How San Francisco’s Wealthiest Families Launched Kamala Harris

Michael Kruse is a senior staff writer for Politico.

SAN FRANCISCO—In the summer of 1999, in the monied Napa Valley north of here, a bejeweled bride rode sidesaddle on a speckled horse into what the press would label “the Bay Area’s version of an outdoor royal wedding.” The lavish nuptials of Vanessa Jarman and oil heir Billy Getty—replete with red carpet, hundreds of flickering votives, and “a fair amount of wine,” according to one deadpan attendee—featured a 168-person guest list stocked with socialites and scions, philanthropists and other assorted glitterati.

This coterie of the chosen included, as well, a 34-year-old prosecutor who was all of a year and a half into her job in the San Francisco district attorney’s office. And she wasn’t just some celebrity’s all but anonymous plus-one. She was featured in the photo coverage of the hot-ticket affair, smiling wide, decked out in a dark gown with a drink in hand.

Story Continued Below

“Kamala Harris,” the caption read, “cruised through the reception.”

Well before she was a United States senator, or the attorney general of California, Harris was already in with the in-crowd here. From 1994, when she was introduced splashily in the region’s most popular newspaper column as the paramour of one of the state’s most powerful politicians, to 2003, when she was elected district attorney, the Oakland- and Berkeley-bred Harris charted the beginnings of her ascent in the more fashionable crucible of San Francisco. In Pacific Heights parlors and bastions of status and wealth, in trendy hot spots, and in the juicy, dishy missives of the variety of gossip columns that chronicled the city’s elite, Kamala Harris was a boldface name.

Born and raised in more diverse, far less affluent neighborhoods on the other side of the Bay, Harris was the oldest daughter of immigrant parents, reared in a family that was intellectual but not privileged or rich. As a presidential contender, running against opponents who openly disdain elites and big money, she has emphasized not only her reputation as a take-no-prisoners prosecutor but also the humbleness of her roots—a child of civil rights activism, of busing, “so proud,” as she said at the start of her speech announcing her candidacy, “to be a child of Oakland.”

Her rise, however, was propelled in and by a very different milieu. In this less explored piece of her past, Harris used as a launching pad the tightly knit world of San Francisco high society, navigating early on this rarefied world of influence and opulence, charming and partying with movers and shakers—ably cultivating relationships with VIPs who would become friends and also backers and donors of every one of her political campaigns, tapping into deep pockets and becoming a popular figure in a small world dominated by a handful of powerful families. This stratum of San Francisco remains a profoundly important part of her network—including not just powerful Democratic donors but an ambassador appointed by President Donald Trump who ran in the same circles.

Harris, now 54, often has talked about the importance of having “a seat at the table,” of being an insider instead of an outsider. And she learned that skill in this crowded, incestuous, famously challenging political proving ground, where she worked to score spots at the some of the city’s most sought-after tables. In the mid- to late ’90s and into the aughts, the correspondents who kept tabs on the comings and goings of the area’s A-listers noted where Harris was and what she was doing and who she was with. As she advanced professionally, jumping from Alameda County to posts in the offices of the district and city attorneys across the Bay, she was a trustee, too, of the museum of modern art and active in causes concerning AIDS and the prevention of domestic abuse, and out and about at fashion shows and cocktail parties and galas and get-togethers at the most modish boutiques. She was, in the breezy, buzzy parlance of these kinds of columns, one of the “Pretty Thangs.” She was a “rising star.” She was “rather perfect.” And she mingled with “spiffy and powerful friends” who were her contemporaries as well as their even more influential mothers and fathers. All this was fun, but it wasn’t unserious. It was seeing and being seen with a purpose, society activity with political utility.

Because three years after the Getty wedding, in mid-2002, Harris called Mark Buell. She knew him because Harris was friends with his stepdaughter, Summer Tompkins Walker, the daughter of Susie Tompkins Buell, the major Democratic donor. Harris told him she wanted to run for district attorney. At first, Buell was skeptical, he said recently when we got together for dinner at an old Union Square haunt called Sam’s; he considered Harris “a socialite with a law degree,” he explained over salmon and sauvignon blanc. The more Harris talked, though, the more impressed he became. By the end of their conversation, Buell offered to be her finance chair. His first piece of advice: To knock off an incumbent in what would be a nasty, three-candidate fight, Harris was going to need to raise an early, eye-popping amount of money. Buell saw her friends, people he knew, too, as an asset to deploy. “So we put together a finance committee that primarily was young socialite ladies,” he told me. The group included Vanessa Getty, by then one of Harris’ closest pals, and Susan Swig—head-turning surnames in the city’s choicest circles. Buell’s directive: “I said, ‘No one has ever raised more than $150,000 for a D.A.’s race, totally. I want this group to raise $100,000 by the first reporting period.”

Outfitted in sharp designer suits and strands of bright pearls, Harris kickstarted her drive to become San Francisco’s top cop—in its ritziest, most prestigious locale. Predominantly white Pacific Heights—hills upon hills, gobsmacking views of the Golden Gate strait, mansions built and bought with both new tech money and old gold rush cash—is home to Nancy Pelosi, Dianne Feinstein, Gavin Newsom and others, one of the country’s foremost concentrations of politicians and their patrons. Including the Buells. In late 2002, this became the campaign routine, Buell recalled: “Thirty to 50 people in a room … cocktails … a nice introduction by the host.”

And then?

“Kamala would make her pitch.”

And then?

“We’d go around with the bag and collect the money.”

“A well-qualified prosecutor with a lot of ties to the Pacific Heights crowd, Harris should have no trouble raising money,” the San Francisco Chronicle noted that November, and so it was: By the close of the calendar year, Harris had raised $100,560—nearly 23 percent of which came from the three ZIP codes of Pacific Heights. It’s a roster of early donors that reads like a who’s who of the city. “That crowd really got her started to be taken seriously,” Buell said.

These people who seeded the start of Harris’ political career got something in return as well. “You always had the feeling that she was going somewhere,” Dede Wilsey told me. Wilsey is a stalwart fundraiser and a philanthropist, the widow of real estate bigwig Alfred Wilsey, and a Republican who nonetheless is a Harris supporter and friend. “You might want to go along for that ride, too.”

Harris, whose campaign did not respond to a request for comment for this story, put her headquarters in the Bayview, a poor neighborhood six or so miles south of Pacific Heights and a world away, and she would earn the backing of a swath of the city’s black, Chinese and LGBT leaders. But in January of 2003, she also was on the cover of the Nob Hill Gazette, the monthly paper of record of San Francisco society—one of the faces in a collage of people deemed to be the crème de la crème.

Harris, said the Gazette, “may be our next D.A.”

Eleven months later, it was true.

***

“… Kamala Harris, an Alameda Co. deputy D.A. who is something new in Willie’s love life,” Herb Caen wrote in his column in the San Francisco Chronicle on March 22, 1994, making public her romantic relationship with Willie Brown, who was still married (albeit long estranged), 30 years older than Harris and by then approaching a decade and a half into his unprecedented reign as speaker of the California State Assembly. “She’s a woman, not a girl,” Caen continued in his signature three-dot style. “And she’s black …” Beyond the wince-worthy language, it’s hard to imagine in that time and space a more spotlit debut.

Caen, for his part, was at the tail end of a nonpareil, nearly 60-year career. Six days a week, he two-finger-typed a thousand or so of the most-read words in San Francisco. “If he put your name in boldface, you’d get calls from everyone you knew saying, ‘I saw you in Herb Caen today,’” Jesse Hamlin, one of his former assistants, told me. “If your name wasn’t in there, you weren’t anybody,” longtime local press agent Lee Houskeeper added. In his columns, Caen called Harris “attractive, intelligent and charming.” He called her a “steadying influence” for Brown. And in December of 1995, when Brown was elected mayor, Caen called her the “first-lady-in-waiting.”

Brown, meanwhile, was one of Caen’s best friends, and his mayoralty would cap a lengthy career in which he proved to be one of the shrewder getters, keepers and users of political power of the last half of the 20th century. The dapper, hyper-connected bon vivant and unashamed showman wore pricey Brioni suits and drove fast, fancy cars. Brown didn’t want to talk to me for this story, but he once wrote: “Being able to cross over into the white community is essential for any black, female or male, to succeed as a political figure. I suggest black women lay the groundwork by looking to become active on the boards of social, cultural and, charitable institutions like symphonies, museums, and hospitals. It’s the way to get respect from a world that otherwise is content to eschew or label you. You have to demand the opportunities to enter these worlds.”

It’s hard to think honestly about the origins of the rise of Harris without grappling with the reality of the role of Brown. He helped her. He put her on a pair of state boards that required not much work and paid her more than $400,000 across five years on top of her salary as a prosecutor. He gave her a BMW. He helped her, too, though, in a way that was less immediately material but arguably far more enduringly important.

“Brown, of course, was the darling of the well-to-do set, if you will,” veteran political consultant Jack Davis, who managed Brown’s mayoral campaign, told me. “And she was the girlfriend, and so she met, you know, everybody who’s anybody, as a result of being his girl.”

“I met her through Willie,” John Burton, the former San Francisco congressman and chairman of the California Democratic Party, said in an interview. “I would think it’s fair to say that most of the people in San Francisco met her through Willie.”

“He was the guy that put her right in the ballgame,” said Dan Addario, the chief investigator for the district attorney whom Harris ultimately would topple.

“He made her,” Davis said.

Many people bristle at this, castigating such sentiments as tired, sexist and racist, rightly pointing out that Brown dispensed favors and counsel to hundreds of aspiring politicians and only one of them is currently a U.S. senator running for president near the head of the heap.

“Look,” Rebecca Prozan, Harris’ campaign manager in 2003, told me, “those of us that want to be in public service in an elected capacity can be used by people who are in public office, taken around town, and there’s a whole host of us that have had that opportunity, and it didn’t work out for us. There has to also be something special about her.”

“Kamala Harris was plenty capable of impressing anyone she met … all on her own,” said P.J. Johnston, a consultant in San Francisco and a former Brown press secretary, “and did so frequently.”

Harris broke up with Brown shortly after he won the election to be mayor. “She ended it,” Brown told Joan Walsh, writing for San Francisco magazine in 2003, “because she concluded there was no permanency in our relationship, and she was absolutely right.” But in the society and gossip columns in the Chronicle, in the San Francisco Examiner and in the Nob Hill Gazette, her mentions didn’t go down. They ticked up.

When she was still a deputy D.A. in Oakland, Harris joined the board of trustees of the Museum of Modern Art in San Francisco. She was a member of the San Francisco Jazz Organization. She was a patron dinner chair for the San Francisco Symphony’s annual Black White Ball. She was the executive director of the San Francisco Domestic Violence Consortium, and she was president of the board of directors of Partners Ending Domestic Abuse. She was on the board of a nonprofit called Women Count. “Few women,” gushed the Gazette, “are more involved than (equally glamorous) attorney Kamala Harris.” In the outlet distributed specifically to the neighborhoods of the rich, she was featured in a fashion spread, shown wearing $565 boots, a $975 skirt and a $1,095 coat, all made by Burberry. In the descriptions of P.J. Corkery of the Examiner—who also ghost-wrote Brown’s book—Harris was “super-chic” and “super-smart” and “drop-dead elegant” and “very visible.” She was seen at Harry Denton’s Starlight Room. She was seen at Jeannette Etheredge’s Tosca. She went to a ball to benefit local arts museums at which celebrity event planner Stanlee Gatti’s elaborate set-up incorporated centerpieces of large balls of ice—and was spotted “sometime around midnight” trying to bowl the frosty orbs with Gavin Newsom, who was then a city supervisor as well as a friend and business partner of the Gettys. She went to the 25th anniversary showing of San Francisco’s “Beach Blanket Babylon” and was spotted slipping out of the afterparty for a dinner at Jardinière with Willie Brown and high society grande dame Denise Hale. She went to a Ricky Martin concert in a limo with Hale and Denton and scenester Harry de Wildt. She went to the parties of haute couture clothier Wilkes Bashford. She went to ladies’ luncheons at Pacific Heights homes. She had Sunday dinners with the Gettys.

“For society—and I hate that word—for things to continue to be exciting and interesting,” Vanessa Getty once told Vanity Fair, “circles have to keep expanding.”

“A lot of people think, ‘Those people are too rich for me, I can’t be part of their world—they’re out of my fucking league,’” a Harris friend said later in San Francisco magazine. Harris clearly didn’t think that. “She just kept showing up.”

By 2002, at the start of her campaign for D.A., she showed her packed, jumbled, leather-bound Filofax to Andrea Dew Steele, who was working at the time as Susie Tompkins Buell’s political and philanthropic adviser. Harris had organized her contacts in an inefficient and outdated way, Steele told me, but the list itself was formidable. “Definitely,” she said.

Recently, in the sitting room in the Pacific Heights house of socialite-turned-attorney Sharon Owsley, I visited with Owsley as well as Debbie Mesloh, a longtime Harris friend, and we talked about these inroads Harris was able to make.

“Kamala also comes from, you know, kind of an intellectually established family,” Mesloh said.

Owsley agreed. “A very fine family,” she said. “Her mother was east Indian and came to this country and became a renowned scientist, and her father came to this country and became a professor of economics. So, she has, you know, the genealogy to move in any circles. But I also have to emphasize that … you don’t need that—but she had it all right.”

The support from the crowds in the homes on the hills was the fuel, and Harris took it from there. She pulled in campaign contributions from “every ZIP code in the city,” she emphasized to W magazine—and the share of her contributions from Pacific Heights got progressively smaller through 2003, down to 21 percent from January to June, 19 from July to September, 13 from October to November and 12 percent from November to December. “I walk very comfortably in a lot of communities in this city,” Harris told the Chronicle as her campaign crescendoed. The newspaper endorsed her in October, saying she had “shown an ability to work with neighborhood groups from the Bayview to Pacific Heights—in essence, all of San Francisco.” Said Buell when we met: “That’s part of Kamala’s gift, I think, is that she can go into a room in any part of town, and she can act appropriate to that room.” There remained, though, no question which candidate San Francisco high society was behind. Joining those donors who maxed out at $500 before the end of 2002 (Bashford, Gatti, Billy and Vanessa Getty, Summer Tompkins Walker, Susan Swig, Steven Swig, Darian Swig, Mary Swig, Marjorie Swig, Roselyne “Cissie” Swig, and Ann Moller Caen, Herb Caen’s widow) now were Wilsey, her son Trevor Traina, toy tycoon John Bowes, Frances Bowes, Ann Getty, Peter Getty, George and Charlotte Mailliard Shultz, in addition to a slate of Fishers (founders of the Gap) and Schwabs (as in Charles).

“You have to have your feet in a lot of different communities in order to win citywide office in San Francisco. It is by no means enough,” Jim Stearns, a top strategist on the ’03 Harris campaign, said of Pacific Heights. “It is just, you know—it is helpful in that it is a good community to raise money out of, and it is a good community to get some visibility.”

“The challenge with San Francisco politics, even more then than now, is that almost everybody agrees with everybody else on everything,” said Dan Schnur, a longtime Republican-turned-independent political operative who worked at the highest levels of state and presidential politics and lived in San Francisco from 1995 to 2002. “Up-and-comers are less likely to distinguish themselves by policy differences than the way they navigate these political-cultural-philanthropic-community circles.”

“Particularly with candidates of color, you know, often they don’t have those kinds of networks,” Steele said, “so this was very, very important for her success … to have some funding stream for her first race, and subsequent races.”

Harris had put in the work.

“I could have met Kamala through Sharon,” Wilsey said. “I could have met her through Ann Getty, I could have met her through, you know, any one of those people.”

“We had mutual friends,” Cissie Swig told me. “If she was born in Oakland, she found her niche, perhaps, in San Francisco, and her expertise and her smarts served her well when she decided to come and be in San Francisco,” she added.

“She has a presence,” Owsley said. “She has a star quality.”

An “aura,” Wilsey added.

“Her strength. Her determination,” Frances Bowes said when I asked her what had attracted her to Harris. “She’s not scared of anybody.”

“Why shouldn’t we have a fabulous D.A. like that?” Owsley asked.

“I think it started with the fact that people wanted to be able to say they’d met her and were supporting her because of this quasi-social network that we started with, and the more she raised, and the more she got traction, the more everybody else wanted to say they heard her, they talked to her, and were supportive,” Buell told me when we met for dinner. “I have to be careful here, because I still live in this town, but they were kind of professional socialites, and they wanted to help her. They saw it as a two-way street.”

***

This past spring, at a 2020 fundraiser at the house of one of her Pacific Heights neighbors, Dede Wilsey wanted to talk to Kamala Harris.

To thank her.

“She was very, very helpful,” Wilsey told me when I reached her in Newport, Rhode Island, where she’s been summering, “when my son was recently appointed ambassador to Austria. … And I said, ‘Kamala, I really wanted to be sure to come to this because I wanted to thank you for being so nice to Trevor.’ And she said it was the right thing to do. And I said, ‘But, Kamala, people don’t always do the right thing. And I want you to know how much I appreciate it.’”

The next day, I reached Traina, President Donald Trump’s pick to be the U.S. ambassador to Austria, in Vienna, where he’s been based since last May.

“Kamala is an old friend,” Traina told me. “We all kind of grew up together, you know, Gavin, Kamala and many others.”

He supported her when she was running for D.A. “And she was very nice and very supportive of me when I was going through my Senate confirmation process. And she was one of a number of different senators who put in a good word for me with the staffs at the Foreign Relations Committee, which I really appreciated. That was nice of her. And I think the proof was in the pudding because I was unanimously confirmed by the Senate.”

He, too, was at that Napa Valley Getty wedding, back in 1999.

“Great party,” he said.

Chris Cadelago contributed to this report.

More from POLITICO Magazine

Article source: https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2019/08/09/kamala-harris-2020-president-profile-san-francisco-elite-227611

Posted in SF Bay Area News | Tagged | Leave a comment

Besides broker tours, how can agents introduce other Realtors to their new listings?


  • c2452 920x920 Besides broker tours, how can agents introduce other Realtors to their new listings?

  •  Besides broker tours, how can agents introduce other Realtors to their new listings?

Caption

Close


A: There are several options that immediately come to mind:

• Social media posts and advertising

• Top Agent Network

Other platforms like Rezora and RealScout But these are among the most common methods used by agents.

Hosting a “Coming soon” brokers’ tour prior to going on market, directly calling other Realtors and sending email campaigns are also effective means of advertising a listing.

Given the lack of inventory, these methods are not only more common, but essential to a more strategic approach to your business. I would refer to a piece by Jess Lenouvel, “The Listing Lab”. The elements of the lab are relevancy, omnipresence, and intimacy. Relevancy is having the right message to the right client. This element combines services, messaging and positioning in the market.


Omnipresence is made up of timing, frequency and platform. You are everywhere. There at the right time and using the right delivery vehicle.

Finally, there is intimacy, which is made up of conversation, connection and community. This element makes you a real person who is trustworthy and someone clients want to work with.

The agent can ignite their business success by strategically combining these elements to their business plan to help better serve their clients, as well as the working relationship between other agents.

James Caldwell, Engel Völkers San Francisco, 415-407-2525, james.caldwell@evrealestate.com.

A: In properly marketed listings, more than 95% of sales involve two agents, one representing the seller, the other the buyer. Active agents are constantly keeping track of the market through such features of the Multiple Listing Service as its “Hot Sheet” and “Coming Soon” features. A website and carefully curated photos with descriptions of the property and its neighborhood are critical to effectively introducing a new listing to the real estate community.

The icing on the cake are the words, in the MLS agent confidential remarks, “Vacant, Lockbox”. This means an agent can preview a new listing at their convenience and set up client tours easily, thus increasing the probability of a showing. Three more steps seal maximum exposure: a sign on the property; advertising the listing in the Saturday/Sunday open house section of the newspaper; and sending out an email blast to active agents.


Astrid Lacitis, Vanguard Properties, 415-860-0765, astrid@vanguardsf.com.

A: There are so many avenues now to introduce our new listings to the brokerage community. Of course we always put a listing on brokers tour. We put our new listing on our Marin Top Agent Network Group, send out E-Blasts with information and photos to all real estate firms and Realtors in Marin County, San Francisco, East Bay, and Silicon Valley. Networking is very important. We present our new listings to our Coldwell Banker and Marin County wide buy/sell meetings.

Contacting Realtors who had listing in the area where your new listing is; as many times they may have met a potential buyer.

Kathleen Daly, Coldwell Banker, 415-519-6074, kdaly@cbnorcal.com;

Lisa Lange, Coldwell Banker, 415-847-7770, lisalange@coldwellbanker.com.

Article source: https://www.sfgate.com/realestate/article/Besides-broker-tours-how-can-agents-introduce-14294356.php

Posted in SF Bay Area News | Tagged | Leave a comment

Historic San Francisco Mansion Trades Hands for $18 Million

San Francisco’s breezy Seacliff neighborhood, while not quite as opulent or excessively billionaire-laden as nearby Pacific Heights, is nonetheless a supremely pricey enclave home to multiple big-name tech tycoons — former Facebook president Sean Parker and Twitter’s Jack Dorsey among them. It also sports a stellar cache of lovely historic homes, many of them with sublime blufftop views across the bay.

Last week, a Tuscan-influenced 1920s neoclassical villa in Seacliff traded hands for exactly $18 million. As SFGate notes, that’s the second-biggest public closing price in San Francisco this year, though records reveal at least three other S.F. mansions recently traded hands in quiet off-market deals for even more money. And it’s also one of the priciest Seacliff deals ever closed, just behind Dorsey’s record-breaking $21.9 million splurge last year.

Built by noted architect Sylvain Schnaittacher and long owned by prominent S.F. businessman Doug Hickey — a former Obama and Clinton bundler who hosted fundraisers for the likes of Joe Biden at the house — the well-maintained $18 million manse was acquired by a low-profile local private equity guru and his writer wife, who said they selected the property primarily because of its views and Seacliff location, where it lies in close proximity to various nature trails and balmy beaches.

The stately manor shares a gated driveway with its equally stately next-door neighbor, one that passes between the two houses before dead-ending in a giant backyard motorcourt. There’s a two-car garage discreetly tucked around back, attached to and directly below the multi-story home’s generous outdoor terrace.

As with many structures of the era, the front door is actually located on the home’s side — about halfway down the driveway — and opens to a proper foyer with beige stone floors and tile inlays. The fully-renovated interiors additionally include a formal dining room, marble-slathered kitchen with high-grade appliances, and a living room with an eye-popping, picture-perfect view of the Golden Gate Bridge — on a rare fog-free day, of course.

There are five bedrooms within the home’s generous 6,305 square feet of living space, plus a “guest/au pair apartment.” The master includes a bedroom with trendy gunmetal gray walls, a sitting area, fireplace, marble bathroom, and big-picture windows overlooking the water. Other luxury home amenities include a family room with wet bar, a games room/lounge, temperature-controlled wine closet, and a sprawling rooftop deck outfitted with a jacuzzi and several outdoor chaise lounges.

The listing was held by Joan Gordon David Cohen of City Real Estate; the buyers repped by Janet Schindler of Sotheby’s International Realty.

Article source: https://variety.com/2019/dirt/more-dirt/historic-san-francisco-mansion-trades-hands-for-18-million-1203298463/

Posted in SF Bay Area News | Tagged | Leave a comment

KPIX Archive: 1969 News Events in the Bay Area

SAN FRANCISCO (KPIX) — Fifty years ago, the world held its breath as American astronauts became the first humans to walk on the moon. While the Apollo 11 mission made history, in 1969, there were other significant historic events that took place around the Bay Area.

KPIX took a look into its news vault and found some real gems. Some of our biggest stories involved campus unrest, teacher strikes, and minority student demands.

One story reported by Mike Lee at San Francisco State University shows riot police storming onto the campus, using their billy clubs on student protesters.

Another report filed by Ed Arnow shows National Guard vehicles lining the streets along the eastern side of the University of California, Berkeley. Gov. Ronald Reagan sent 2,200 guardsmen into Berkeley, and the scene captured by KPIX News photographers is unsettling: young guardsmen – some of them students – holding bayonets against the crowds.

“I am proclaiming a state of extreme emergency on the campus and around the surrounding area around the University of California at Berkeley,” proclaimed Reagan, as he announced his order to shut the campus unrest down.

“The City of Berkeley continues to resemble an armed camp no one know really knowing when or where the next confrontation will take place but as the speakers at the rally indicated they believe they can be in the streets longer than the National Guard can,” reported Arnow.

In 1969, there was a lot of social unrest. KPIX News reported on the revolutionary Black Panther Party, which was a powerful force around the area, particularly in Oakland.

Black Panther Party co-founder Bobby Seale defended the rights of Party members to arm themselves. “The gun is a proper, a very proper, liberation tool,” explained Seale to reporter Ed Arnow.

Also in ’69, an American President met with the leader of South Korea on Bay Area soil. KPIX 5 film captured the extraordinary day of events.

President Richard Nixon and his family flew on Air Force One from San Clemente to Hamilton Field in Novato. They then boarded the presidential helicopter which brought the party to Crissy Field in San Francisco where they were met by a friendly crowd before climbing into the official limousines for a quick trip to the Main Post. Crissy Field was a U.S. Army airfield in 1969.

10 minutes later by design, a second helicopter brought South Korean President Park Chung Hee and his wife to the same airfield. They then boarded their limos and traveled to meet Mr. Nixon. The two leaders discussed the threat posed by communist China, North Korea, and North Vietnam.

The footage contains some fascinating panoramic views of downtown San Francisco before the Transamerica pyramid was built and before the final touches on BART. The last section of the Transbay Tube was lowered into Bay waters on April 3, 1969; passenger service wouldn’t begin for another three years.

It’s fascinating to view all the topless and bottomless nightclubs that clogged up the streets of Broadway in San Francisco. Mayor Joe Alioto was livid and wanted to shut them all down. “If the Board of Supervisors sent me an ordinance banning topless, I would sign it,” said Alioto during a press conference in 1969.

Some things never change: A significant housing battle in the Bay Area was underway 50 years ago.

In San Francisco, a group of elderly Filipino men lived in an residential hotel called International Hotel. Called “I-Hotel” for short, the single room occupancy residential hotel was the heart of California’s Manilatown.

Real estate corporations and developers wanted to demolish I-Hotel, and replace it with a more profitable structure. The battle began in earnest in the late 60s. Tenants and housing advocates pushed back. The late former Mayor Ed Lee at the time was an attorney for the Asian Legal Caucus and volunteered his services. Eventually, the tenants were successfully evicted by San Francisco riot police. 197 tenants lost their homes.

During our search, we uncovered a musical treasure: early footage of the Fillmore West Dance Club run by the legendary Bill Graham and located on Geary Boulevard in San Francisco. The headliners that night were Creedence Clearwater. But one of the warmup bands was a very early version of Fleetwood Mac.

The year ended in historic tragedy: a free rock concert on the West Coast turned violent. The Rolling Stones were ending a national tour, and at the last minute, they became the headliners for a West Coast-styled “Woodstock.”

Famed concert promotor Michael Lang showed up in the offices of then famed local attorney Melvin Belli. Along with representatives of the Rolling Stones, they announced what turned out to be hastily drawn up plans to the assembled media. The organizers had finally gotten a location: the Altamont Speedway in Tracy.

“At 7 a.m., the gates will open,” proclaimed Belli.

KPIX Reporter Dave Monsees visited the sight and filed a report. “The Highway Patrol is worried about the last mile a small two lane road that’s the only access between the freeway and the speedway.”

An estimated 300,000 people showed up to a concert that increasingly turned violent. Four people died; three were accidental but one death was horrifying. A man who rushed the stage during the Rolling Stones performance brandished a gun. He was stabbed and stomped by a group of Hells Angels, and was pronounced dead on the scene.

Article source: https://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/2019/07/18/kpix-archive-1969-news-events-from-the-bay-area/

Posted in SF Bay Area News | Tagged | Leave a comment

Has the soul of San Francisco changed for good? These experts weigh in.


  • 6704a 920x920 Has the soul of San Francisco changed for good? These experts weigh in.

  •  Has the soul of San Francisco changed for good? These experts weigh in.

Caption

Close


Read through our slideshow above for a look at the many San Francisco neighborhoods that have been affected by gentrification or population displacement since the city was founded.

With San Francisco’s rents up 10 percent in just a year, more than doubling the cost of living, and housing tough to find, a real estate agent told The Chronicle, “When we get a new listing of an apartment dwelling, it’s almost always leased by the same day.”

That was in 1968 – the same year minorities were being driven from San Francisco neighborhoods in the name of “urban renewal.” The same year, a neighborhood was becoming infamous for its blight, crime and flagrant drug use (back then it was the Haight).

This isn’t to minimize the disturbing problems San Francisco faces now. But any recent coverage of how the city is losing its “soul” – The Chronicle’s Peter Hartlaub recently pointed out it’s been done many times before – can’t be done without remembering other changes in its past.


Several local historians and academics we talked to pointed out that if you don’t like San Francisco’s changes right now, just wait a while. It’s bound to change again, as it always has.

“From World War II forward I’ve lived through all this stuff, and I’ve seen a lot of silliness,” said historian John Freeman, 78 and a lifelong San Franciscan who bought a house in the Richmond in the 1960s when buying in the city was less desirable. “Now we’re in a whole new ballgame. We’re choked, and the infrastructure can’t keep up.

“I’m not predicting it’s going to implode, but it’s gonna change. That’s the name of the game. This whole town is a series of changes. I don’t get nostalgic for that kind of stuff. … I don’t want to get into this whole thing, that the ice cream used to be better and you walked down the street and saw your friends.”

Each San Francisco neighborhood contains layers of history involving people coming in and out. Take the Rincon Hill/South Park areas – originally a wooded oasis, then the city’s first exclusive community for the super rich, and then a “slum.” That’s before the 1900s even started.


“You can take the Gold Rush and the Silver Age and say this is comparable,” said San Francisco native Charles Fracchia, the founder and president emeritus of the San Francisco Historical Society. “There are different details. You take a look at old photos of a city growing, contracting, and growing again.”

Not that San Francisco’s problems of extreme inequality during the most recent tech boom are exactly the same as those in the past. The headlines today are alarming: The three most expensive counties to rent in are all in the Bay Area. San Francisco has the world’s highest density of billionaires. And all this while the city’s homelessness rose 30 percent since 2017.

Meanwhile, the loss of San Francisco’s African American community, which benefited from blue-collar jobs added in the post-World War II boom, has been devastating enough to inspire a movie this year. Once-diverse neighborhoods such as the Mission have gotten increasingly white and tech-employed.

Rachel Brahinsky, an associate professor in Urban and Public Affairs at the University of San Francisco, responded to the anti-tech backlash in 2014 with an article headlined, “The Death of the City? Reports of San Francisco’s demise have been greatly exaggerated.” But she says the most recent spate of bad news and critical reporting has been enough to make her reconsider, to a degree.

“It’s a question I’ve been asking myself because of all those articles,” Brahinsky said. “How much of this is the media hype of the moment and how much is measuring something that has dramatically accelerated? I think it’s somewhere in between.

“What’s been one of the most sobering shifts since I wrote that article is the dramatic rise in homelessness and the obvious fact that so many people living on the streets are becoming homeless before our eyes. That’s devastating to me. These articles have been focused on how the culture has been hollowing out, and I think you can certainly see that.

“But you also see this powerful resilience of a culture. I’m not ready to call it a death of the city just yet. There are so many examples of communities that are building still and not just disappearing.”

Brahinsky said it’s not a coincidence that the same crisis of displacement has also led to creation of things like the SOMA Pilipinas Cultural District in recent years. This included the preservation of Filipino businesses and the Gran Oriente Hotel as a place for affordable housing. At the same time, the Undiscovered SF Creative Night Market is entering its third year.

Another neighborhood to persevere even now is Chinatown, which as Freeman said, “was created to segregate the Chinese” and has survived several waves of gentrification. Even as neighboring “Manilatown” was erased after a violent night of evictions and protests in 1977.

P.E. Moskowitz, who researched San Francisco while writing “How to Kill a City: Gentrification, Inequality, and the Fight for the Neighborhood,” is less optimistic about San Francisco’s future.

“It’s a little late” for San Francisco, said Moskowitz, a native of New York’s West Village who was himself priced out. “I can’t imagine the activist movement coming out of a $3,000 apartment. To have activism, everything that makes cities great, you have to have affordability.”

We looked back to some of San Francisco’s earliest days to recount similar times that its neighborhoods have changed either due to gentrification or population displacement – the latter includes “urban renewal,” which was an official city policy that fundamentally disrupted the African American and Japanese communities in the 1960s and ’70s.

Swipe through the slideshow at the top of this article to find them. These are by no means all the examples – we exclude San Francisco’s earliest gold rush, which happened to be the Gold Rush.

Greg Keraghosian is an SFGATE homepage editor. Contact: greg.keraghosian@sfgate.com

Article source: https://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/gentrification-urban-renewal-bay-area-neighborhood-14271268.php

Posted in SF Bay Area News | Tagged | Leave a comment