Moms 4 Housing eviction: Just how many flips, vacant homes are there in Bay Area?

Thydour Coleman shook her head as she spoke about the four mothers evicted from a West Oakland house bought by a real estate investment company planning to flip it.

The McClymonds High School graduate was born and raised in the community, leaving for four decades before returning two years ago. It was unrecognizable, she said.

“The neighborhood has changed completely since I was a little kid,” Coleman said as she walked her dog a block away from the Moms 4 Housing eviction. “I’ve never seen so many homeless people in my life, and they keep building these expensive … houses. They only care about the rich and the famous.”

On Tuesday morning, Alameda County sheriff’s deputies evicted four mothers from a two-story home on Magnolia Street after they had occupied the house, without the owner’s permission, for nearly two months. The episode turned the spotlight on the Bay Area’s exorbitant housing prices — but also on the practice of home flipping and what role it plays in people being priced out of neighborhoods.

For the past nine years, Wedgewood Properties, the Southern California firm that owns the Magnolia Street house, has been one of Oakland’s most prolific house flippers, rehabbing and selling 160 homes. The company says it has spent an average of $57,000 per home, about $9.1 million in total, using all local labor to do the work. Most of the homes were owned by banks, having gone into foreclosure during and after the financial crisis of 2008. They include homes like 2753 67th Ave., which the company bought at auction for $367,000 and sold six months later for $573,000.

Wedgewood spokeswoman Leslie Moody said the company has paid more than $2 million to Oakland in transfer and property taxes. “We bring employment to the local community, rehabilitate severely damaged homes and revitalize communities,” she said. “That rundown, vacant house is now a like-new home available to first-time home buyers.”

Critics call it real estate speculation that fuels gentrification and displaces longtime working-class Oakland residents, many of them victims of predatory lending. More affluent newcomers take their place.

Housing data show that in the San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward metropolitan region, house flips are not as common as in many cities. In the third quarter of 2019, 380 homes were flipped, about 3.7% of all sales, according to Attom Data Solutions, a company that compiles real estate data. That rate ranked 129th out of 148 metro areas in the country.

 Moms 4 Housing eviction: Just how many flips, vacant homes are there in Bay Area?

The median purchase price of rehabilitated houses in the Oakland region was $604,000 and those properties’ median sales price was $735,000, a 21.7% return on investment, according to Attom. The company estimates that a flipper must spend 20% to 33% of the property’s after-repair value to rehab a house. The margin also ranks near the bottom of metro areas at 133rd.

Maksim Stavinsky, co-founder and chief operating officer of Roc Capitol, said in an Attom report that declining profits have led to an increased interest in renting out investment properties rather than renovating and selling them.

“We have been seeing a decline in projected and realized profits for borrowers on projects, despite the fact that borrower financing costs have been meaningfully coming down,” said Stavinsky. “This has led to much greater interest and activity in our rental programs. We expect these trends to continue.”

Flipping homes is not as easy as popular HGTV home improvement shows make it out to be, according to those who do it. Sean Pan, who has bought and fixed up five homes in Santa Clara County, said that he has not quite broken even financially on his investment. While he made $300,000 on one deal, he lost $400,000 on another. Like most house flippers he borrows money from private lenders, which means 10% interest rates. That gets expensive very quickly.

“With the last house, unfortunately, the market cooled down,” he said. “I took a fat loss. There are a lot of mistakes you can make. It was a hard lesson that you can lose money flipping houses just as quickly as you can make money.”

Single-family homes that are flipped tend to be older — the median year built is 1961 — and at an average of 1,300 square feet they are smaller than the homes being constructed, according to Attom. It takes an average of 181 days from purchase to sale of an investment property.

Almost 15% of the flipped homes last third quarter were bought with cash, while only 6.1% are sold to Federal Housing Administration buyers, often first-time home buyers.

The Moms 4 Homes group squatted inside 2928 Magnolia St., a two-story, three-bedroom, one-bath house built in 1908. Wedgewood bought the house for $500,000 at a foreclosure sale in July and took possession in November, two days after the mothers took residence.

The house sold in 1997 for $50,000, and in 1987 for only $15,000.

Todd David, executive director of the San Francisco Housing Action Coalition, said the occupation of the house was “totally predictable.”

“These moms got to the point where they said, pardon my French, ‘This is totally f—ing ridiculous. We can’t afford a place to live anywhere anymore,’ ” David said. “I don’t think anyone else should be surprised this happened because the frustration has reached a new level.

“This is the very predictable outcome because we’ve under-produced housing,” he said.

 Moms 4 Housing eviction: Just how many flips, vacant homes are there in Bay Area?

In California, there were 5,029 flips in the third quarter, about 5% of all sales, a 3% annual drop, according to Attom. The company used deed data to classify as a flip the sale of a single-family home or condo when the property had previously been sold within the last 12 months.

“That’s how gentrification occurs, because there’s not new units of housing on the market, so they take existing, older affordable housing and upgrade those units,” David said. “We created that flipping incentive by limiting the housing supply.”

Oakland City Council President Rebecca Kaplan has proposed that the city acquire homes destined for foreclosure auctions and use them for affordable housing. Alameda County’s homeless count last year showed a 47% increase in Oakland.

“Numerous people have been subjected to predatory foreclosures and wrongful evictions, leading to displacement and thousands of people living on our streets,” Kaplan said in a statement Thursday. “In order to provide affordable housing and protect and preserve housing for our community, it is important to use all tools available.”

In the San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward region, Attom found that of the 1.2 million residential properties, 4,539 were vacant in the fourth quarter of last year, or 0.38% of the housing stock. Almost 300,000 of those residential units were investment properties, and 3,027 of those, just over 1%, sat vacant, according to Attom. That percentage is ranked 151st out of 158 metro regions.

In the 94608 ZIP code, where the Magnolia Street property sits, there are 9,256 residential units and 18 were vacant in the fourth quarter last year. Almost 44%, or 4,065, of the neighborhood’s housing units were investment properties, and of those, 11 were vacant in the fourth quarter.

As for Coleman, the West Oakland native, she plans to move to Hayward or San Leandro, where it’s more affordable.

“I’ve had enough,” she said.

San Francisco Chronicle staff writer Rachel Swan contributed to this report.

Matthias Gafni and J.K. Dineen are San Francisco Chronicle staff writers. Email: matthias.gafni@sfchronicle.com, jdineen@sfchronicle.com Twitter: @mgafni, @sfjkdineen

Article source: https://www.sfchronicle.com/bayarea/article/Moms-4-Housing-eviction-Just-how-many-flips-14986950.php

Posted in SF Bay Area News | Tagged | Leave a comment

Bay Area median home price fell 2.3% last year, first annual drop since 2011

The median price paid for an existing, single-family home in the Bay Area fell in 2019 for the first full year since 2011, according to data from the California Association of Realtors.

The median price, the point at which half of homes sold for more and half for less, fell to $928,000, down 2.3% from $950,000 in 2018.

Forces pushing prices up — the region’s booming economy, chronic housing shortage and a hotly anticipated flood of initial public offerings — were offset by negative factors, including strained affordability, outmigration to cheaper locales and shrinking federal tax breaks for homeownership.

The association’s numbers do not include condominiums, new construction and homes that were not entered into a multiple listing service.

Of the nine Bay Area counties, Santa Clara had the biggest price drop, 5.6%. However, it had been the strongest the year before, rising 13.5%, said Patrick Carlisle, chief market analyst with Compass, a real estate brokerage.

Oakland-Berkeley was the strongest submarket last year, attracting buyers seeking an “urban ambience” at a lower cost than San Francisco, he said.

Abio Properties agent Shannon Prokup was stunned when a home she listed on Ashby Avenue in Berkeley attracted more than 400 people at open houses last Saturday and Sunday. The home has two bedrooms, one bathroom and 1,100 square feet; it is priced at $825,000. “I was not expecting that kind of turnout,” she said. But “there is not a ton on the market under a million dollars. And interest rates are still low.”

Prices in all of Alameda County, however, fell 2.1% last year. Prices were also down in Marin, San Mateo and Sonoma counties but up slightly in Contra Costa, Napa and Solano counties. San Francisco’s median price, $1.6 million, was dead even with 2018.

The median price in San Francisco hit a high in the second quarter of 2019, “probably driven by IPO hype,” Carlisle said.

98c2a 1280x0 Bay Area median home price fell 2.3% last year, first annual drop since 201198c2a 767x0 Bay Area median home price fell 2.3% last year, first annual drop since 2011

A string of large San Francisco companies went public, starting with Levi Strauss and Lyft in March, Pinterest in April, Uber in May and Slack in June. Most employees of these companies, except for Slack, which sold shares in a direct listing, were prohibited from selling their shares for up to six months.

In March and April, “A bunch of people said, ‘I’m not going to sell now, I’ll wait until the millionaires come out.’ Then there were buyers who said, ‘We need to buy now before we are competing with all these millionaires,’” Carlisle said. “The second quarter got exacerbated by the sellers waiting for the millionaires and buyers trying to beat millionaires to the market.”

And it wasn’t just in San Francisco. “The rush happened before everything went IPO,” said Linnette Edwards, co-founder of Abio Properties in the East Bay. “I had buyers who were adamant about buying before the IPOs,” including one couple that was expecting a baby. “They called it baby IPO,” she said.

Jason Buttorf, a Compass agent in San Francisco, had a client who works for Slack. He and his wife had been renting in Golden Gate Heights and eyeing homes there for years. In July, shortly after Slack went public, their “dream home” came on the market and they snapped it up for over $2.5 million.

By the time fall rolled around, however, the market “was mysteriously quiet and uneventful,” Buttorf said.

Carlisle agreed. “The hype might have affected (the market) more than the reality,” he said.

Prices typically peak in the spring and summer and decline in the fall and winter. On a year-over-year basis, Bay Area home prices did better in the second half than the first, largely because interest rates declined, said Jordan Levine, the Realtor association’s deputy chief economist.

But there’s no doubt that the market has cooled. The median price paid for a single-family existing home in the Bay Area fell from $727,000 in 2006 to $430,000 in 2009. It rose to $500,000 in 2010 (thanks in part to a first-time home buyer credit), then dropped again in 2011, to $460,000. After that it embarked on a string of stratospheric increases that brought it to $950,000 in 2018.

“As the economy picked up, home prices in the Bay Area, where the economy was outperforming the state and nation, bounced back very quickly,” Levine said. “As prices have risen, affordability has become more of a problem, which limits some price appreciation.”

Federal tax changes that took effect in 2018 have also “increased the cost of homeownership compared to what it was in the past,” he added. Congress reduced the mortgage interest deduction on loans originated after 2017 to interest on $750,000 in debt, down from $1 million. It also capped the previously unlimited deduction for all state and local taxes combined, including income and property taxes, at $10,000.

“You are seeing that play a role, particularly in the Bay Area, where most homeowners are going to be impacted by those caps,” Levine said. But, he added, you can’t blame it all on tax changes. “We have seen the pace of growth slowing for several years.”

For the month of December only, the median price paid for a single-family, existing home in the Bay Area was $908,750, down 1.8% from November but up 6.9% from December 2018, according to numbers released Friday by the Realtors association.

“December and January are almost always the lowest prices of the year,” Carlisle said. “The whole market is seasonal but the luxury market is fiercely seasonal.” High-end sellers leave for the holidays and take their homes off the market, assuming high-end buyers have also left. As a result, the market gets dominated by lower-end sales, which pulls down the median price.

The median price paid for a single-family home in San Francisco fell to $1.45 million in December, down 10.4% from November and down 3.3% from December 2018. That was the worst showing of any Bay Area county.

On a year-over-year basis, the December median price was up 3.7% in Alameda County, 8.6% in Contra Costa, 2.3% in Marin, 5.5% in Napa, 6.5% in Santa Clara, 7.2% in Solano and 1.3% in Sonoma. It fell 0.5% in San Mateo.

For the state as a whole, Levine predicts that low interest rates will continue to bolster buyer demand but shrinking inventories will keep sales from rising more than 1% or 2% this year. “We see price growth in the mid-single-digit range.”

Whether the Bay Area does better or worse than the state “is a tough call,” he said. The Bay Area “has upward momentum from the demand side,” as job growth keeps unemployment near record lows. But the inventory shortage is even more acute in the Bay Area, “which is spilling over to the demand side,” with people leaving the area in search of cheaper housing.

Kathleen Pender is a San Francisco Chronicle columnist. Email: kpender@sfchronicle.com Twitter: @kathpender

Article source: https://www.sfchronicle.com/business/networth/article/Bay-Area-median-home-price-fell-2-3-last-year-14985353.php

Posted in SF Bay Area News | Tagged | Leave a comment

Bay Area megaprojects: Where 13 major housing developments stand

The redevelopment of Treasure Island and neighboring Yerba Buena Island is approved for a new San Francisco neighborhood of up to 8,000 homes, 300 acres of parks, three hotels, restaurants, shops and entertainment venues. About 2,100 homes will be affordable. A new ferry terminal will offer 45 trips a day to San Francisco’s Ferry Building.

Heavy infastructure work is under way but much remains to be done. Dirt has been brought in to protect the island against storm surges and sea level rise. New water, sewer and power systems will be built.

Another challenge is that for decades, concerns have been raised about radioactive and chemical contamination left behind by military operations. The Navy, city and state agencies have said the island poses no safety issues for residents, and, according to the site’s developer, the cleanup has made “significant progress” under state oversight “to ensure the island is safe for development.” But since 2008, almost 1,300 radioactive objects have been found and removed from the island, some as recently as last fall, cleanup records show.

Article source: https://projects.sfchronicle.com/2020/bay-area-housing-megaprojects/

Posted in SF Bay Area News | Tagged | Leave a comment

‘Affordability ceiling’: Bay Area real estate market sluggish – Vallejo Times

The Bay Area home market remained sluggish in November, as buyers searched for cheaper homes and sales slowed entering the holiday season.

The median sale price for a single-family home in the Bay Area fell 2.4 percent to $803,200 in November from the previous year, according to Zillow.

Marin’s single-family home median in November was $1,171,000, compared with $1,133,900 in November 2018, Zillow reported.

After years of runaway prices, home shoppers are reaching the upper limits of their budgets, agents and economists say.

“More than anywhere else in the country, the Bay Area has hit an affordability ceiling,” said Zillow economist Jeff Tucker. “Once a price gets high enough, it’s out of reach.”

Prices in the nine-county region have slumped through most of 2019, after a record-breaking, seven-year streak of rising home prices. But even the cooling market remains the most expensive in the country, with the median Bay Area home price more than triple the $243,000 national median home value.

Higher interest rates late last year helped throw water on the raging Bay Area market, Tucker said. “It’s not a buyers’ market, it’s not a sellers’ market,” he said. “It’s certainly more balanced now.”

The regional economy continued to soar. The Bay Area added 3,900 jobs in November, according to state’s Employment Development Department.

Median single-family home prices increased in several other counties: San Mateo rose 3 percent to $1.37 million, Alameda inched up .4 percent to $863,400, Contra Costa increased 1.2 percent to $651,400, and San Francisco soared 5.8 percent to $1.4 million, according to Zillow data.

The Santa Clara County median single-family home price fell nearly 2 percent to $1.11 million, the 11th straight month of year-over-year declines in the once red-hot market popular with techies.

Bay Area properties continued to sell quickly in November, according to the California Association of Realtors (CAR). The typical time on market for homes in San Mateo, Alameda and Contra Costa counties decreased from the previous year.

Sale times in Santa Clara County and San Francisco remained stable — but still at a historically brisk pace. The typical home in the five core counties sold in less than three weeks, according to CAR.

The number of homes for sale also remains historically low. Inventory grew tighter in Alameda, Contra Costa, San Mateo and Santa Clara counties compared with last November, according to CAR.

Agents say the market has cooled as shoppers show more willingness to wait for the right features and best deal.

San Mateo agent Jeff LaMont of Coldwell Banker said he’s seeing fewer sales, but prices remain strong. Two-income tech couples looking for their first home are still driving demand in San Mateo County, he said.

Single family homes in good condition and priced fairly for their neighborhood still draw multiple offers from young buyers, he said. “The millennials don’t want to mess around,” LaMont said. “They want to move in.”

Fremont agent Nancie Allen, president of Bay East Association of Realtors, said older homeowners are often confronting hard choices. Some clients have explored leaving the Bay Area, she said, but have a hard time figuring out where to move.

Despite the expectations of a cash windfall from selling, many long-time homeowners are choosing to stay in their homes. “They really are torn,” Allen said. “They’re not sure where they would go.”

Overall, the East Bay market has seen solid demand for starter homes, even if prices reach near $1 million. But it’s not like the frenzy of recent years, Allen said.

“Buyers aren’t in a hurry,” she said. “Sellers aren’t in a hurry.”

Article source: https://www.timesheraldonline.com/have-bay-area-home-prices-hit-a-ceiling-2

Posted in SF Bay Area News | Tagged | Leave a comment

SF house sales slide, but condo selling surges

As 2019 winds toward an end, the slightly weird year-long trend of declining Bay Area home sales compared to last year continues—except when it comes to the condo market, where it seems that demand is soaring compared to 2018.

That at least is the tale told by the California Association of Realtors (CAR), which recently released its monthly raft of data compiling everything that happened with home sales in the state in November.

For those with an eye on sales of single-family homes the outlook was anemic, albeit by this time predictable.

In San Francisco, the price of a house is up significantly compared to last year—12.2 percent appreciation, to a median sale price of nearly $1.62 million—but the number of homes sold is, as it has been almost every month this year, way down, dropping 5.8 percent since 2018.

Most of the rest of the region did no better: Napa County dropped 18.5 percent, Alameda and Contra Costa Counties more than ten percent, and the Bay Area’s combined sales were down nearly five percent overall.

(The only increases compared to last year were in Marin and Sonoma, up 13.3 and 8.7 respectively.)

One month’s numbers aren’t necessarily that significant, but these stats have been on the slide all year, with the warning signs of a slump emerging early—back in April, the SF Assessor-Recorder’s Office noted that the number of properties sold in SF during the previous nine months declined more than 10 percent year over year.

There is, however, one big exception to the downward trend: The same CAR numbers show that if you isolate just condo sales, the numbers are up almost everywhere.

In SF the appreciation is small but significant—just 3.8 percent from 2018. But in Napa, it’s a margin of 60 percent, the highest in the region. Solano County leapt 25 percent, and Marin County 23.5.

Condo and townhome sales surged everywhere except for Sonoma County, with a significant decline of 36.7 percent.

SF condo prices dropped a little bit compared to 2018, ticking down less than one percent to $1.19 million. But in the overall Bay Area prices were up slightly (2.8 percent) to a median of $730K.

Note that in San Francisco, per the most recent Housing Inventory Report released earlier this year, single-family homes make up just 31 percent of the total housing in the city, and just 1.5 percent of new construction.

Article source: https://sf.curbed.com/2019/12/26/21038474/san-francisco-condo-sales-increase-car-november-2019

Posted in SF Bay Area News | Tagged | Leave a comment