<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>homesmillbrae.com &#187; Swimming Pools</title>
	<atom:link href="http://homesmillbrae.com/tag/swimming-pools/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://homesmillbrae.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2022 03:48:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Why Home Refinancing Boom Is Different This Time</title>
		<link>https://homesmillbrae.com/1756/why-home-refinancing-boom-is-different-this-time/</link>
		<comments>https://homesmillbrae.com/1756/why-home-refinancing-boom-is-different-this-time/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2012 00:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Real Estate News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[17 Years]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Price Inflation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Different This Time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie Mae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie Mae And Freddie Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freddie Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Half A Million]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Home Refinancing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homes millbrae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Low Interest Rates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Negative Equity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Principal Balance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Record Lows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Refinancing Mortgages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retail Spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Swimming Pools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trillion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U S Home]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://homesmillbrae.com/1756/why-home-refinancing-boom-is-different-this-time/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[U.S. home owners are refinancing their mortgages at the fastest clip since 2005, but the difference now is they are putting cash in, not taking it out. At the going rate, 25 percent of all first-lien U.S. mortgages will be &#8230; <a href="https://homesmillbrae.com/1756/why-home-refinancing-boom-is-different-this-time/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a name="StoryImage" />
<p class="textBodyBlack"><span />U.S. home owners are refinancing their mortgages at the fastest clip since 2005, but the difference now is they are putting cash in, not taking it out. </p>
<p><img src="http://homesmillbrae.com/wp-content/plugins/rss-poster/cache/63bab_mortgage_calculator.jpg" border="0" align="Left" height="150" width="200" vspace="0" hspace="0" title="Why Home Refinancing Boom Is Different This Time" alt="63bab mortgage calculator Why Home Refinancing Boom Is Different This Time" />
<p class="textBodyBlack"><span />At the going rate, 25 percent of all first-lien U.S. mortgages will be refinanced this year, according to LPS Applied Analytics. That represents about $7.1 billion —just through June of this year — in savings on monthly payments, according to economists at Freddie Mac, who ran the numbers for this report.</p>
<p class="textBodyBlack"><span />Seven years ago, refinancing wasn’t about saving on monthly payments; it was about pulling cash out. Homeowners extracted close to a trillion dollars collectively in home equity in 2005 and largely put it toward home remodeling, swimming pools, cars, vacations and retail spending.</p>
<p class="textBodyBlack"><span /></p>
<p class="textBodyBlack"><span />Today, 81 percent of homeowners refinancing their first-lien mortgages either kept the same loan amount or lowered their principal balance by paying-in additional money at closing, according to Freddie Mac.</p>
<p class="textBodyBlack"><span /></p>
<p class="textBodyBlack"><span />“The net dollars of home equity converted to cash as part of a refinance, adjusted for consumer-price inflation, was at the lowest level in 17 years,” the Freddie report notes. Rather than build debt, they reduced it. </p>
<p class="textBodyBlack"><span />Refinances are surging this year, not just because interest rates are hitting new record lows but because the government is making severely underwater loans eligible for refinance. (<em>Read More:</em> <b><strong><a href="/id/49343717/"><strong>Is Housing Recovering as Much as Everyone Thinks?</strong></a></strong></b>)</p>
<p class="textBodyBlack"><span />The Home Affordable Refinance Program, which involves loans backed by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, used to cap negative equity, but this year that cap was removed, putting thousands more loans into the refi machine. So far more than half a million loans were refinanced through HARP since the beginning of this year. </p>
<p class="textBodyBlack"><span /></p>
<p class="textBodyBlack"><span />Politicians and housing advocates claim that all the savings from these record low interest rates and the ensuing refinances is going back into the economy, but that does not appear to be the case. (<em>Read More</em>: <b><strong><strong>Fed Pulls Trigger, to Buy Mortgages in Effort to Lower Rates</strong></strong></b>)</p>
<p class="textBodyBlack"><span />Given the research from Freddie Mac, a quick, non-scientific survey of small lenders and brokers, produced similar findings: </p>
<p class="textBodyBlack"><span /><b><strong>Craig Strent/Apex Home Loans, Maryland</strong></b>: Homeowners, particularly older ones that have already met their financial planning goals, are taking the savings and just putting it back in the loan, meaning they are lowering their rates, but continuing to pay the same amount on the new loan that they were paying on the previous loan. This accelerates their payoff and decreases the interest they pay, though arguably with an opportunity cost given how cheap the money is. </p>
<p class="textBodyBlack"><span /><b><strong>Dan Green/Waterstone Mortgage, Ohio</strong></b>: Not all households are choosing to reduce payments. Many are choosing to reduce term. At today&#8217;s rates, the first payment of a 15-year mortgage is comprised of 67 percent principal. To get that point on a 30-year mortgage would take 18 years. More homeowners are asking about amortization schedules, and the benefits of paying extra principal each month. There&#8217;s more talk of saving than spending. </p>
<p class="textBodyBlack"><span /><b><strong>Julian Hebron/RPM Mortgage, California</strong></b>: Refi to lower payment, but keep making previous payment to pay loan down faster. Example: If you use our average loan of $550,000 and super-conforming rates of 3.5 percent now vs. 4.5 percent a year ago, a borrower’s payment drops from $2,787 to $2,429 (this factors in the paydown of $550,000 to $541,000 over 12 months). If a borrower keeps making old payment on new loan, thereby paying loan down by an extra $358 per month, they cut 6 years (or 20 percent) off a 30-year term. </p>
<p class="textBodyBlack"><span />(<em>Read More</em>: <b><strong><strong>Is Housing Risen From Ashes?</strong></strong></b>)</p>
<p class="textBodyBlack"><span />Suffice it to say, when it comes to home equity, we have fast become the anti-ATM society, by will or by force (we don’t have a whole lot of home equity anymore). </p>
<p class="textBodyBlack"><span />After trillions of dollars in lost home equity, Americans now appear to want it back so badly that they’re willing to pay it in themselves. They also want less debt for a shorter period of time. </p>
<p class="textBodyBlack"><span />This sounds like responsible, conservative fiscal planning, but it also means that savings from rock-bottom interest rates do not get paid back into the economy the way so many politicians and analysts have suggested. </p>
<p class="textBodyBlack"><span /><em>-By CNBC&#8217;s Diana Olick <br /></em><a href="https://twitter.com/diana_olick" target="_blank"><strong>@Diana_Olick </strong></a></p>
<p><em>Questions? Comments?<b><strong> </strong></b></em><em><strong /></em><em> </em></p>
<p class="textBodyBlack"><span /></p>
<p><img width="100%" height="0" title="Why Home Refinancing Boom Is Different This Time" alt=" Why Home Refinancing Boom Is Different This Time" /></p>
<p>Article source: <a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/49360773?__source=RSS*blog*&amp;par=RSS">http://www.cnbc.com/id/49360773?__source=RSS*blog*&amp;par=RSS</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://homesmillbrae.com/1756/why-home-refinancing-boom-is-different-this-time/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Remodeling as a Housing Indicator</title>
		<link>https://homesmillbrae.com/597/remodeling-as-a-housing-indicator/</link>
		<comments>https://homesmillbrae.com/597/remodeling-as-a-housing-indicator/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 06:34:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Real Estate News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Borrowers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Caves]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Confidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Double Dip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Numbers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Shares]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Home Purchases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homes millbrae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Housing Bubble]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Housing Market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kitchens And Bathrooms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Association Of Home Builders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Negative Equity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Kitchens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pending Home Sales Index]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Touches]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Royal Wedding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Swimming Pools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tail Wind]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zero Confidence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://homesmillbrae.com/597/remodeling-as-a-housing-indicator/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Page 1 of 3 &#124; Next PageShow Entire Article We&#8217;re always looking at indicators to see where the housing market is headed, like today&#8217;s reading of the Realtors&#8217; &#8220;Pending Home Sales Index,&#8221; which measures contracts signed for home purchases, hence &#8230; <a href="https://homesmillbrae.com/597/remodeling-as-a-housing-indicator/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>            Page 1 of 3 | Next Page<br />Show Entire Article
<p />
<p>We&#8217;re always looking at indicators to see where the housing market is headed, like today&#8217;s reading of the Realtors&#8217; <strong><strong>&#8220;Pending Home Sales Index,&#8221;</strong> </strong>which measures contracts signed for home purchases, hence an indicator of future closings. We look at consumer confidence, construction permits, even employment numbers to gauge housing&#8217;s future, but what about remodeling as an indicator? </p>
<p>Today the National Association of Home Builders put out its quarterly remodeling index, which rose to the highest level since 2006. </p>
<p>What does remodeling say about home buying? I think it says two things. </p>
<p>At the top of a housing bubble, there&#8217;s a lot of remodeling because a lot of people are buying a lot of homes, and they naturally want to put their personal touches on those homes. We also saw a lot of remodeling during the housing boom because so many borrowers took all that bloated equity out of their homes to pay for new kitchens and bathrooms and swimming pools and &#8220;man caves&#8221; (<em>I really really hate that term</em>). </p>
<p>Remodeling plummeted during the housing crash because of negative equity, lack of home buying, and zero confidence in housing as an investment. Not to mention that nobody wanted to spend a dime of whatever cash they had on anything. </p>
<p>So now as we bump along the bottom and anticipate a potential double dip, why would remodeling improve? </p>
<p>Page 1 of 3 | Next Page<br />Show Entire Article  </p>
<p>             <span class="story_blue"><br />
		<a href="/us_news/42810413/1"><br />
             Cheap Dollar Fuels One-Way Bets in Everything Else             </a></span></p>
<p>             <span class="story_blue"><br />
		<a href="/us_news/42799598/1"><br />
             European Shares to Open Mixed; Volume Thin             </a></span></p>
<p>             <span class="story_blue"><br />
		<a href="/us_news/42812081/1"><br />
             Wait Nearly Over as British Royal Wedding Dawns             </a></span></p>
<p>             <span class="story_blue"><br />
		<a href="/us_news/42806831/1"><br />
             Friday Look Ahead: Stocks Could Ride Out April on Earnings Tail Wind             </a></span></p>
<p>             <span class="story_blue"><br />
		<a href="/us_news/42795146/1"><br />
             US Says Gaddafi Troops Raping, Issued Viagra             </a></span></p>
<p>   <span class="story_blue"><b><a href="/us_news"><br />
      More Top Stories</a></b></span></p>
<p>Article source: <a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/42800288?__source=RSS*blog*&amp;par=RSS">http://www.cnbc.com/id/42800288?__source=RSS*blog*&amp;par=RSS</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://homesmillbrae.com/597/remodeling-as-a-housing-indicator/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Estimated $100 Million Home Sale Places Spotlight on Real Estate in Los Altos &#8230;</title>
		<link>https://homesmillbrae.com/555/estimated-100-million-home-sale-places-spotlight-on-real-estate-in-los-altos/</link>
		<comments>https://homesmillbrae.com/555/estimated-100-million-home-sale-places-spotlight-on-real-estate-in-los-altos/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Apr 2011 23:22:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SF Bay Area News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bigwig]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Sky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fred Chan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[French Chateau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Home Compounds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homes millbrae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Los Altos Hills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Los Altos Hills Homes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Luxury Properties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Median Home Price]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Headlines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Population Town]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Portola Valley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Silicon Valley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Square Foot Range]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Swimming Pools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wealthiest Towns In America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White Elephants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wife Annie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wine Cellar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://homesmillbrae.com/555/estimated-100-million-home-sale-places-spotlight-on-real-estate-in-los-altos/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last week’s report of the record-setting real estate deal between a Silicon Valley bigwig and a Russian billionaire for an estimated $100 million in Los Altos Hills has put the 9,000 population town in the national headlines. It also surprised many &#8230; <a href="https://homesmillbrae.com/555/estimated-100-million-home-sale-places-spotlight-on-real-estate-in-los-altos/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last week’s report of the record-setting real estate deal between a Silicon Valley bigwig and a Russian billionaire for an estimated $100 million in Los Altos Hills has put the 9,000 population town in the national headlines.</p>
<p>It also surprised many who live in the area. Los Altos Hills has been proud of its rural, easy-going roots, which has been in transition with the influx of more monied residents. As much as we know the value of our neighborhoods, a $100 million-dollar home exceeds the imagination of most, since it&#8217;s pegged as the most expensive single family home sale in America.</p>
<p>What does that look like? The architect who originally designed the home for Fred Chan and his wife, Annie, told the Wall Street Journal that there was &#8220;no budget&#8221; for the 18th century French chateau-inspired mansion, that includes tennis courts, indoor and outdoor swimming pools, wine cellar and ballroom, taking up a tidy 25,000 square feet.</p>
<p>Los Altos Hills is one of the wealthiest towns in America. Yet &#8220;home compounds&#8221; in the 20,000-square-foot range are rare enough that the handful that have been built have raised eyebrows, and caused civic concern that the town could end up with &#8220;white elephants&#8221; in the future.</p>
<p>In reality, homes in Los Altos Hills are much more modest than the $100 million that the Journal reported was paid by Russian investor Yuri Milner, founder of Digital Sky Technologies. Of course, to 99.9% of Americans, there is nothing modest about owning a $2.2 million home, which was the median home price of Los Altos Hills in February. Much of the action in very high-end luxury properties, however, is generally acknowledged to take place in communities such as Portola Valley or Atherton. </p>
<p>Between $2.2 and $100 million, where do the values of most Los Altos Hills homes fall? To satisfy my own—and maybe your—curiosity, I pulled from the MLS the ten-most expensive homes that were sold in Los Altos Hills since 2000.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s one important caveat. They aren&#8217;t likely to <em>actually</em> be the most expensive homes sold. That&#8217;s the thing to remember about homes selling in the highest strata: The sales price is usually nowhere to be found on the MLS, the multiple listings service in which most real estate brokers participate.</p>
<p>These types of home sales are made &#8220;off market,&#8221; when an agent representing a seller makes it known to his or her network that a property is for sale, and buyers who want discretion also rely on a representative to find an appropriate property through networks. But here&#8217;s some perspective: In Los Altos Hills and Los Altos, high off-market sales prices talked about have been in the $25-or-30-million range. </p>
<p>Through bypassing the MLS, the agreed-upon sales price never appears on a publicly visible database. Once the sale is made, don&#8217;t expect to find the sales price reflected on the deed at the county recorder&#8217;s office, either.</p>
<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s called California Revenue and Taxation Code 11932,&#8221; said Vic Sharma, the head of the Santa Clara County Recording division. Colloquially, in the Recorder&#8217;s office, it&#8217;s known as &#8220;a confidential,&#8221; a request to keep the transfer tax amount off the deed, and thus obviate the ability to calculate the sales price from the tax.</p>
<p>Anyone can request a confidential, Sharma said, and has been able to since 1959. You needn&#8217;t be a billionaire foreign investor or Donald Trump. If you don&#8217;t want people to know how much you paid for your one-bedroom condo next to the landfill, you have as much access to a confidential  as Yuri Milner does.</p>
<p>The tax, of course, is recorded by the county—which needs to get paid—but once it&#8217;s logged in, an employee in the Recorder&#8217;s office can&#8217;t see it nor retrieve it. &#8220;I&#8217;m not interested, no—it&#8217;s not my money,&#8221;  Sharma said.</p>
<p>&#8220;There&#8217;s a lot of speculation on the price, and that&#8217;s all I can say.&#8221; </p>
<p>So here are the top ten highest sales prices paid for Los Altos Hills properties, with the usual MLS admonition that the information is deemed reliable but not guaranteed. Remember that the highest visible price of a home sold in Los Altos Hills can easily be lower than that of a non-public, off-market sale in Los Altos:</p>
<p> <strong>1. 13902 Campo Vista Ln – Sold for $14.8 million (2007)</strong></p>
<p>Topping the list is a 6.89 acre property with views of the Bay and the mountains around. The house sitting on the lot has only two bedrooms with 2000 sf. Obviously, the value was in the land.</p>
<p><strong>2. 25751 Elena Rd. – Sold for $12 million (2006)</strong></p>
<p>This newly constructed Mediterranean estate, sitting on a two-acre lot, has six bedrooms and eight and a half baths with 12,000 square feet of living space. Other amenities include a game room, an exercise room, a wine cellar, a pool, and a detached cabana with its own kitchen.</p>
<p><strong> 3. 25810 Vinedo Ln – Sold for $12 million (2005)</strong></p>
<p>This four-acre private gated estate has five bedroom and eight baths with a stunning formal entry, a designer’s kitchen, two offices, a home theatre, and an exercise room. Besides over 12000  sf of living space, it has its own vineyard inside the estate. (This home is currently for sale at $14,995,000.)</p>
<p><strong> 4. 12775 Viscaino Rd – Sold for $12.7 million (2004)</strong></p>
<p>This 7,000+ square-foot home sits on a 2.36 acre lot with six bedrooms and seven baths. Additional features include a guest house, a tennis court, a pool and a pool house.</p>
<p> <strong>5. 12638 La Cresta Ct – Sold for $12 million (2000)</strong></p>
<p>This private gated estate is located on a cul-da-sac lot. The home has five bedrooms and four and a half baths with over 4,800 square feet of living space.</p>
<p> <strong>6. 10285 Magdalena Rd – Sold for $11 million (2008)</strong></p>
<p>A gated Mediterranean estate with views of the Bay and city lights, this property has seven bedrooms and nine and a half baths. Other dramatic features include a wine cellar, an infinity pool and a cabana.</p>
<p><strong> 7. 26000 Alicante Ln – Sold for $10 million (2000)</strong></p>
<p>This 4,000+ square-foot property sits on an acre plus level lot close to town. It has four bedrooms and three baths, and a tennis court and a pool.</p>
<p><strong>8. 13815 Barton Ct – Sold for $9.95 million (2009)</strong></p>
<p>This gated Tuscan retreat, sitting on an acre-plus lot not too far from the village, was built in 2007. The three-level home has a basement with elevator and handicap access. With over 7,000 square feet of living space, it has five bedrooms and six baths.</p>
<p><strong> 9. 27241 Altamont Rd – Sold for $9.5 million (2000)</strong></p>
<p>This six acre plus estate, with magnificent bay views, has over 6000 sf of living space with six bedrooms and four baths.</p>
<p> <strong>10. 13350 Country Wy – Sold for $9.1 million (2000)</strong></p>
<p>This 2.4 acre estate boosts magnificent views of the wooded hill. The home has five bedrooms with three and a half baths with close to 6,000 square feet of living space.</p>
<p> </p>
<p><em>Los Altos Patch editor L.A. Chung contributed to this report</em></p>
<p>Article source: <a href="http://losaltos.patch.com/articles/estimated-100-million-home-sale-places-spotlight-on-real-estate-in-los-altos-hills">http://losaltos.patch.com/articles/estimated-100-million-home-sale-places-spotlight-on-real-estate-in-los-altos-hills</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://homesmillbrae.com/555/estimated-100-million-home-sale-places-spotlight-on-real-estate-in-los-altos/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
