Will Bay Area exodus grow with fires and blackouts?

CLICK HERE if you are having a problem viewing the photos on a mobile device

Evacuations, intermittent blackouts, swaths of destroyed homes and apartments — the equation for buying a Bay Area home may be changing with more intense fire seasons.

Past Wine Country fires have crunched the already tight housing supply, driving up rents and mortgages, and pushed the lowest earners even farther outside the region or stacked into San Francisco and East Bay housing.

The Kincade Fire in Sonoma County forced nearly 200,000 evacuations. The turmoil and heartbreak may crack the patience of already taxed Bay Area and Wine Country residents and lead to a hastened exodus and reluctance to buy homes.

“The marks and scars of these fires are quite deep,” said George Ratiu, senior economist with Realtor.com.

But history and interviews with locals suggest many are willing to stay in their besieged communities and return to their jobs, families and the place they call home.

Record-setting fires have ripped through Northern California in the last three years, destroying lives and property. The Tubbs and Camp fires in 2017 and 2018 caused more than 100 deaths, destroyed 24,000 homes and commercial buildings and uprooted thousands of residents.

This year, the Kincade Fire has decimated more than 75,000 largely undeveloped acres. PGE blackouts blinkered power on and off throughout the region for much of October. Southern California is burning as well, forcing more evacuations.

Economists and disaster experts say the cycle from previous disasters is likely to repeat: an immediate increase in housing prices, rising steadily for six-to-nine months before resetting back to pre-disaster levels. The decimation of homes and apartments will compound the state’s housing shortage.

Higher housing prices in fire-damaged counties are expected to spread to nearby communities, Ratiu said. “That’s something we’ve seen in every one of the significant fires,” he said.

Tom Jeffery, senior hazard scientist with real estate data firm CoreLogic, said California residents have been willing to return to high-risk fire zones. He noted that large subdivisions in Southern California now rest on property decimated by blazes just 15 years earlier.

“It’s really about the resilience of the homeowner or the business owner,” Jeffery said.

Jeffery said blazes have grown more powerful. Intense weather brought on by climate change has put more people and property at risk, with high gusts carrying embers as far as two miles away.

Fire officials are signaling that increased risk by ordering the evacuations of hundreds of thousands of residents. “That’s really sending a message,” Jeffery said.

The developing annual ritual of blackouts, air masks and evacuations may be the tipping point for some residents.

A steady rise in Bay Area home prices since 2012, coupled with traffic and other high costs, have created a rush for the exit ramps. Silicon Valley lost 22,300 residents last year, replaced by nearly as many foreign immigrants settling into the region, according to a recent study by Joint Venture Silicon Valley.

Jeff Tucker, an economist with Zillow, said it’s unclear how much PGE’s planned blackouts will hurt home values, because there’s “no precedent” in the U.S. for property owners losing regular access to electricity. Tucker believes most people will dismiss the blackouts as an inconvenience.

The risk remains high for homes in Napa and Sonoma counties. Nearly 10,000 homes in Sonoma are in high or very high risk fire zones, with an estimated value of about $10 billion, according to a Zillow estimate based on real estate data and U.S. Forest Service designations.

Approximately 2,000 homes in Napa are in similar high risk fire zones, with an estimated combined worth of $3 billion, according to the Zillow analysis. The average cost of homes in the very high risk areas, typically hillside estates, was more than $1 million in Sonoma and $1.6 million in Napa — far more than the $629,000 median value in Sonoma and $668,000 in Napa.

“This will be a permanent risk, and you’ll be rolling the dice every year,” Tucker said. “And a lot of times they’ll come up snake eyes.”

Wine Country residents say they understand the growing risk, and some have considered moving.

George, a home builder who asked to be identified by only his first name, moved himself and his company to Santa Rosa nine months ago. The builder was in the middle of a $4 million custom home project when the owners, spooked by the fires, told him to pause.

He is reconsidering his decision to move. “People are realizing that even if your area wasn’t affected by this fire, it just as easily could have been,” he said.

During the 2017 Tubbs Fire, Janine and Steve Lowery woke up in their home in the foothills near Santa Rosa to car horns honking. They spotted a wall of glowing orange flames engulfing their neighbor’s home and encroaching the creek behind their house.

“There’s a difference between being evacuated and running for your life,” Janine Lowery said. Despite their brush with disaster, the couple elected to stay put during the Kincade Fire.

They spent more than eight hours every day and night hosing down their fences, trees and the roof of their home. By Wednesday, they felt as if they were almost safe.

“A lot of anxiety goes with all of this,” Janine said. “Because of the Tubbs Fire, we know how fast this can all go.”

The two lifelong Santa Rosa residents chuckled when asked if they would ever consider leaving. “Oh,” Janine said, “it’s never even crossed our minds.”


Article source: http://www.mercurynews.com/will-bay-area-exodus-grow-with-fires-and-blackoutske-bay-area-less-desirable

Posted in SF Bay Area News | Tagged | Leave a comment

Bay Area home to 55 of the nation’s 125 most expensive ZIP codes

Of the nation’s 125 most expensive ZIP codes for home-sale prices this year, 13 are in San Francisco (the most of any city), 55 are in the Bay Area and 91 are in California, according to a Chronicle analysis of an annual ranking by real estate website PropertyShark.

Atherton’s 94027 had the highest median price for the third year in a row, hitting $7.05 million in the first 10 months of the year, up 5.2% from $6.7 million last year. Palo Alto’s 94301 ranked seventh on this year’s list with a median sales price of $3.52 million; that’s down 6.2% from last year when it ranked sixth at $3.76 million.

San Francisco’s top 13 ZIPs showed up in all four quadrants of the city, although only one — 94110, which includes the Mission and Bernal Heights — is in the southeast corner.

The highest-priced ZIP in San Francisco was 94123, spanning the Marina, Cow Hollow and parts of Pacific Heights. Its median price, $2 million, placed only 38th nationally. That was tied with Redwood City’s 94062 — up two spots from last year, despite a 3% dip in its median.

 Bay Area home to 55 of the nation’s 125 most expensive ZIP codes

Of the nation’s top 35 ZIP codes, seven were in Santa Clara County (two in Palo Alto, two in Los Altos, and one each in Los Gatos, Stanford and Saratoga), four in San Mateo County (Atherton, Portola Valley, Burlingame, Menlo Park) and three in Marin County (Ross, Stinson Beach and Belvedere-Tiburon).

The main reasons California and especially the Bay Area dominate the ZIP list are high incomes and inadequate housing supply. “Incomes in the Bay Area are very high. The unicorns (private companies with $1 billion-plus valuations) are paying enormous amounts of money to engineers out of school. I don’t know if that’s going to last forever,” said Richard Green, director of the University of Southern California Lusk Center for Real Estate. “Another reason incomes in the Bay Area are so high is that people with low incomes have left.”

As for supply, “if you look at new construction in California, there just isn’t a lot. Even if you compare it to Portland (Ore.) and Seattle, on a per-capita basis,” the San Francisco, Los Angeles and San Diego metro areas are not building as much.

The report, posted Monday, tries to rank the top 100 ZIP codes, but because of ties the list came to 125 this year. That compares to 117 last year, when 48 Bay Area ZIPs made the list.

This year’s report covered transactions closed between Jan. 1 and Nov. 5 including single-family homes, duplexes, condos and co-ops. It ignored ZIP codes with fewer than three transactions. It excluded Contra Costa as a Bay Area county; we included it.

After Atherton, the most expensive ZIP codes nationwide were 11962 in New York’s Suffolk County, at $4.3 million; Santa Monica’s 90402, at $4.15 million, and 90210 in Beverly Hills, with a median price of $4.08 million.

It’s important to note that ZIP codes usually don’t align with city limits or neighborhood boundaries. They may combine higher-priced with lower-priced areas. For example, 94115 includes both Pacific Heights and parts of the less-tony Western Addition. With a median price of $1.75 million, it ranked 58th on this year’s list. Burlingame’s 19th-ranked 94010 gets a boost from high-priced Hillsborough.

Atherton spans two ZIP codes. If you look exclusively at homes within its city limits, the median home price there was a whopping $8.1 million in the first half of this year, according to separate data from CoreLogic.

Atherton has surged far ahead of its high-priced peers. It’s zoned entirely single-family, has a minimum 1-acre lot size, plenty of flat land and a streamlined permitting process. That and its proximity to Stanford University, downtown Menlo Park and Silicon Valley, has led to the destruction of merely large homes for the construction of monster mega-mansions in recent years. Warriors guard Stephen Curry and his wife, Ayesha, bought a home for $31 million there, the highest price paid for a house in the Bay Area this year.

Although the Bay Area continues to dominate the PropertyShark rankings, it hasn’t been immune to a slowdown in housing prices. Of the 46 Bay Area ZIP codes that were on its list both this year and last, 25 went down in price, 19 went up and two were unchanged, according to a Chronicle analysis.

Percentage-wise, the two biggest gainers were in Marin County. The median sales price in 94970, surrounding Stinson Beach, soared by one-third to $2.8 million. The median price in 94957, centered in Ross, jumped 31.4% to $3.35 million; it catapulted 13 places in the national rankings to 10th.

Tales of the

housing crisis

Whether you are a buyer, a seller, a renter, a landlord, a builder or an investor, the availability and affordability of housing is a major concern. As part of its continuing coverage, The Chronicle wants to hear the story of your housing experience.

Tell us your story: www.sfchronicle.com/housingstories

  Complete coverage: sfchronicle.com/bayareahousingcrisis

  Interactive look at the Bay Area housing market: sfchronicle.com/housing-crunch

The biggest price decline was in 94043, the Mountain View ZIP code that is largely commercial and includes Google headquarters. The median price there fell 11% to $1.47 million. San Carlos’ 94070 had the next biggest drop, falling 8.9% to $1.73 million.

In a separate report issued Monday, the California Association of Realtors noted that the Bay Area has posted year-over-year price declines for nine consecutive months and 10 of the last 11.

The median price paid for an existing, single-family home in October was $940,000, up 6.8% from September but down 2% from last year. It was the only region in California with a year-over-year decline last month.

The report does not include condos, new construction or transactions not reported on a Multiple Listing Service.

Price performance in the Bay Area ranged from a 9.3% increase year-over-year in Solano County to a 4.3% decline in Santa Clara County. Prices declined 1.8% in San Mateo County and 3.6% in Marin. They rose in all other Bay Area counties. San Francisco’s median price rose to $1.65 million, up 7.1% from September and up 3.1% year over year.

Kathleen Pender is a San Francisco Chronicle columnist. Email: kpender@sfchronicle.com Twitter: @kathpender

Article source: https://www.sfchronicle.com/business/networth/article/Bay-Area-home-to-55-of-the-nation-s-125-most-14843838.php

Posted in SF Bay Area News | Tagged | Leave a comment

I sold my San Francisco rental property for $2.75 million just 2 years ago, and now I’m convinced it’s once again the right time to buy real estate

  • In 2017, I sold the San Francisco rental property I’d owned for years for $2.75 million. Investing the proceeds provided enough passive income to allow me to be a stay-at-home dad.
  • Now, just a few years later, I’m again feeling bullish on real estate. I think now is the time to buy something else.
  • Prices have softened all across the US, mortgage rates have collapsed, and the stock market is back to an all-time high. Plus, rents continue to tick up, wage growth is reaching new highs, and the next recession won’t be as severe as the last one.
  • However, I’d love for those of you who are bearish to blow my arguments to smithereens.
  • Read more personal finance coverage.

Back in 2017, I had a very difficult decision to make. My rowdy tenants gave notice and I had to decide whether to sell my rental property or try and find new tenants.

The house had been rented between 2014 – 2017 for $8,200 – $8,800 a month. But when I went to find new tenants at a similar rent in 2017, none were to be found. Instead, I got a couple of offers for only $7,500 a month after 45 days of looking.

Because my tenant situation gave me stress and my son was just born, I really felt that 2017 was a good time to sell. Further, I was running up against the $500,000 tax-free profit exclusion limit.

Earlier, in 2012, I had tried to sell the house for $1.7 million and received zero offers. My agent at the time told me one couple was looking to lowball me at $1.5 million and I told them don’t bother. Fast forward five years, I was able to find my one and only offer for $2.75 million so I took it.

After paying fees, taxes, and the $815,000 mortgage, I was left with about $1,800,000 in proceeds. Over the next 60 days, I invested $600,000 into dividend-paying stocks, $600,000 into California municipal bonds, $550,000 into real estate crowdfunding, and left ~$50,000 in cash.

So far, the reinvested proceeds have done well. But most of all, the reinvested proceeds have provided a greater amount of passive income with minimal work on my part. I’m extremely thankful I was able to free up time since mid-2017 to be a stay at home dad.

I’m also thankful to the Financial Samurai community for sharing their thoughts about whether or not to sell back in 2017. After over 1,000 votes, 75% of you said sell, which gave me added confidence to let my once beloved property go.

In this post, I will argue that a golden opportunity to buy real estate is once again upon us. My spidey senses are telling me it’s time to buy at least one property before January 1, 2021.

After I finish telling you why I’m getting bullish on real estate, I’d love for those of you who are bearish to blow my arguments to smithereens.

Why It’s time to buy property again:

Article source: https://www.businessinsider.com/now-is-the-time-to-buy-san-francisco-real-estate-2019-10

Posted in SF Bay Area News | Tagged | Leave a comment

Bay Area leads the nation in million-dollar homes

The online loan marketplace Lending Tree calculated which U.S. cities . The results will surprise few who follow the Bay Area housing market: San Jose came in at No. 1 on the list, with San Francisco at No. 2.

“Only 5.86 percent of the owner-occupied homes in the nation’s 50 largest metros are valued at $1 million or more,” says economist Tendayi Kapfidze, noting that most Americans would consider a seven-figure home “excessive.”

But in San Jose, the total number of homes valued at least $1 million is 208,745, or 54.46 percent of the total stock.

In SF that figure comes to 42.39 percent, or 395,858 homes. Note that these numbers reflect home values and not the market prices they’re selling at these days.

Lending Tree’s conclusions might be a source of confusion since according to SF’s most recent Housing Inventory Report, released in March, there aren’t even 395,000 homes in the entire city.

The reason why? When statisticians talk about San Francisco, they refer to the larger SF-Oakland-Hayward census area—which encompasses almost all of the Bay Area except for the South Bay and wine country. The San Jose census tract includes the rest of Santa Clara County and San Benito County as well.

For SF alone, U.S. Census estimates for 2018 value the average home at more than $1.19 million. The census says that more than two-thirds of SF homes are worth $1 million or more.

However, these figures only represent owner-occupied units. Most of San Francisco’s occupied housing stock (more than 62 percent) is renter-occupied.

In 2017, the median home value was scarcely more than $1.1 million. And in 2016 that figure dropped to $1.02 million, the first year that the owner-occupied average crossed the $1 million mark.

In 2015, the median value came in at $941,400. And back in 2010, during the most recent full census, it was just $768,000.

For context, on Lending Tree’s list, third-place LA’s million-dollar housing stock comes in at a touch over 19 percent. San Diego comes in fourth place San Diego with 14.12 percent.

The LA metro area leads the nation in the number of units valued at at least seven figures (with more than 400,000), but this represents a small slice of the city’s overall housing inventory.

Article source: https://sf.curbed.com/2019/11/15/20966966/bay-area-leads-the-nation-in-million-dollar-homes

Posted in SF Bay Area News | Tagged | Leave a comment

Bay Area leads the nation in million-dollar homes

The online loan marketplace Lending Tree calculated which U.S. cities . The results will surprise few who follow the Bay Area housing market: San Jose came in at No. 1 on the list, with San Francisco at No. 2.

“Only 5.86 percent of the owner-occupied homes in the nation’s 50 largest metros are valued at $1 million or more,” says economist Tendayi Kapfidze, noting that most Americans would consider a seven-figure home “excessive.”

But in San Jose, the total number of homes valued at least $1 million is 208,745, or 54.46 percent of the total stock.

In SF that figure comes to 42.39 percent, or 395,858 homes. Note that these numbers reflect home values and not the market prices they’re selling at these days.

Lending Tree’s conclusions might be a source of confusion since according to SF’s most recent Housing Inventory Report, released in March, there aren’t even 395,000 homes in the entire city.

The reason why? When statisticians talk about San Francisco, they refer to the larger SF-Oakland-Hayward census area—which encompasses almost all of the Bay Area except for the South Bay and wine country. The San Jose census tract includes the rest of Santa Clara County and San Benito County as well.

For SF alone, U.S. Census estimates for 2018 value the average home at more than $1.19 million. The census says that more than two-thirds of SF homes are worth $1 million or more.

However, these figures only represent owner-occupied units. Most of San Francisco’s occupied housing stock (more than 62 percent) is renter-occupied.

In 2017, the median home value was scarcely more than $1.1 million. And in 2016 that figure dropped to $1.02 million, the first year that the owner-occupied average crossed the $1 million mark.

In 2015, the median value came in at $941,400. And back in 2010, during the most recent full census, it was just $768,000.

For context, on Lending Tree’s list, third-place LA’s million-dollar housing stock comes in at a touch over 19 percent. San Diego comes in fourth place San Diego with 14.12 percent.

The LA metro area leads the nation in the number of units valued at at least seven figures (with more than 400,000), but this represents a small slice of the city’s overall housing inventory.

Article source: https://sf.curbed.com/2019/11/15/20966966/bay-area-leads-the-nation-in-million-dollar-homes

Posted in SF Bay Area News | Tagged | Leave a comment