Silicon Valley doesn’t make cut for Amazon’s second headquarters

In fact, the Seattle company largely stayed away from the tech heavy West Coast. The shortlist includes: Columbus, Newark, Pittsburgh, Nashville and Northern Virginia, New York City, Boston and Washington, D.C. Also making the cut was Toronto, the only non-U.S. city on the list.


Amazon started a nationwide scramble last year when it said it was in the market for a new city to place its second headquarters. The new headquarters could be as large as 8 million square feet, cost as much as $5 billion to build, and lead to up to high-paying 50,000 jobs, Amazon said.

Enticed by the offer, and the accompanying potential for economic development, 238 cities in North America threw in a bid. The company said it would give preference to “stable and business-friendly” cities that can attract and retain technical talent. To qualify, the city had to be within a 45 minutes drive to an international airport and have mass transit system.

Among the hopefuls was a coalition of Bay Area cities — Concord, Fremont, Oakland, Richmond and San Francisco — who submitted a joint bid in October. This group tried wooing Amazon with potential sites such as the former Concord Naval Weapons Station, Coliseum City in Oakland, and San Francisco’s Hunters Point Shipyard. San Jose submitted a separate bid.

“Getting from 238 to 20 was very tough – all the proposals showed tremendous enthusiasm and creativity,” Amazon said in a tweet. It is unclear when the finalist will be announced.

For many in the Bay Area, Amazon’s choice to exclude the region brings relief. While there is a high concentration of talent, the tech boom is also associated with major problems: high housing prices, traffic congestion and a growing gap between the haves and haves-notes. Companies have trouble recruiting enough software engineers — a situation Amazon will be well aware of.

“Every city is like ‘Me! Me! Me!’ But they should be careful what they ask for,” James Thomson, a former Amazon executive turned e-commerce consultant, previously told The Chronicle. “If Amazon shows up with that many people … what is that going to do to the cost of real estate?”

Trisha Thadani is a San Francisco Chronicle staff writer. Email: tthadani@sfchronicle.com Twitter: @TrishaThadani

Article source: http://www.sfchronicle.com/business/article/Silicon-Valley-doesn-t-make-cut-for-Amazon-s-12507387.php

Posted in SF Bay Area News | Tagged | Leave a comment

California tops national list of priciest ZIP codes for home sales. By a lot

Move over, New York – a California community now has the priciest ZIP code in the U.S. (And it’s not 90210).

A year-end report by real estate database PropertyShark finds that California had 77 of the nation’s top 100 most expensive ZIP codes for home sales in 2017 – including five of the list’s top 10. New York ranked second with 19 of the top 100. No other state had more than two ZIP codes on the list.

The top U.S. ZIP code by home sale prices was 94027 in Atherton, part of California’s Silicon Valley, which posted a median sale price of $4.95 million, displacing 2016’s leader – 11962 in Sagoponack, N.Y., which fell to 15th on the list.

Other California ZIP codes in the top 10 include 90210 in Beverly Hills, 90402 in Santa Monica, 94301 in Palo Alto, and 94022 in Los Altos.

Never miss a local story.

Sign up today for a free 30 day free trial of unlimited digital access.

ZIP codes in New York and Florida rounded out the top 10.

Communities in Los Angeles and the San Francisco Bay Area accounted for most of the rest of California’s rankings in the top 100. San Francisco led the way among cities with nine of the top 100, and Los Angeles County claimed 18 of the top 100 ZIP codes among counties.

No ZIP codes from Sacramento, Fresno, Stanislaus or San Luis Obispo counties made the list.

Along with California, New York and Florida dominated most of the rest of the top 100, with ZIP codes from Washington, Nevada, New Jersey, Connecticut, Massachusets, Maryland and Hawaii also making the list.

The PropertyShark data compiled all real estate transactions closed in 2017, including single-family houses, duplexes, co-ops and condominiums. The list was compiled using median closing sale prices for each ZIP code.

California fared slightly better in the 2017 report than in 2016, when it accounted for 72 of the top 100 ZIP codes in the U.S.

Sue Yannaccone of ERA Real Estate, told The Los Angeles Times that home prices nationwide will keep going up in 2018 as the real estate market continues to recover.

The PropertyShark top 10 ZIP codes, showing town, county, state and median home sale prices for each:

Article source: https://www.sacbee.com/news/business/real-estate-news/article195199204.html

Posted in SF Bay Area News | Tagged | Leave a comment

New Bay Area housing trend: Living in the backyard

The walls weren’t even up yet on the granny flat Limei Huang is building in her San Jose backyard when people started lining up to rent the space.

The first offer came from the worker who laid the unit’s foundation. After his day’s work, he called Huang up and asked: When it’s finished, can I move in? Not long after, Huang brought in a painter. While he was giving her an estimate, he asked the same question. She had to tell him to get in line.

“I haven’t put it on the market,” said Huang, “and already people are looking for it.”

Huang is part of a growing group of Bay Area homeowners taking advantage of changing laws and an intense demand for housing by building small dwellings known as granny flats or in-law units in their backyards, converted basements or garages.

Cities around the Bay Area report a dramatic uptick in the number of people applying to build the units, with applications over the past year increasing by more than 1,000 percent in some places. Experts predict interest will grow even more this year as legislators and local cities continue to propose new, granny flat-friendly policies, possibly bringing some relief to the housing shortage that has driven the price of renting or buying a home through the roof.

“This is going to be a major piece of the solution to our housing crisis in the next decade,” said Matt Regan, senior vice president of public policy for the Bay Area Council.

The number of building permit applications San Jose received for in-law units, officially called accessory dwelling units, increased five-fold between 2015 and last year — jumping from 28 to 166 — according to a recent report from UC Berkeley’s Terner Center for Housing Innovation. In Oakland, the number of applications submitted during that time grew from 33 to 247. And in San Francisco they spiked from 41 to 593 — an increase of nearly 1,340 percent.

Adding a few hundred in-law units here and there won’t fix the region’s chronic housing shortage. But as support grows from state lawmakers, city leaders and the private sector, experts expect the Bay Area soon will have a sizable supply of these small houses. After Senate Bill 1069 became law last January, slashing the price for building an in-law unit by as much as $60,000 for some homeowners, the legislature this session will consider another bill that goes even further to remove hurdles from building the units. Meanwhile, cities from Oakland to San Jose have loosened their own restrictions.

All those changes have led to a booming business for Steve Vallejos of Valley Home Development, a Fairfield-based developer who specializes in in-law units. A year ago, his company was fielding one or two granny flat requests per month. One week into January, Vallejos already had five requests and expects the company probably will end the month with 11 or 12.

“The growth has been pretty dramatic,” Vallejos said.

Building a granny flat allowed 31-year-old Megan Kellogg to move back to the Richmond neighborhood where she grew up, a move she couldn’t otherwise afford. Kellogg, an opera singer, is finishing construction on a 300-square-foot unit in the backyard of her childhood home. When it’s complete, Kellogg’s mother will move into the unit, and Kellogg, her husband and their 3-year-old son will take her place in the main house.

“The opportunity was just too good to turn down,” said Kellogg, who had been living in Washington, D.C. before returning to Richmond. She spent about $88,000 on the project, and now plans to split the mortgage on the main house with her mother. It will be less than her family spent to rent a home on the East Coast.

7ae1c sjm l inlaw 0116 90 New Bay Area housing trend: Living in the backyard

Sen. Bob Wieckowski, D-Fremont, wants to help more people like Kellogg. A year ago, his first bill eased parking, zoning and lot-size requirements that, he said, were so cumbersome that few homeowners built in-law units  — at least, legally.

His new bill, introduced last week, would force cities to eliminate most of the fees they charge for construction of new in-law units, a shift Fremont made late last year. Such fees, charged for everything from utilities connections to schools, vary widely but can total tens of thousands of dollars and are often blamed for increasing the cost of housing. Many in-law units, the senator said, have been driven underground as a result. Senate Bill 831 also would create a temporary amnesty program for unpermitted in-law units.

“Let’s bring these people out of the darkness,” Wieckowski said, “and let them have a documented home that they’re paying taxes on.”

Wieckowski’s new legislation is certain to draw opposition from cities and others who see the proposal as a further erosion of local control over land use and planning amid the housing crisis. The measure further eases parking restrictions and requires cities to automatically approve an in-law unit application that has collected dust in a city office for 120 days.

In-law units can be an important tool for cities to address their housing shortages, said Jason Rhine, a lobbyist for the League of California Cities, which opposed Wieckowski’s 2016 pro-in-law unit bill. “Where we become concerned,” he said, “is when the state is trying to micromanage where and how.”

If the state prevents local governments from collecting fees, Rhine asked, how will a city pay for the services those new residents need?

The League urged Gov. Jerry Brown to veto Wieckowski’s first in-law unit bill, arguing that easing restrictions could lead to “impaired neighborhood character,” increase competition for parking spots, and threaten the privacy of existing homeowners.

For Huang, building an in-law unit to generate additional rental income seemed like a no-brainer. She hopes to put the 600-square-foot unit on the market in March, potentially charging about $2,000 a month. Now she’s adding the finishing touches. When it’s done, she estimates she will have spent about $100,000 and five months on the project, adding: “It’s been a lot easier than I would expect.”

Article source: https://www.mercurynews.com/2018/01/16/new-bay-area-housing-trend-living-in-the-backyard/

Posted in SF Bay Area News | Tagged | Leave a comment

Zillow names the 10 hottest housing markets in the US for 2018

San Jose, Calif. came in No. 1 in Zillow’s ranking of hottest housing markets, fueled by the still-booming tech companies of Silicon Valley.

Raleigh holds the No. 2 spot in Zillow’s annual prediction, with the Research Triangle powering much of the growth, based on its rising home values and rental prices, steady income growth, abundant job opportunities and low unemployment rate.

And Seattle, home to Amazon.com, came in No. 3 in Zillow’s analysis.

The top three housing markets in 2018 all have strong technology sectors, Zillow said.

Never miss a local story.

Sign up today for a free 30 day free trial of unlimited digital access.

A top ranking might not be a great thing if you’re buying a house: Prices are expected to keep rising faster than the national average.

Charlotte, boosted by the financial sector and a fast-rising population, came in just behind Seattle. San Francisco was No. 5, behind Charlotte.

Charlotte was ranked in the top 10 in another forecast for 2018, coming in at No. 7 in a Realtor.com prediction. Like many fast-growing cities, the housing market in Charlotte has been defined by tight inventory, rising prices and climbing rent. Charlotte’s prices are expected to keep rising faster than the national average, ticking up 4 percent.

More Videos

 Zillow names the 10 hottest housing markets in the US for 20182:21

 Zillow names the 10 hottest housing markets in the US for 20181:34

 Zillow names the 10 hottest housing markets in the US for 20182:23

 Zillow names the 10 hottest housing markets in the US for 20181:20

 Zillow names the 10 hottest housing markets in the US for 20181:15

 Zillow names the 10 hottest housing markets in the US for 20180:30

 Zillow names the 10 hottest housing markets in the US for 20181:35

 Zillow names the 10 hottest housing markets in the US for 20181:57

 Zillow names the 10 hottest housing markets in the US for 20180:54

 Zillow names the 10 hottest housing markets in the US for 20182:24

Ely Portillo explains the house flipping comeback

House-flipping is the hottest it’s been in a decade. But it’s nothing like you see on HGTV.

To predict the top 10 markets, Zillow calculated each metro’s home value and rent for 2018 in the 50 largest U.S. cities, recent income and population growth, unemployment rates and the number of job openings per person using Glassdoor, a job recruiting website.

The list ranks San Jose in the top spot for its high number of job openings per person and increasing home value, Zillow said.

“The tech industry continues to roar, attracting thousands of new residents per year to tech-dominant markets like Seattle, Denver and the Bay Area,” Terrazas said. “The higher cost of living in these areas is offset to a large degree by well-paying tech jobs.”

Southern cities made up half of the top 10. Other Southern cities that made list included Nashville, Tenn., Dallas and Austin, Texas.

“Growing cities in the Sun Belt, places like Raleigh, Charlotte and Nashville, offer plenty of opportunities healthcare and finance, while providing a less-expensive, but still-convenient, alternative to the larger and pricier markets in the Northeast,” said Zillow senior economist Aaron Terrazas, in a statement.

Zillow reported that Raleigh’s income grew by 9 percent last year and predicted its median home value in 2018 would be $233,900. The unemployment rate is 3.6 percent.

Here are the top 10 U.S. housing markets, as ranked by Zillow:

1. San Jose, Calif.

2. Raleigh

3. Seattle

4. Charlotte

5. San Francisco

6. Austin, Texas.

7. Denver

8. Nashville, Tenn.

9. Portland, Ore.

10. Dallas

Zillow is a national database for real estate and rental properties.

Article source: http://www.kansas.com/news/business/real-estate-news/article194706829.html

Posted in SF Bay Area News | Tagged | Leave a comment

Bay Area housing: Why does the supply keep shrinking?

(Click here, if you are unable to view this video on your mobile device.)

Bay Area housing trends are easily summarized: As the supply of available homes dries up, prices go up. It’s the law of supply and demand.

But why is the housing supply — insiders use the term “inventory” — so tight to begin with? And what can be done to expand the supply? For answers, we turned to Ralph McLaughlin, chief economist with Trulia, the residential real estate website.

McLaughlin, 36, is a former college professor who brings a conversational ease to subjects that might otherwise seem convoluted. He also has a keen sense of the Bay Area market: Raised in San Jose, he lives in Alameda in the East Bay, and he works in San Francisco, where Trulia is headquartered. For these reasons, we turned to him for the story behind the numbers.

This interview has been edited for clarity and length.

Q: In a nutshell, what was the story of Bay Area real estate in 2017?

A: It was yet another year of price appreciation outpacing income growth and falling inventory that doesn’t seem to be reversing course anytime soon. It’s the same story we’ve been hearing for the last three to four years, but it’s becoming increasingly problematic for homebuyers. They’re likely to be more frustrated than they’ve ever been.

And that keeps me up at night — being from the Bay Area, it’s very tough knowing so many childhood friends who no longer live here because they can’t afford it. Recent data show the average person moving into the Bay Area earns $8,500 more than the average person who leaves: $90,000 for those coming in and $81,500 for those going out. That’s strong evidence that many middle-income Bay Areans are being priced out and replaced by earners with higher paying jobs.

Q: Why does the region’s housing supply keep shrinking? We hear about year-over-year decreases of 30, 40 and even 50 percent or more in some parts of the region.

A: There are two reasons why inventory continues to fall and prices continue to rise, and the unfortunate reality is that the problem is likely to get worse before it gets better.

The first reason is that we just aren’t building enough homes. And building new homes is extremely important for inventory because they create a chain reaction effect: You build a new house, then someone buys that house, and the buyer likely sells their existing house, and the person who buys that house will sell their home. And that continues down the line until an investor or first-time homebuyer buys that house. So one new home may lead to a four-to-five-fold increase in existing inventory.

Second, the Bay Area — and San Jose in particular — has an aging population. Most homeowners are between 40 and 60 years old, and that’s a time in life when they’re less likely to move. This demographic is less likely to move because they have children in the house, or they have no incentive to move because retirement is imminent. So you have a demographic roadblock to expanding inventory.

Q: Let’s look ahead: What impact will the congressional tax overhaul have on the supply of Bay Area housing?

A: The tax plan may actually make the inventory problem worse. That’s because the cap on the mortgage interest deduction has been reduced from $1 million to $750,000. This is likely to slow the market for homes where homebuyers would have to take out a mortgage for more than this amount. In addition, because existing homeowners are grandfathered in at the $1 million level, they’ll be incentivized to stay put and not move.

Q: What are some policy changes that could expand the housing supply?

A: At the national level, we could incentivize investors who snapped up homes in 2012 – at the bottom of the housing market – to sell. Many of these homes, especially single-family ones, would otherwise be available stock for first-time homebuyers. So if we gave investors a one-time free pass on capital gains, they might put those homes on the market.

Q: But maybe they’d wind up being purchased by other investors.

A: Not likely. This isn’t a great time to be an investor in the Bay Area, so we would hope those properties would be bought up and occupied by families.

Q: Why isn’t it a great time to be an investor?

A: If I bought a house in 2012, the rent I would get on that house would have been enough to pay for the mortgage. If I bought a house today, that’s not as likely, even though rents have risen in the interim. This is because prices have risen much more relative to rents, and that makes investing in rental properties less attractive.

Q: Let’s hear a second policy that could help expand inventory.

A: We could do a better job at providing housing for those that need it most. While not a perfect market solution, preserving existing affordable housing, stabilizing rent growth, and otherwise promoting the development of below-market-rate units helps households who might have to otherwise migrate out of the region stay here. We could also do a better job at encouraging the development of market-rate units, and while they don’t directly benefit low-income households, doing so helps keep higher-income households from looking down market for homes.

Q: And what about the bubble? Will it burst?

A: I don’t think there’s a bubble at all because growth in the market is being driven by economic fundamentals: Strong job growth and low supply equals high prices. The best that we can hope for is that price growth moderates to a place that is closer to inflation and that wage growth slowly catches up. But that will take a long time, probably decades if things continue as they are. It’s taken decades to get us into this mess, and if we don’t step up our housing game soon, it could take us decades to get out.


Ralph McLaughlin profile

Place of residence: Alameda.

Position: Chief economist, Trulia.

Previous jobs: Land acquisitions analyst, Urban Arena, LLC, 2004-2008; assistant professor of urban planning, University of South Australia, 2009-2012; assistant professor and director of real estate development, San Jose State University, 2012-2014.

Education: University of California at Irvine, Ph.D. in planning, policy, and design, 2009; University of Arizona, bachelor of science in geography and regional development, 2003.

Family: Suzie, wife of 10 years, and their Brussels Griffons Bru (11) and Maisy (10).


Five facts about Ralph McLaughlin

1. Born and raised in San Jose, he graduated from Piedmont Hills High School in 1999. He lettered in baseball, football and water polo.

2. One of his first jobs as a teenager was slinging hot dogs at San Jose Municipal Stadium during San Jose Giants games. He then upgraded to valeting cars at the Hotel De Anza after the season was over.

3. One of his passionate hobbies is home brewing. In 2011, while living in Australia, he won the gold medal for best amateur-brewed IPA in the country.

4. He has broken a total of eight different bones over the years, primarily as a result of cycling, snowboarding and playing baseball.

5. He is distantly related to the English author Daniel Defoe, although he hasn’t yet read “Robinson Crusoe.”


Article source: https://www.mercurynews.com/2018/01/11/unpacking-the-bay-area-housing-market-why-does-the-inventory-keep-shrinking-and-will-prices-ever-gulp-go-down/

Posted in SF Bay Area News | Tagged | Leave a comment