1.1-acre underwater property listing makes splash in San Francisco real estate market – KGO

SAN FRANCISCO (KGO) — Some of society’s most unusual ideas have turned out to be money-makers. It’s a truism that one San Francisco real estate agent is banking on this summer, as he tries to sell a 1.1-acre lot underneath the San Francisco Bay.

In a city where real estate prices often seem irrational, the listing certainly offers an affordable alternative for bargain hunters.

To see the vacant lot, you have to cross some natural barriers.

The space is clearly off the beaten path, but offers you a chance to do some recreational fishing.

RELATED: ‘Last unicorn’ of Bay Area real estate listed at $25M

And for the weather? Sunny and mild with some amazing views.

The only caveat is that the 1.1-acre lot is underwater, located three city blocks east of Candlestick Park.

The property was purchased several years ago by Trent Zhu.

VIDEO: Historic Victorian home moved in process that SF hasn’t seen in 47 years

We asked the owner what he planned to do with it when he originally bought the land.

A real estate agent by day, Zhu recalls he had no plans for the lot at that time; it was a good deal.

“I haven’t seen the property myself,” Zhu says.

He bought his land from San Francisco County at an auction about six years ago, for less than $5,000. The asking price today is $75,000.

So far Zhu has no takers, but people are certainly curious.

Resident Mary Gutekanst had no response when asked if she would consider purchasing the property, except for a roaring laugh.

RELATED: Take a look inside California’s ‘Flintstone House’ in 1987

“Maybe build above sea level and put it on stilts or something you know,” says Mark Corsetti, who knows the area well.

Zhu hopes that another pier could be added to San Francisco’s waterfront.

“Like a pier, a stadium,” the owner suggested.

A stadium, did he say? That may be a good investment, since a certain baseball team is now threatening to build a ballpark outside of Oakland.

Here’s another disclosure; Zhu owns several other lots underwater.

VIDEO: ‘Floating Home’: Look inside houseboat up for $1.8 million cash in San Francisco

“It’s just one at a time, if someone wants to buy more, I can sell more, this is only one,” the property agent clarified.

For now, Zhu says he’s just testing the waters.

“It’s owning a piece of San Francisco, and buy into the future,” he added.

Nothing like a good sales pitch.

Article source: https://abc7news.com/underwater-property-sale-sf-candlestick-water-lot-real-estate-news-housing-market/10621611/

Posted in SF Bay Area News | Tagged | Leave a comment

1.1-acre underwater property listing makes splash in San Francisco real estate market – WABC

SAN FRANCISCO — Some of society’s most unusual ideas have turned out to be money-makers. It’s a truism that one San Francisco real estate agent is banking on this summer, as he tries to sell a 1.1-acre lot underneath the San Francisco Bay.

In a city where real estate prices often seem irrational, the listing certainly offers an affordable alternative for bargain hunters.

To see the vacant lot, you have to cross some natural barriers.

The space is clearly off the beaten path, but offers you a chance to do some recreational fishing.

RELATED: ‘Last unicorn’ of Bay Area real estate listed at $25M

And for the weather? Sunny and mild with some amazing views.

The only caveat is that the 1.1-acre lot is underwater, located three city blocks east of Candlestick Park.

The property was purchased several years ago by Trent Zhu.

VIDEO: Historic Victorian home moved in process that SF hasn’t seen in 47 years

We asked the owner what he planned to do with it when he originally bought the land.

A real estate agent by day, Zhu recalls he had no plans for the lot at that time; it was a good deal.

“I haven’t seen the property myself,” Zhu says.

He bought his land from San Francisco County at an auction about six years ago, for less than $5,000. The asking price today is $75,000.

So far Zhu has no takers, but people are certainly curious.

Resident Mary Gutekanst had no response when asked if she would consider purchasing the property, except for a roaring laugh.

RELATED: Take a look inside California’s ‘Flintstone House’ in 1987

“Maybe build above sea level and put it on stilts or something you know,” says Mark Corsetti, who knows the area well.

Zhu hopes that another pier could be added to San Francisco’s waterfront.

“Like a pier, a stadium,” the owner suggested.

A stadium, did he say? That may be a good investment, since a certain baseball team is now threatening to build a ballpark outside of Oakland.

Here’s another disclosure; Zhu owns several other lots underwater.

VIDEO: ‘Floating Home’: Look inside houseboat up for $1.8 million cash in San Francisco

“It’s just one at a time, if someone wants to buy more, I can sell more, this is only one,” the property agent clarified.

For now, Zhu says he’s just testing the waters.

“It’s owning a piece of San Francisco, and buy into the future,” he added.

Nothing like a good sales pitch.

Article source: https://abc7ny.com/underwater-property-sale-sf-candlestick-water-lot-real-estate-news-housing-market/10621611/

Posted in SF Bay Area News | Tagged | Leave a comment

Could the Bay Area solve its housing crisis by building in city centers? An S.F. group thinks so

This is just a narrow slice of the vision laid out in a series of 26 reports by the urban think tank SPUR, set to be released Thursday. The 50-year “regional strategy,” Bay Area 2070, attempts to redesign the region by looking at housing, transportation, growth, racial equity and climate. It includes 175 policy recommendations on everything from rent control to rapid bus lines to protecting against sea level rise.

The ambitious SPUR project, the result of three years of work by the San Francisco group, starts with the premise that over the next 50 years the nine-county Bay Area will grow by 4 million residents and need 2.2 million new housing units. Under the current land-use approaches taken by the cities and counties in the region, it’s likely that about 1.4 million homes would be produced, and much of that would be put in the wrong places — farmland and open areas that are far from transit, SPUR said.

The SPUR reports compare two scenarios: “business as usual,” based on current zoning and land-use patterns; and a “new civic vision,” which imagines a more equitable and sustainable region with reformed land-use regulations.

“The motivation for the project was recognizing that all of the things we experience as challenges are the result of systems we created,” said Alicia John-Baptiste, SPUR’s CEO. “If we want a different future we need to be intentional about designing that future. We wanted to be as aspirational as possible and set aside current political constraints.”

 Could the Bay Area solve its housing crisis by building in city centers? An S.F. group thinks so

According to SPUR, the “business as usual” approach would result in 358,000 new housing units and office space for 646,000 workers being plopped down in hazardous and protected areas — such as farmland and low-lying waterfront areas. But the SPUR scenario would add almost no new jobs or housing in these zones. SPUR estimates that 500,000 new homes could be built in transit-oriented downtowns and another 543,000 units could be built along major commercial corridors such as El Camino Real on the Peninsula, Geary Boulevard in San Francisco and San Pablo Avenue and International Boulevard in the East Bay.

The “business as usual” planning would result in about 850,000 jobs in transit-friendly, walkable neighborhoods while the SPUR approach would add about 2 million jobs in those areas. SPUR calculates that about 523,000 units could be added in smaller buildings — two- to six-unit constructs — in areas currently zoned for single-family homes.

SPUR board member Robert A. Wilkins Sr., a management consultant and former longtime CEO of the YMCA of the East Bay, said the strategy’s goals on housing — increased density near jobs and transit — is not breaking new ground. But the difference is that the strategy is “people centered.”

The report delves into how to stop evictions, how to build less expensive affordable housing and how to strengthen tenant protections. It explores creating a real-estate transfer tax that penalizes short-term “flipping,” expanding homeownership opportunities for low- and moderate-income families and reforming construction defect laws that make many builders reluctant to construct condos.

“I always start with the question — who are we doing this for? Cities are for people, and the notion is to create an environment in which everybody can flourish,” Wilkins said. “We have some of the greatest prosperity in the world and on the other hand we have some of the greatest poverty. Let’s start out by looking at the gaps. Historically, how did we get here and who has been left behind?”

Nothing in the SPUR vision will come easy — many of its goals have long been crusades for Bay Area housing and tenant advocates but have faced severe backlash from voters and elected officials. For example, SPUR calls for the reform of the state’s environmental review process — a set of laws that opponents regularly use to delay or kill new housing — that multiple lawmakers have failed to get done over the past two decades. It advocates for cheaper modular housing to become the norm, something that building trade unions are battling against.

The SPUR report is careful not to call for the overdevelopment of “communities of concern” — traditionally working-class, Black and brown neighborhoods vulnerable to displacement and gentrification. The “new civic vision” would add slightly less overall housing within these communities compared to continuing business as usual.

Tomiquia Moss, a SPUR board member and CEO of All Home, said the 50-year plan imagines a “more equitable and just Bay Area” where homelessness is eradicated and “housing is seen as a right.” The lengthy horizon makes sense given that the crises facing the region — housing, homelessness, traffic gridlock — took at least that long to develop, she said.

One of the report’s authors, Stephen Engblom, executive vice president of the architecture and engineering firm AECOM, said he and his fellow researchers challenged themselves to reimagine suburban places like shopping centers and office parks, many of which have high vacancies, as well as downtown areas that suffered as retail moved into malls and big box stores on the edge of town.

“A lot of time when you think about urban growth, you think of downtown San Francisco, downtown Oakland and downtown San Jose,” Engblom said. “But those make up a very small portion of our land in the Bay Area. We asked how every place type can fulfill its responsibility, to evolve into their best self. There is so much land that is inefficiently used right now.”

J.K. Dineen is a San Francisco Chronicle staff writer. Email: jdineen@sfchronicle.com Twitter: @sfjkdineen

Article source: https://www.sfchronicle.com/local/article/Could-the-Bay-Area-solve-its-housing-crisis-by-16172573.php

Posted in SF Bay Area News | Tagged | Leave a comment

Real estate: Silicon Valley, East Bay office markets fare better than San Francisco

SAN JOSE — The Bay Area’s three major office markets have all been weakened by coronavirus-linked ailments, but San Francisco appears to have fared much worse than the markets in the San Jose and Oakland metro areas, commercial real estate surveys show.

Subleases are increasing, vacancy levels are rising, and rents are flat or lower in all three markets — but San Francisco’s office market problems are more pronounced than is the case for the Oakland area or the South Bay, according to recent reports from two commercial real estate firms, Kidder Mathews and Colliers.

Sublease space is increasing at a quick pace in San Francisco as tech companies and other firms chop their operations in that city. However, sublease vacancies have also marched higher in the Oakland area and the San Jose metro region, the two firms report.

During the one-year period that ended in March, the amount of San Francisco’s empty sublease office space rocketed higher by 185%, Kidder Mathews reported.

Over the similar year-long stretch ending in March, sublease vacancies increased by 100% in Oakland-Berkeley-Alameda-Emeryville, according to a Colliers report for the first quarter of 2021. In the South Bay, sublease vacancies rose 54%, Kidder Mathews stated in its report.

Sublease vacancies appear to have chilled the office market in the South Bay, although this dynamic likely extends to both the Oakland metro market and to San Francisco.

“The rise in sublease space and remote work measures are applying downward pressure to overall asking rates,” Kidder Mathews reported, regarding the South Bay office market.

During the one-year period that ended in March, office vacancies have risen by 18.2% in the South Bay and by 16.2% in the Oakland-Berkeley-Alameda-Emeryville areas. But over the same period, office vacancies soared 93.1% in San Francisco, according to a report by Kidder Mathews.

04bd2 sjm downtownsj 0111 311 Real estate: Silicon Valley, East Bay office markets fare better than San Francisco
Downtown San Jose skyline. // Karl Mondon/Bay Area News Group

The typical office vacancy rate is 11.4% in the South Bay, 9% in the Oakland-Berkeley-Alameda-Emeryville area, and 11.2% in San Francisco, Kidder Mathews reported.

Average asking office rent rates are flabby at best in all three markets.

During the one-year period ending in March, office rents rose 3.6% in Oakland-Berkeley-Alameda-Emeryville — but they fell 14.8% in the San Francisco Financial District and by 3.7% in the South Bay, according to Kidder Mathews.

Various reports indicate that a recovery is underway in all three of these major office markets — but the road ahead remains murky.

That uncertainty was sketched out by Kidder Mathews in its report regarding the South Bay market.

“Asking lease rates are expected to remain steady,” Kidder Mathews stated. “Tenants are sticking with short-term leases as companies weigh having workers continue to work from home while planning a return to normalcy” post-COVID.

f97c2 SJM L BAYOFFICE x 01 1 Real estate: Silicon Valley, East Bay office markets fare better than San Francisco
San Francisco skyline and the Bay Bridge, view from Salesforce Tower, November 2019. // Karl Mondon / Bay Area News Group

 


Article source: https://www.mercurynews.com/2021/05/12/real-estate-silicon-valley-east-bay-office-san-francisco-covid-tech

Posted in SF Bay Area News | Tagged | Leave a comment

What’s it like to live in the hottest real estate neighborhood in the Bay Area

“It was like something out of a movie, you know. We were dressed in the all-white suits with the full face masks,” he said.

Ramos, 29, has spent the last 10 years on 25th Avenue in a duplex owned by his family. Over that decade, the real-estate firm Zillow estimates that Oakland’s median home value ballooned from under $380,000 in 2011 to over $890,000 — a trend that the coronavirus pandemic accelerated. Now his neighborhood is the hottest real estate market in the nine-county Bay Area region, the epicenter of a pandemic-era housing price boom in the East Bay.

Since the start of the pandemic, Reservoir Hill’s median home value has shot up by nearly 25%, from over $643,000 to about $800,000, per Zillow’s estimates. The neighborhood, which sits just south of the MacArthur Freeway and west of Fruitvale Avenue, is one of 14 in Oakland where estimated home prices increased by 15% or more in a single year. Most of these neighborhoods are in the eastern flatlands, from Reservoir Hill to Durant Manor.

“The data definitely shows a lot of these Oakland neighborhoods (are) among the fastest appreciating,” Jeff Tucker, a senior economist at Zillow, told The Chronicle.

But the trend extends far beyond Oakland. The housing market exploded nationwide in 2020: Home prices rose by 12%, the largest annual gain in 15 years, according to the SP Case Schiller Price Index. Tucker said the pandemic accelerated the home-buying process for many Americans by highlighting the importance of personal space, while de-emphasizing proximity to workplaces and city centers.

According to Tucker, Zillow generates a median home value estimate for a given neighborhood based on several factors, including the neighborhood’s location and its recent sales. Reservoir Hill had only five sales from March 2020 to March 2021, but those homes sold for much higher than Zillow would have expected — which is partly why its home values soared so much in the past year.

As for location, Tucker said many East Oakland neighborhoods appear to be in a “sweet spot” for young, upwardly mobile families.

“These neighborhoods in Oakland provide single-family homes at an affordable price point with some of the urban lifestyle amenities that people still like,” he said.

The surge in home values may benefit East Oakland homeowners looking to sell, but it’s also creating what Policy Link is calling a “displacement crisis” for struggling owners and renters. Even in early 2015, when Oakland’s median home value was a mere $520,000, most of the city’s residents could not afford to purchase a median-priced home in their own neighborhoods, according to Policy Link, a national research institute based in Oakland.

And even when they can afford it, families of color in East Oakland might not be able to get their offers accepted in a red-hot housing market like this one, according to Tucker.

“There’s a major downside here,” he said. “When there’s this super-elevated competition for homes, and people shopping from all over the Bay Area, it’s just harder to keep up if you’re not coming to the table with high income and sterling credit, where you can get preapproved for a mortgage and move quickly on closing. Or … where people are making cash offers. All this effectively locks out people who, in many cases, could afford homes.”

Soaring home prices have contributed to an exodus of people of color: Black people made up 44% of Oakland’s population in 1990, and now they make up less than 25%. In the census tract encompassing Reservoir Hill, the percentage of Black residents declined from 38% to 21% of the population from 2000 to 2019, while non-Hispanic white residents increased from 22% to 31%. (Hispanic populations rose and Asian populations declined, though both at more modest rates.)

Many Black and Latino ex-Bay Area residents have migrated to more affordable cities inland like Sacramento, according to a 2018 analysis by the UC Berkeley Terner Center. Ramos said many of his friends have moved to Stockton.

Chris Schildt, a senior policy expert at Policy Link, pointed out that the 2008 mortgage crisis hit East Oakland homeowners especially hard. Predatory lenders steered many Black and Latino homeowners into bad loans, forcing them into foreclosure when the recession hit.

“During the foreclosure crisis, so many private companies bought up homes in East Oakland, so they’re the ones profiting from this increase in home values right now,” she said.

These home value increases will likely make it harder for East Oaklanders renting from property management companies to stick around.

“Generally speaking, if the neighborhood home value rises, that’s a signal it’s becoming more desirable to people with higher incomes,” Schildt said. “A signal that rents will rise as well.”

Reservoir Hill feels a world away from these concerns — at least at first glance, and depending on whom you ask. The neighborhood is racially integrated, and is home to working people in education, engineering and the arts. Many residents have owned their homes for decades.

Lauren Beilin is one of the exceptions: She moved into her home on Sheffield Avenue soon before the pandemic hit. She was attracted to the two-bedroom house for two main reasons: It was what she could afford in Oakland, and it lay within the school map boundaries for Glenview Elementary, a public school she thought would be a good fit for her two young children. (25th Avenue lies just outside those boundaries.)

When told she lived in the hottest housing market in the Bay Area, Beilin was surprised.

“I mean, I know we’re in the Bay Area, but we’re below 580,” she said. Even though her home has likely appreciated since she bought it, Beilin said she wouldn’t consider selling anytime soon. “It’s the best neighborhood I’ve ever lived in,” she said.

Aside from Beilin and a few other young families, Sheffield Avenue has had a low turnover rate in the past few years — partly because the community is so tight-knit. But a few homes near Ramos’ street did have impressive sales in 2020, according to Zillow, which could have driven up home values for the rest of the neighborhood.

Ramos said those higher prices have brought wealthier, whiter neighbors to his street, and to other parts of the city. “Lots of people are coming from San Francisco,” he said. “Especially where I’m at, people have moved away. Mostly people of color.” He has mixed feelings about gentrification in Oakland overall: “Maybe the crime’s gone down,” he said. “But then it’s also sad, you know, seeing people that lived here for lots of years being pushed out of their homes. … When it was 2010, you could (rent) a place in Lake Merritt for $800 and now it’s like, $2,000 and up.”

Ramos still appreciates his street’s community feel. “I love my neighbors, and we look out for each other, exchange phone numbers,” he said. He’s close with his aunt and her daughters, who occupy the other half of his duplex. Ramos spent a recent evening walking down 25th Avenue knocking on doors, asking neighbors to sign a petition to add speed bumps to the street.

Still, that sense of closeness with the broader community has faded a bit. “When I first moved in over here, we used to have block parties, and we were involved with the neighborhood crime watch,” he said. But over time, he added, “people who were the leaders moved out here. They got older, passed away.”

Susie Neilson is a San Francisco Chronicle staff writer. Email: susie.neilson@sfchronicle.com Twitter: @susieneilson

Article source: https://www.sfchronicle.com/realestate/article/What-s-it-like-to-live-in-the-hottest-real-16155429.php

Posted in SF Bay Area News | Tagged | Leave a comment