”



76321 105347158 GettyImages 683859834.600x400 San Francisco Bay Area June home sales fall to the lowest point in 4 years as prices surge to record levels


Northern California appears to be going through the same problem as the state’s southern half, which saw a dramatic drop in June home sales as well. Additionally noteworthy is that these numbers include sales of newly built homes.

California building permits for single-family homes have been rising sizably and steadily over the past year, according to the California Department of Finance. More supply should translate to more sales, but, again, high prices and higher interest rates are hitting affordability hard.

Bay Area home sales fell annually in all counties except San Francisco. Sales there increased 2.4 percent. San Francisco had the highest median home price of all Bay Area counties at $1,341,000 in June, an increase of 7.3 percent annually.

Sales of newly built Bay Area homes were nearly 32 percent below the historical average, going back to 1988. Much of that is because the homebuilding recovery is still ongoing and housing starts are still below average.

Sales of existing homes, even factoring out the boom years from 2003 to 2006, when risky loans fueled the market, were 7.6 percent below the long-term average for June.



76321 105018123 Rent Buy Thumbnail.600x400 San Francisco Bay Area June home sales fall to the lowest point in 4 years as prices surge to record levels


76321 104006269 OLICK D  230 RGB.60x60 San Francisco Bay Area June home sales fall to the lowest point in 4 years as prices surge to record levels

Playing

Share this video…

Watch Next…

Posted in SF Bay Area News | Tagged | Leave a comment

A home you can afford: How land trusts are changing Bay Area home ownership

(CLICK HERE, if you are unable to view this photo gallery on your mobile device.)

A year ago, Norma Sanchez and Ambrocio Carrera were on the verge of losing their East Oakland home — staring down a massive rent hike and with no hope of affording a new place close to their jobs or their three sons’ schools.

Now, thanks to an innovative strategy gaining traction in the Bay Area, not only did the family stay put, they’re on their way to owning that home.

“It’s very emotional,” Carrera said in Spanish. “It’s something that, in the beginning, you don’t believe. But here we are.”

Sanchez and Carrera held onto their home with the help of a community land trust — an organization that buys up residential properties, keeps ownership of the ground beneath the buildings and then rents or sells the units back to low-income residents at a discount. It’s an unusual strategy that does two things traditional government-subsidized affordable housing does not — it guarantees the property will remain affordable forever, and it gives residents the chance to build equity in their home.

As soaring prices continue to squeeze Bay Area renters, leaving both cities and affordable-housing advocates desperate for solutions, community land trusts are becoming an increasingly attractive option. There are at least seven operating in the Bay Area, including in Oakland, San Francisco, East Palo Alto and Sonoma County. And though the average resident likely hasn’t heard of the wonky concept, the trusts have secured affordable housing for dozens of families.

“There is really a resurgent interest in this model, because we see that so many other approaches are not really measurably moving the needle in terms of the crisis,” said Steve King, executive director of the Oakland Community Land Trust, which bought Carrera’s and Sanchez’s house.

Separating the house from the land under it is a key piece of the land trust strategy because it acts as a safeguard to ensure the property can never again be sold at market rate. Instead, if the owners decide to sell, they go through the land trust, which sets a price that keeps the unit affordable for the next low-income family.

“It’s sort of this rearrangement or this reconfiguration of what property ownership really means,” King said.

The Oakland Community Land Trust received $974,150 from the city earlier this year and also pulls in funding from foundations, banks and other sources. Since 2010, the trust has purchased 20 single-family homes, two mixed-use buildings and one seven-unit live-work building.

“The city thinks very highly of community land trusts,” said Darin Ranelletti, Oakland’s policy director for housing security — a role Mayor Libby Schaaf created this year to address the housing shortage. “We think that they’re a great model.”

On the other side of the Bay, the San Francisco Community Land Trust controls 13 properties, including one across the street from the Transamerica Pyramid. Residents of that 21-unit apartment building each pay a $10,000 deposit, plus monthly mortgage payments, to own a stake in their building.

“It’s one of the very few tools we have to provide a way to home ownership for the very low-income folks of San Francisco,” said Tyler Macmillan, the land trust’s organizational director.

The Housing Land Trust of Sonoma County, which houses nearly 80 families, is an official part of the local government’s affordable-housing strategy. When new low-income units are built, cities hand them over to the land trust, which then sells them to low-income residents at an affordable price.

Land trust fever has spread to East Palo Alto as well, where former Mayor Duane Bay is launching the Pahali Community Land Trust. He’s working on buying three properties — two single-family homes and a vacant lot where he hopes to build townhouses.

For 41-year-old Sanchez, who works cleaning homes in San Jose, and 45-year-old Carrera, who works at a Togo’s in Pleasanton, the Oakland land trust saved their two-bedroom home. Last August their landlord, Steve Kalmbach, notified them he intended to double their rent — raising it from $1,200 to $2,400. Under California’s Costa Hawkins law — which voters will decide whether to repeal in November — single-family homes are exempt from rent control.

Sanchez and Carrera fought back with protests and petitions, and the rent hike was put on hold. But then the landlord began making plans to sell the property, leading them to fear they would be kicked out by the new owner. They began trying to convince Kalmbach to sell to the Oakland Community Land Trust. After a year of contentious negotiations — which included the family picketing Kalmbach’s Piedmont home on Halloween, and Sanchez and Carrera’s 15-year-old son, Jonatan, putting his fist through the “For Sale” sign in the front yard in a moment of despair — Kalmbach agreed to sell for $335,000. He could not be reached for comment.

Now the family pays $1,800 a month in rent to the land trust, and in a few years they’ll have the option to funnel some of that money toward a down payment. They pay $50 a month to lease the land under the home from the land trust.

When 28-year-old Javier Prescott first heard about land trusts, he was reluctantly considering moving to Oregon with his fiance to start a family because they couldn’t afford to buy a home in the Bay Area. A Sonoma County native, Prescott works as lead custodian for the county’s Office of Education, and his fiance is a bartender studying to be a nurse.

This year, they did something they never thought they’d be able to do — they bought a house in Petaluma for $323,000 with the help of the Housing Land Trust of Sonoma County. They pay $2,197 for the mortgage — about 25 percent of their combined incomes — plus $90 a month to lease the ground under the house.

“Oh my God, you don’t even understand how amazing it feels to be a homeowner in Sonoma County,” Prescott said. “The housing market is just so overwhelming, that someone my age — it’s not even a thought.”

If they sell the house, the price will be tied to the area’s median income gains, not the housing market’s fluctuations. So if the median income in Sonoma County rose 10 percent, for example, they could sell the house for 10 percent more than what they paid.

Prescott doesn’t mind not making a windfall.

“Since I was kind of gifted with this awesome situation, I don’t really have any kind of issue paying it forward,” he said.

The community land trust model also can prevent small businesses from being displaced.

When the owner of a mixed-use building on 23rd Avenue in East Oakland decided to sell, the tenants raised $90,000 during an eight-week crowd-funding campaign — enough for a down payment. The Oakland land trust put that money toward buying the building in April and now is training the residents to manage the property themselves, as a collective, with the idea that their rent payments will become mortgage payments in about 10 years.

Now the residents — which include families and individuals, as well as nonprofits renting office space — are figuring out how to do everything from fix sinks to conduct safety audits of fire extinguishers. The former was a skill they needed almost as soon as they signed the contract, said Devi Peacock, founder of Peacock Rebellion — a queer and trans arts and culture group that rents space in the building.

“It was so emotional, because we’re like, ‘Oh my God we signed,’ and then almost right away a sink broke,” Peacock said. “We cheered. Because you know what? It was like our problem now. And what a thrilling feeling.”

Article source: https://www.mercurynews.com/2018/07/30/a-home-you-can-afford-how-land-trusts-are-changing-bay-area-home-ownership/

Posted in SF Bay Area News | Tagged | Leave a comment