5 signs that home prices could be rolling over again

There are growing signs that U.S. home prices are no longer rising. If this is indeed the case, now is the time for sellers or prospective sellers to take a good look at the state of housing markets around the country.  To make smart decisions, home sellers as well as buyers need to find out whether home price gains are simply slowing or whether housing markets are actually topping out.

An excellent publication,U.S. Home Sales Report, published by real-estate data firm Attom Data Solutions, gives a detailed look at conditions in major U.S. housing markets. This quarterly report provides data on the actual gross profit that sellers pocketed in 124 housing markets nationwide.  It tracks every home sold in that metro and compares the price to what the seller previously paid for the house. An average is then taken for all the homes sold in that quarter. The result is the average gross profit in each metro before commissions are deducted.

This data is extremely useful for prospective sellers because it tells them what kind of profit they can expect should they decide to sell their home. Sellers need this information to determine if they will have enough net profit, whether they’re looking to trade up or downsize.

Read: Home flipping rate hits 9-year high — and that could foretell troubles in the housing market

I compiled data from Attom Data’s U.S. Home Sales Report for the first quarter of 2019 into a table highlighting 12 major U.S. markets and what they reveal about home sales at four different points in time. These 12 major metros were chosen for geographic diversity.

d9e2c MW HK623 averag 20190531162502 NS 5 signs that home prices could be rolling over again

The percentage figures in the far right column show what the average gross profit was for homeowners who sold in the first quarter of 2019.  For example, in what had been the hottest market of them all — San Jose, Calif. (Silicon Valley) — homeowners who sold in the first quarter of this year realized an average gross profit of 84%. Yet had they sold a year earlier, the average gross profit would have been 103%. So the average gross profit on homes sold in San Jose has slipped almost 20 percentage points over the past year. In fact, the gross profit figure in this metro peaked at 114% in the second quarter of 2018. 

The second-hottest market in the nation was probably Seattle. Owners there who sold last quarter had an average gross profit of 63%. A year earlier, their profit would have been 72%. Gross profit in Seattle peaked at 78% in the second quarter of 2018.  Like San Jose, the average gross profit in Seattle has declined for three consecutive quarters.

In all except two of the metros covered in the table, homeowners would almost certainly have been better off had they sold a year ago rather than in this year’s first quarter.  

Yet what if these quarter-to-quarter comparisons are not trustworthy, since so much depends on the average length of time that sellers owned their property? That is a fair objection.  But consider this: Attom Data Solutions also publishes a quarterly report that calculates the average time sellers held their property. For the nation as a whole, the average tenure of ownership for sellers in the first quarter of 2019 was eight years. A year earlier, it was 7 ¾ years. We can reasonably conclude, then, that many sellers in the first quarter of 2019 bought their home around 2011.  

For most major metros, average prices in 2011 were lower than in 2010, when many who sold in 2018 bought their home. You might then assume that the average gross profit for the sellers in 2019 should have been greater than those who sold a year ago. Yet as the table shows, that did not happen in 10 of the highlighted 12 metros.

More: 10 bargain cities where you can get a mortgage for under $1,000

Five other key measures suggest that housing markets could be topping:

•     Home sales have been declining in many major metros

•       Listings of homes for sale have soared in the hottest markets

•       Reductions in asking prices have been increasing

•       Bidding wars prevalent in hot metros a year ago have all but disappeared

•       Standards for underwriting mortgages have plunged in the past year

Real estate brokerage Redfin’s most recent housing data is revealing. According to Redfin, the volume of home sales has been declining in major metros for almost a year. For example, many hot California metros showed double-digit sales declines in February and March from a year earlier.  In affluent Orange County, first-quarter home sales fell 20% from a year earlier and were the lowest since the housing collapse began in 2008.  Though not dangerous by itself, the weakness in home sales is a red flag.

Worse, the number of homes for sale is soaring in some of the hottest markets.  In March 2019, for example, listings were up 104% in San Jose from a year earlier, 83% in Seattle, 30% in Portland, and 24% in San Francisco.

Tumbling home sales along with substantial growth in the number of listings is a dangerous combination. If this trend continues, many sellers will be forced to lower their asking price.  This has already occurred in more expensive parts of Los Angeles and Fairfield County, Conn. Reductions in asking prices have also increased in New York City. Grant Long, senior economist at New York City online real estate marketplace StreetEasy, predicted in March: “When the inevitable wave of new inventory hits the [New York City] market this spring, interested buyers should expect to see an uptick in price cuts as the market forces ambitious sellers to accept reality.”

A fourth warning sign: In early May, Redfin reported that bidding wars — where sellers receive multiple offers on their property — have plunged across the U.S. in the past 12 months. In April 2018, Redfin agents had multiple offers on 60% of the homes they were showing. That figure collapsed to 15% by April 2019. Even the hot San Francisco Bay Area market saw a sharp drop in multiple offers, to 22% from 75%. 

Fifth, the standards for underwriting mortgages have sunk almost as low as what existed during the height of the property bubble madness in 2005-07. Because of these relaxed underwriting standards, about 3.3 million mortgages were originated between 2014 and 2018 that would have been denied under the tighter standards, the Urban Institute reports. Perhaps Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the dominant players in U.S. mortgage markets, decided that unless they lowered their standards, some housing markets might suffer due to a lack of qualified buyers.

Advice for home sellers and prospective sellers

A seller with an active listing do should consider that their local market is softer than they believe and that their asking price is too high. If the traffic of prospective buyers has been slow and the home has not sold for several months, they should talk with their broker about a price reduction. In a weakening market, this may be the only way to sell the house.

What about homeowners who postponed listing their house as prices rose? They need to reconsider this decision. If they believe that home prices may be heading lower for more than a brief period, the prudent action may be to put the home on the market now — before their market weakens further.  

Keep in mind that I am not saying home prices are about to plunge as they did in 2008-2011. Yet prudence would suggest that wise homeowners adjust their expectations and plans, in order to deal with any changes in their local housing market.

Keith Jurow is a real estate analyst who covers the bubble-era lending debacle and its aftermath. Contact him at www.keithjurow.com.

Read: Mortgage rates are dropping — so why aren’t more people buying homes?

More: Business conditions are at their worst level since the 2008 financial crisis, says Morgan Stanley            

We Want to
Hear from You

Join the conversation

Article source: https://www.marketwatch.com/story/5-signs-that-home-prices-could-be-rolling-over-again-2019-06-17

Posted in SF Bay Area News | Tagged | Leave a comment

Berkeley, Oakland Among Worst For First-Time Homebuyers In Survey Of 300 Cities

BERKELEY (CBS SF) – For people looking to buy a home for the first time, a survey reaffirms that the Bay Area may be one of the worst places to do so.

According to a new study by the personal finance website WalletHub, when accounting for a combination of cost of living, property crime rates and 25 other metrics, Berkeley was the worst city for new homeowners among 300 cities ranging in size.

Oakland was far down the list too at No. 297. Among other big cities, Oakland came in at 63rd of 64, only ahead of Detroit.

ALSO READ: Santa Cruz Housing Affordability For Teachers Called Worst In Nation

Plenty of other Bay Area cities rounded out the bottom of the list. Santa Rosa came in at 218, Antioch at 222, San Jose at 258 and San Francisco at 284.

Other findings included that San Francisco, Sunnyvale and Santa Clara were among six cities tied for the highest cost of living in the country. The five cities with the lowest ratio of median home value to median annual rent can also be found in the Bay Area: Berkeley, Fremont, San Mateo, Santa Clara and Sunnyvale.

ALSO READ: $61/Hour Wage Needed To Rent 2-Bedroom In San Francisco, $54/Hour In San Jose

Besides cost of living and property crime rates, other factors included real estate tax rates, median home price appreciation, weather and job market.

The full study can be found at https://wallethub.com/edu/best-and-worst-cities-for-first-time-home-buyers/5564/.

© Copyright 2019 CBS Broadcasting Inc. and Bay City News Service. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Article source: https://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/2019/07/10/berkeley-oakland-worst-cities-first-time-homebuyers-wallethub-survey/

Posted in SF Bay Area News | Tagged | Leave a comment

San Francisco median house price hits $1.7 million

Although the soaring price of buying a home in San Francisco has slowed—and even stalled—over the past year, momentum is still going, even if it’s measured in inches instead of yards.

That’s the assessment of SF-based real estate group Compass, which released a new market report covering Bay Area home sales in June.

According to Compass economist Patrick Carlisle, “Both houses and condos are basically back up to the peak prices they hit last year at this time. [...] Median home sales prices are much the same as last year, re-attaining, but so far, not exceeding previous peaks.”

That means that at the end of the second quarter, the median price for MLS listed single-family houses in SF hit $1.7 million, while condo prices hit $1.3 million, up $80K and $65K, respectively, compared to last year.

Looking back over the previous 12 months, the median house price in SF was $1.6 million—which isn’t even the most expensive area in the region. Atherton averaged $6.6 million during the same period, Los Altos Hills ran came in at $4.6 million, and Hillsborough at $4.2 million.

Conversely, Vallejo’s median house price came in at $415,000 during the same period, making the North Bay town the most affordable in the region. Pittsburgh and Vacaville both averaged roughly $450,000.

In San Francisco, the most affordable neighborhood was Bayview, with a median price of $912,500. The most expensive neighborhood was (what else?) Pac Heights, with $5.2 million.

Carlisle points the finger at a “confluence of positive economic factors” for agitating prices once again, including “unicorn IPOs [that] have begun to roll out after a media frenzy of speculation on their potential effects on the market.”

(Note: Employees at recently public companies are not yet allowed to sell the stock they own, but anticipation of the end of that lock-out period may push others to buy in the meantime.)

Just last month, Orange County-based firm Core Logic reported that SF’s median home prices (condos and houses combined) dropped year over year for the first time since 2017, declining four percent to roughly $1.32 million.

But that’s the nature of a volatile season; a small but significant drop one month and record-highs the next can all happen within the same market, especially since Core Logic’s analysis focuses on short-term, month-to-month activity, while Compass assesses trends over several months at once.

The California Association of Realtors hasn’t released its assessment of June SF housing sales yet, but the figures for May show a median price of more than $1.69 million.

Article source: https://sf.curbed.com/2019/7/10/20689307/median-home-price-house-sf-san-francisco-2019

Posted in SF Bay Area News | Tagged | Leave a comment

Bay Area renters’ giant game of musical chairs plays out online

Driven by steadily increasing rents, apartment dwellers are far more likely to seek housing on the other side of the bay, creating a huge game of musical chairs, according a recent survey.

The study this month by Apartment List describes a curious ping-pong-like phenomenon where renters, often forced to move by rising rents, are focusing their search for a new home in other Bay Area cities as opposed to decamping to further destinations such as Austin, Texas, or Seattle.

And as the trend accelerates, many of those doing the moving are sharing their stories — and their frustrations — online.

Readers of this newspaper said these rental trends are a symptom of a much larger and more ingrained problem. “The Bay Area,” wrote Paul, “already has TOO MANY houses. Traffic is awful; BART is stuffed like a sardine can; bureaucrats keep telling us to ‘spare the air’ and stop driving; and p.s.: there isn’t even enough water for the people already here.”

Others, like “HA2,” said more housing will help ease the pressure on renters. “It’s ridiculous how in so many of the places between SF and SJ it’s illegal to build apartment complexes to house … people,” the reader wrote. “With the number of jobs being created, we need lots more places to live than we have now.”

And “BayAreaGenX” suggested that authorities should “encourage companies to set up offices in areas where there is room to grow. Not even that far — like Stockton.”

One reader, who called themselves an “SF Peninsula native” now raising a family of four kids, said they “can’t quite the pull the trigger to leave,” adding that the Bay Area’s ”one-of-a-kind climate keeps me in place,” a sentiment undoubtedly shared by many area renters who are choosing to move across the bay or from San Francisco to San Jose instead of leaving the area. The reader blames much of the local housing problems on “venture capital sitting in Menlo Park and Palo Alto. Filthy-rich venture capitalists aren’t willing to go more than 50 miles to see how their unicorn investments are doing. If you want to fix that, somehow you’re going to have to attract venture capitalists to live outside of Menlo Park and Palo Alto. Not sure how you do that.”

On a Reddit post last week, a user named “logi9” reached out to Bay Area residents for some help. “I currently live in Sacramento and planning to move to Bay Area near end of July or beginning of August. My office is in Santa Clara and my wife works in Sausalito. We are looking at apartment in location like Burlingame/San Mateo/Foster City which are central to our work location.”

Other users weighed in with warnings, pointing out that BART does not travel to Sausalito and that the commute from the Peninsula north over the Golden Gate Bridge would be a killer, no matter what time of day you drove it. The exchange underscored some of the vexing challengers renters would have even if they were simply moving from, say, Willow Glen to South San Francisco.

On Twitter, symptoms of renters’ malaise could be found all over the place, with some apartment dwellers fearing upheaval in their lives just because the landlord was suddenly making improvements to the property.

And the renter’s dilemma, for many on social media, was simply the manifestation of the much larger issue of a growing wealth gap — especially in places such as the Bay Area.

And some users said many renters criss-crossing the bay in search of an affordable place to live were on a fool’s errand.


Article source: https://www.mercurynews.com/2019/07/08/bay-area-renters-giant-game-of-musical-chairs-plays-out-online/

Posted in SF Bay Area News | Tagged | Leave a comment

North Bay commercial real estate transactions for July 8, 2019

Here are the latest business leads from commercial real estate leases and sales in San Francisco North Bay counties of Sonoma, Marin and Napa.

LEASES

square footage at address, city; property type; tenant; procuring agent; owner; listing agent; deal date (occupancy/effective date)

MARIN COUNTY

1,800sf at 505 San Marin Drive, #180B, Novato; office; Underground GIS; na; 505 San Marin Drive LLC; Nathan Ballard Theo Banks of KC; June 6

SONOMA COUNTY

41,817sf at 1388 Copperhill Parkway, Santa Rosa; industrial land lease (0.96 acres); Signature Coast Holdings LLC; Nathan Coogan Brian Keegan of KC; Sweetwater LLC; Nathan Coogan of KC; May 20

7,040sf at 101 Grant Ave., #D, Healdsburg; industrial; Crown Wine Shipping; na; Kantock Laier; Peter Briceno of KC; May 9

4,922sf at 1401 Corporate Center Parkway, Santa Rosa; office, extension; Osiris Ventures Inc.; na; Gene Toschi; Shawn Johnson of KC; May 9

4,500sf at 324 Yolanda Ave., #C, Santa Rosa; industrial; JW Flooring Inc.; na; Allan Henderson Trust; Russ Mayer of KC; May 16

3,800sf at 2999 Cleveland Ave., #C, Santa Rosa; office; Eduardo Reyes Marissa Barajas; Kevin Doran of KC; Mahaveer LLC; Jim Sartain Rhonda Deringer of KC; June 4

3,400sf at 3059 Coffey Lane, Santa Rosa; retail; California Erudite Ventures; Stephen Skinner of KC; Richard Porterfield; Stephen Skinner of KC; June 19

2,851sf at 100 Stony Point Road, #100, Santa Rosa; office, sublease; Volt Information Systems; na; Holley MSD; Shawn Johnson of KC; May 8

2,389sf at 100 Stony Point Road, #185, Santa Rosa; office; Vivint Solar Developer LLC; na; SR Stony Point DE LLC; Shawn Johnson, Dave Peterson Brian Keegan of KC; April 23

2,358sf at 963 Transport Way, #10 11, Petaluma; industrial; Oscar Rojas; Robby Burroughs of KC; Nanrob Properties; Sara Wann of KC; May 24

1,792sf at 412 Aviation Blvd., #D, Santa Rosa; office; DesignScapes LLC; Shawn Johnson James Nobles of KC; Thomas McLaughlin; Shawn Johnson James Nobles of KC; June 3

1,787sf at 191 Lynch Creek Way, #101, Petaluma; office, sublease; Evolve Restorative Center; Dave Peterson of KC; Microtone Audiology Inc.; Nathan Coogan of KC; May 22

1,394sf at 1813 Empire Industrial Court, Santa Rosa; industrial; Exordium Concepts LLC; Brian Keegan Stephen Skinner of KC; JRR Associates LLC; Peter Briceno Dino D of KC’Argenzio of KC; May 6

1,334sf at 5625 State Farm Drive, #47 49, Rohnert Park; industrial; Shea Cannon; Peter Briceno of KC; New California Land Co.; Peter Briceno Kevin Doran of KC; March 27

1,270sf at 1940 Piner Road, #600, Santa Rosa; retail; China Bowl; Annette Cooper of KC; Romero Investment; Annette Cooper of KC; May 16

1,200sf at 399 Business Park Court, #307, Windsor; industrial; SVG Global Inc.; Russ Mayer of KC; Latitude 45 Inc.; Russ Mayer of KC; April 4

SALES

square footage at address, city; property type; buyer; procuring agent; seller; listing agent; close of escrow; value

MARIN COUNTY

114,000sf at 1 3 Harbor Drive, Sausalito; office (The Harbors); Seagate Properties; na; One/Three Harbor Investors LLC (Roseview-PMRG Fund I LLC); Michel Seifer, Rob Hielscher, Kristina Wollan Erik Hanson of JLL; June 26; $52,650,000

2,544sf at 1925 E. Francisco Blvd., #5 16, San Rafael; office industrial; 5 Corners LLC; Theo Banks of KC; Shoja Management Company LLC; na; June 14; $879,000

?Send commercial real estate transactions to transactions@busjrnl.com. A compilation for the last 12 months is available for $45 by calling 707-521-5270.

Brokerage abbreviations: ACRES = ACRES Real Estate Services; CW = Cushman Wakefield; KC = Keegan Coppin Co. Inc./Oncor International; KWC = KW Commercial; MC = Meridian Commercial

Article source: https://www.northbaybusinessjournal.com/industrynews/realestate/9766165-181/north-bay-commercial-real-estate

Posted in SF Bay Area News | Tagged | Leave a comment