5 Bay Area Real Estate Listings With Progressively More Extravagant Pools

The San Francisco real estate scene is so typically despair-inducing that an Oliver-style “May I have some more” isn’t the typical vibe. But it’s 2020, and it’s time to manifest some real estate magnificence: the Bay Area pool. (Hey, there’s a reason why those random castle-type things across Europe are called “follies.” Sometimes you just want the architecture you want.) 

Here, a round-up of Bay Area pools (houses come with), ranging from $500K+ to $85 million. Speaking of castles, there’s one here definitely fit for a lord, one for a Bond villain, one for someone who’d pay a whole lot less anywhere else, the one with the views, and the indoor heated one, because it’s nice to be practical. 

96956 pool 506 5 Bay Area Real Estate Listings With Progressively More Extravagant Pools
1177 California St. (Zillow)

Address: 1177 California St., #1211
Pricetag: $585K
In brief: OK, so it’s only a studio, but it has views of Twin Peaks, and it’s basically across the street from Grace Cathedral. The 437 square feet might not sound so limited (they’re calling it a “pied-à-terre”) if you spend most of your time inside staring out that window. 
Pool: Shared, indoor(!)

96956 pool longbridge 5 Bay Area Real Estate Listings With Progressively More Extravagant Pools
718 Long Bridge St (Zillow)

Address: 718 Long Bridge St. $114
Pricetag: $1.55M
In brief: What elsewhere might be a perfectly normal, 1,280-square-foot, two-bedroom apartment is here listed as a “luxury oasis” in Mission Bay. Lots of building amenities — rooftop space, an “outdoor edible garden,” two gyms — but you’ll have to share. 
Pool: Shared, outdoor

96956 pool sugarloaf 5 Bay Area Real Estate Listings With Progressively More Extravagant Pools
123 Sugarloaf Drive (Zillow)

Address: 123 Sugarloaf Drive, Belvedere Tiburon (Marin)
Pricetag: $7.9M
In brief: Spiral staircase? Panoramic views? A tidy little .4-acre lot? All that plus four beds, five baths, and nearly 5,900 square feet. 
Pool: But going back to those views for a second: If you’re a sucker for them, this property might offer the best of all — if you want to see the bay (and Golden Gate, and downtown San Francisco, and everything else) in all its weather-rich glory, this is your place. And the pool is perfectly situated to take it all in. 

96956 pool 16m 5 Bay Area Real Estate Listings With Progressively More Extravagant Pools
240 Pinehill Rd (Zillow)

Address: 240 Pinehill Rd, Hillsborough (San Mateo) 
Pricetag: $16.9M
In brief: You’ll get only three bedrooms from your nearly $17M payment. On the other hand: It really does sort of look like an Italian palace, and there’s a six-car garage. So for empty-nesters with a taste for things that go fast and “spectacular bay views.”
Pool: Quite possibly the best of the lot, we have a heated pool surrounded by the sort of highly ornamental topiary familiar to docudramas about 17th-century European royals. 

96956 pool 85m 5 Bay Area Real Estate Listings With Progressively More Extravagant Pools
This property in Marin County comes with its own pool house (Zillow)

Address: Undisclosed address, Ross (Marin)
Pricetag: $85M
In brief: How did Stephen Curry miss this one? For $85 mil, you’ll get 5 acres — 3.8 more than he got in Atherton — plus nine bedrooms, a tennis court, multiple terraces and balconies — oh don’t trust us, check out this castle-style map
Pool: Not just a pool but a huge, glass-walled pool house/guest house, ready for the Ryan Atwood in your life. 

Article source: https://www.insidehook.com/article/san-francisco/listings-february-2020-swimming-pools

Posted in SF Bay Area News | Tagged | Leave a comment

Free speech or dark money disclosure: Political operatives seek to gut SF campaign ad measure

A handful of prominent San Francisco political operatives are seeking to gut a ballot measure voters overwhelmingly passed last year that pulls back the curtain on who’s paying for campaign advertisements.

In a federal lawsuit filed last week, a group sued the city to neuter the key provisions of Proposition F, which its supporters named the “Sunlight on Dark Money Initiative.”

Prop. F, which passed with 77% of the vote and took effect in December, forces political campaigns to disclose their top three contributors of $5,000 or more in their advertising materials, along with exactly how much they gave. That threshold was previously $10,000.

If one of a campaign’s top three contributors is another political group — a common technique that can be used to obscure the sources of donations — the advertisements must also disclose that umbrella group’s top two contributors and the size of their donations. Among other provisions, the measure placed strict limits on contributions made by people or companies that have major real estate matters — worth $5 million or more — before the city.

The group that filed the lawsuit contends that so much mandated financial disclosure will crowd out the political messages campaigns are trying to convey through television, radio, print and online ads. The group argues that the constraints placed on political ads by Prop. F violate their free speech rights.

“The additional disclosure requirements strike me as being illegal,” said Todd David, the group’s principal officer and executive director of the Housing Action Coalition, an organization closely aligned with the mayor’s office. “I’m very concerned that this limits the ability of campaigns, particularly small campaigns to communicate.”

A twist in the lawsuit is that the group suing, led by David, was ostensibly formed to support and raise money for the upcoming earthquake safety bond on the March ballot. Another political committee, run by the San Francisco firefighters’ union, is the primary funnel for money aimed at supporting the earthquake measure and appears to be complying with Prop. F’s mandates.

The lawsuit has drawn support from two additional veteran campaign consultants with deep roots in San Francisco and Bay Area politics: Maggie Muir and Nicole Derse. Muir is a political strategist and campaign manager for Mayor London Breed, among other candidates and causes. Derse, the principal and cofounder of 50 + 1 Strategies, has run many local campaigns, most recently for former district attorney candidate Suzy Loftus.

Muir and Derse are not plaintiffs in the suit, but filed declarations with the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California supporting a motion to block the city from enforcing Prop. F.

“Proposition F makes it more difficult for voters to hear a campaign’s message, from any side,” Derse said in a statement. “Online ads are a cost-effective way for even the lowest budget campaigns to reach voters; as the law stands now, their entire 15-second ad could be a disclaimer. That’s just not fair to either campaigns or voters.”

Muir said in a statement: “The disclosure of campaign funders is critical to ensuring transparency for voters and the reason why San Francisco has robust disclaimer rules in place. The expanded disclaimers required under Prop. F renders useless many communication tools, particularly those used by smaller, less well-funded campaigns. In a 15-second digital ad, the spoken and written disclaimers will cover the entire ad. In smaller newspaper ads, the disclaimer will fill the space of the entire ad.”

Jon Golinger, who co-authored Prop. F, called the suit an attempt by business-friendly political consultants to obscure who’s behind the donations flowing to the candidates and causes they work for.

“This lawsuit is designed to keep voters in the dark so that secretive Super PACs can hide the real agenda behind their campaign ads,” he said in a statement.

In a brief, the group bringing the lawsuit argues that the disclosures mandated by Prop. F had forced the committee to make tough choices regarding from whom it seeks funding. The group, for instance, decided not to seek money from the San Francisco Association of Realtors because it’s “commonly associated with pro-development and pro-business interests,” which could turn off voters. But David’s group has taken money from San Francisco’s United Democratic Club, which itself has taken contributions from the Realtors Association. That means the association would still have to be identified as a donor for the earthquake measure.

“Wanting to hide unpopular donors is not a valid reason to deprive voters of information. We hope that the city attorney vigorously defends this law and the will of the voters in court,” Golinger said.

John Coté, a spokesman for the city attorney’s office, confirmed the city attorney is “defending this ballot measure consistent with First Amendment law.”

Dominic Fracassa is a San Francisco Chronicle staff writer. Email: dfracassa@sfchronicle.com Twitter: @dominicfracassa

Article source: https://www.sfchronicle.com/politics/article/Free-speech-or-dark-money-disclosure-Political-15033733.php

Posted in SF Bay Area News | Tagged | Leave a comment

Macy’s to lay off 831 SF workers, close local tech arm as it shuts 125 stores nationwide

Macy’s is laying off 831 employees in San Francisco at its Macys.com division amid plans to shift tech operations to Atlanta and New York, amid a broader retrenchment that is seeing it close 125 stores nationwide.

In a letter filed with the state of California on Monday, the retailer said the layoffs would take place between April and August of this year and impact everyone from software engineers to technical leads. The division has its own office at 680 Folsom St. in San Francisco and includes Macy’s product and digital revenue and technology teams.

“After careful consideration, Macy’s offices in San Francisco will close. We believe these changes will eliminate any duplication of efforts, bringing these teams closer to our business teams and strategy,” Emily Workman, a Macy’s spokeswoman, said in an email.

Eligible Macy’s workers in San Francisco will be given severance, including outplacement resources, and some will have the opportunity to transfer, Workman said. She added that Macy’s employs more than 5,000 people at 20 Macy’s stores in the Bay Area.

“I think it’s an unfortunate example of yet another major company leaving San Francisco,” said Jay Cheng, public policy director at the San Francisco Chamber of Commerce. “The business conditions in San Francisco have become untenable.”

It’s the city’s biggest round of layoffs in three years, said Ted Egan, San Francisco’s chief economist. Centerplate, the food caterer for the San Francisco Giants, laid off 1,330 employees in connection with its 2017 sale to French company Sodexo.

Although the local tech sector is booming, retailers have struggled as customers shift to online shopping. Mall anchors like Sears, JC Penney and Macy’s have shuttered stores amid bankruptcies and lower foot traffic.

“It more likely says more about the state of retail than the state of tech,” said Egan. Other non-tech companies such as McKesson and Bechtel have also left San Francisco as office rents and housing costs have soared to record highs, and Egan said Macy’s appeared to be making a similar cost-cutting decision.

“It’s a reminder that we’re a very expensive place to do business,” he said.

Macy’s is also planning to close a fifth of its locations over the next three years, the company said Tuesday. Overall, it’s cutting 2,000 corporate jobs or 10% of its staff and will make New York its sole headquarters and close its second headquarters in Cincinnati, according to the Wall Street Journal.

Macys.com has been based in San Francisco since 1998, when the retailer’s parent company established it as an independent division, at a time when many established companies saw the potential to spin off their internet subsidiaries amid a mania for dot-com stocks. Its closure marks another blow to established retailers’ hopes of competing with Amazon.com and startups. Few other retailers retain distinct e-commerce arms, preferring to integrate their websites and stores, though Walmart.com, the Arkansas retailer’s e-commerce arm, remains a distinct operation headquartered in San Bruno.

Macy’s has steadily downsized its physical presence in Union Square as it scales back on flagship stores. Last January, it sold the historic I. Magnin Building for $250 million. The new owner is proposing upper-floor condos and office space. In 2016, it sold its men’s store at 120 Stockton St. for $275 million to Morgan Stanley and Blatteis Schnur, which are also adding office space to that building. It also closed a store in San Francisco’s Stonestown mall in 2018.

Macy’s leases 243,000 square feet at 680 Folsom St., and its lease expires in 2028, according to real estate brokerage data. A spokesman for real estate brokerage JLL said it is marketing the space for sublease.

Macy’s on Wednesday is expected to unveil more details of a three-year strategy to adapt to the rise of e-commerce. The Cincinnati Business Courier reported that Macy’s is expected to unveil a new, smaller type of store called Market by Macy’s, with the first one opening in Southlake, Texas, Thursday.

Shwanika Narayan and Roland Li are San Francisco Chronicle staff writers. Email: shwanika.narayan@sfchronicle.com, roland.li@sfchronicle.com Twitter: @shwanika, @rolandlisf

Article source: https://www.sfchronicle.com/business/article/Macy-s-to-lay-off-831-workers-as-it-closes-SF-15029621.php

Posted in SF Bay Area News | Tagged | Leave a comment

How Bay Area cities got their names

During the recent NFC Championship that put the 49ers into the Super Bowl—and then subsequently broke Bay Area hearts—the broadcast seemed allergic to mentioning the Niners’ hometown of Santa Clara, which led to a fascinating explication of Santa Clara’s history and name.

But how exactly did the other Bay Area towns and cities end up with their enduring monikers? This entomological investigation turned out to be trickier than it sounds, as sometimes even the most storied locals cannot agree on the precise history of their communal sobriquet.

Here we have just a few of the most intriguing Bay Area decryptions. Note that these are listed in order of population, with the exception of San Francisco, which gets grandfathered into the top spot out of deference.


San Francisco

The city and county are both named after Mission San Francisco de Asís a la Laguna de los Dolores, which commemorates St. Francis of Assisi, the 13th century friar venerated as a patron of animals. However, the city (then barely a hamlet) was originally dubbed Yerba Buena, but on January 30, 1847, Chief Magistrate Washington Bartlett changed the name to correspond with that of San Francisco Bay to “prevent confusion and mistakes.”

San Jose

Unlike in San Francisco, Mission de San Jose was built after the town was established. This South Bay city cites Saint Joseph—the patron of workers, travelers, and immigrants who was the Biblical husband of the Virgin Mary—as its namesake. However, there are dozens of other saints named some variation of Joseph, which has caused some confusion over the name in the past.

Oakland

Per the 1892 history book The Bay of San Francisco, part of the area presently called Oakland was previously known as “Encinal del Temescal”—roughly “the oak grove near the sweat lodge.” Neither of those landmarks exists today, but the references survive in the name of the city and its hip neighborhood. Present-day Oakland covers the area of a number of other long-vanished historical settlements, including the onetime towns of Brooklyn, Clinton, and San Antonio, whose names still grace parts of the modern U.S. map.

Fremont

As students of California history know, John C. Fremont was a soldier and explorer pivotal to seizing California from Mexico during the Mexican-American War. He later went into politics, briefly serving as a U.S. senator and running for president on an abolitionist ticket. Less savory parts of his biography, like his probable war crimes, tend to get glossed over.

Santa Rosa

Unlike other cities with a saintly disposition, no Mission exists in Santa Rosa. Nevertheless, New World Encyclopedia credits Saint Rose of Lima, a 16th/17th century nun and patron of Latin America, as the namesake for the North Bay city.

Hayward

William Hayward was an original 49er, traveling to San Francisco aboard a steamer from Massachusetts to seek his fortune. As the Hayward city history page says, Hayward, like most of his contemporaries, failed to find much gold in the hills, but he did find a nice spot for a hotel and general store that formed the backbone of the eventual town that bears his name.

Sunnyvale

According to the popular Images of America history book series entry about Sunnyvale, the Silicon Valley town’s name was an act of pure marketing, perpetrated by the ultimate marketer: early 20th century real estate speculator Walter E. Crossman. Originally called either Murphy or Encinal (it varied, apparently), Crossman pushed the Sunnvale name on the town to “attract winter-weary easterners to a new world of sunshine, fruit, and flowers.”

Concord

Originally called Todos Santos (“all saints”), denizens pushed the Concord name on the town in 1869. Town founder Fernando Pacheco put a missive in the Contra Costa Gazette calling the new name “falsely acquired” and insisting “the town of Concord does not exist.” Alas, his words didn’t take. Possibly migrants from the East Coast found the Concord name more appealing than a Spanish-language one. Or possibly the townsfolk adapted a name from any of the various other U.S. cities called Concord, which, in turn, take their title from the English word “concord.”

Santa Clara

Both Mission Santa Clara and the nearby city bear the name of Saint Clare of Assisi, a 13th century nun who serves as the patron saint of eye disease and centuries later retroactively also became the patron of television.

Vallejo

General Mariano G. Vallejo, a wealthy 19th century Californio born in Monterey, led a wild and varied life across Northern California and often seems quite luckless in hindsight, at various points being excommunicated by the Catholic Church and imprisoned by John Fremont during the war. In the years after the U.S. absorbed California, Vallejo lost much of his land and wealth but at least he still has one lasting namesake, the city he initially established as California’s capital.

Berkeley

As UC Berkeley’s own Daily Californian reports, the university and subsequently the city bear the name of George Berkeley (1685–1753), “an Anglo-Irish philosopher and empiricist whose major contribution in his field was that of subjective idealism.” A wild man, that one. Berkeley died more than a century before the founding of the East Bay city; college trustees picked the name because, per the Berkeley Historical Plaque Project, the beauty of the location recalled a particular George Berkeley poem: On the Prospects of Planting Arts and Learning In America.

Fairfield

As city records note, clipper ship captain Robert Waterman named the city after his hometown of Fairfield, Connecticut, which itself is named after nothing more remarkable than the beautiful (“fair”) landscape. Sometimes it’s that simple.

Richmond

The 2002 history book Historic California holds that local toff Edmund Randolph named Point Richmond long before any city was established nearby, commemorating his hometown of Richmond, Virginia, which is named for the English town of Richmond (now part of London), which was itself named for an 11th century castle: “Riche Mount,” or “the strong hill.” Phew.

Antioch

Founded as Smith’s Landing, after founding siblings. The 1998 history book California Place Names reports that the town minister persuaded residents to change the city’s name to reflect the Biblical city of Antioch, believing that nothing less befitted the solemnity of the occasion.

Daly City

After the 1906 earthquake, wealthy dairy farmer and landowner John Daly allowed scores of displaced refugees to resettle on his vast tracts of property just to the south. By 1911 it was a new town, named in honor of the original landlord.

Vacaville

While the name literally means “cow town,” this is a merely coincidence. ABC 10 reports that “Vaca” was the surname of the original landowner, who sold off the property for the purposes of development on the condition that they name the city after him. And so it was.

Napa

Alexandria Brown of the Napa County Historical Society writes that the origins of the name (spelled “Nappa” in those days) remain elusive, with the most likely explanation being that it derives from some indigenous word, supposedly meaning anything from “village” to “fish” to “grizzly bear.” She also notes that nobody ever formally excised the second “P,” it just up and disappeared sometime around 1848.

Alameda

Alameda residents picked their city’s name the old-fashioned way: with an off-year election in 1853, favoring a name that translates roughly to “grove of poplar trees.”

Palo Alto

“The place of the tall trees,” likely named after one particular redwood tree, “El Palo Alto,” which probably still qualifies as Silicon Valley’s single most celebrated resident—certainly the one with the most consistently good PR.

Article source: https://sf.curbed.com/2020/2/4/21121926/bay-area-city-names-history-san-francisco

Posted in SF Bay Area News | Tagged | Leave a comment

Real Estate Steal? San Francisco Parking Spot Available For $100,000

SAN FRANCISCO (CBS SF) — As outrageous as the Bay Area real estate market has become in recent years, a new bit of property now up for sale in San Francisco might take the cake.

A parking spot at a condo near Oracle Park in the South Beach neighborhood is available for a whopping $100,000.

Parking spot number 140 is located at the condominium complex at 88 Townsend. Real estate agent Bill Williams is pitching the spot as a perfect investment.

“PARK YOUR MONEY! Great parking spot for investor clients, 1 block from the ball park!” the text from the property listing reads. “Current tenant is leasing for $300 month-to-month. To be clear: This is for a PARKING SPACE ONLY.”

Other properties listed at the address are on the market for close to $900,000, so perhaps $100,000 still qualifies as a bargain.

Article source: https://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/2020/02/03/real-estate-steal-san-francisco-parking-spot-100000/

Posted in SF Bay Area News | Tagged | Leave a comment