When San Francisco Supervisor Scott Wiener went before the Planning Commission in November proposing to attach a deadline to some California Environmental Quality Act appeals, he was met by 90 minutes of strong opposition from public commenters and commissioners, who told him to come back with a better plan done with more public outreach.

Thirty-four amendments later, Wiener will be back at the commission Thursday hoping to change an appeals process that he calls unpredictable and chaotic.

“If you’re not a land-use lawyer, it’s completely opaque. It’s unclear even when the deadline is to file the appeal,” Wiener said.

San Francisco is one of few cities where smaller projects that don’t require environmental impact reports aren’t subject to a set deadline for appeals to the Board of Supervisors. Wiener wants to establish a deadline so that any appeal of the state environmental quality act would be made within 30 days of a project’s approval.

Currently the city attorney determines on a case-by-case basis whether an appeal is timely.

“The bottom line is we’re not taking away anyone’s right to appeal the CEQA decision,” said Planning Director John Rahaim, who supports Wiener’s efforts. “What this does is establish some very basic rules around deadline appeals.”

Simplifying process

Gabriel Metcalf, the executive director of San Francisco Planning and Urban Research Association, said that the city’s planning code is thousands of pages long and that Wiener’s legislation would simplify things without resulting in material changes for bigger projects.

“We have a system that is designed for maximum confusion and maximum frustration,” he said. “The amendments we’re talking about here would help clear up a little bit of the confusion and a little bit of the frustration for a small set of projects.”

Wiener stresses that his legislation is focused on smaller projects that can least afford to have an unpredictable environmental process, as opposed to large developers who can afford to wage long, costly legal battles.

“This isn’t about the Parkmerceds, the Treasure Islands and America’s Cups of the world,” he said. “This is the much larger category ranging from small park projects, to pedestrian projects, to people doing work on their homes.”

But some groups wary of development say they do believe the legislation puts unreasonable constraints on the appeals process.

“Scott Wiener’s legislation puts forward a time frame that will hamper our ability to effectively file an appeal,” said Michelle Myers, the director of the Sierra Club’s San Francisco Bay chapter.

Eric Brooks, an organizer for the Our City activist group that opposed past efforts by supervisors to streamline the CEQA process, said he also shares Myers’ concern about a provision in Wiener’s legislation that would allow some appeals to be heard before a board committee instead of the full Board of Supervisors.

“Basically what the legislation is doing is taking some small problems in the current law that do need some fixing and using them as a vehicle to completely gut the public’s ability to use CEQA to support San Francisco and its neighborhoods from bad real estate developments,” Brooks said.

Miss appeal window

He also worried that project opponents would miss the appeal window if the legislation is approved.

Brooks and Myers said they are working with Supervisor Jane Kim on alternative CEQA legislation that would involve the full board in appeals and push back the appeal deadlines, which Wiener said would make the process worse than it already is.

Other neighborhood leaders say they welcome clear rules for appeals on smaller projects. Raymond Holland, president of the Planning Association for the Richmond recalled that when ATT started adding utility boxes on sidewalks in his neighborhoods a few years ago, there was a debate over whether it was too late to appeal.

“It was real unclear when the decision of the exemption was made and secondly when the clock started to run,” he said. “It’s been sort of a free-for-all whenever you have an appeal, so I think codifying makes sense.”

Once the Planning Commission makes its recommendation Thursday, there will be several more public hearings before the legislation is voted on by the Board of Supervisors.

Neal J. Riley is a San Francisco Chronicle staff writer. E-mail: nriley@sfchronicle.com Twitter: @realdealneal

Article source: http://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/Supervisor-s-2nd-try-to-change-environmental-4352827.php

The average monthly price of an apartment lease has risen to $2,734 — up 12.9 percent since 2011 — according to data compiled by the rental data firm Real Facts. The spike in San Francisco rents seems to be spilling over to cheaper markets like Oakland, where the average rent is now $1,835 — up 14.4 percent since last year. Pacifica, where rents now average $1,908, has experienced a 15.6 percent increase.

“Outlying areas are starting to benefit from the improvement of Silicon Valley and San Francisco,” said Nick Grotjahn of Real Facts. “But you can still go right across the Bay and to Oakland and pay almost $1,000 less per month.”

At a forum Tuesday sponsored by the San Francisco Planning and Urban Research Association think tank, housing developers were asked whether The City is experiencing a “rent bubble.” Their answers didn’t break down along clear yes-or-no lines.

“Not quite yet,” said Meg Spriggs, a senior development director with the developer AvalonBay, which is seeking to put more than 250 new apartments on Ninth Street near the new Twitter headquarters. “But I think we’ll start to see rents taper a bit. Sixteen percent growth is not sustainable, but I think there’s still room for growth.”

Rental prices have surged following a new influx of young, high-earning workers who don’t necessarily want to be tied down to one place, but who also haven’t yet amassed enough money to make a down payment for San Francisco’s average home price of $725,000.

A recent survey by Realtor.com shows that The City’s median listing price is up 15.4 percent since last year, which matches a similar upward tick in Oakland, where the average home is selling for $379,000. The number of homes for sale in San Francisco is down 40 percent since last year, and nearly 60 percent in Oakland.

And where apartment owners in the mid-2000s fought to convert their units to condominiums so they could be sold, the popular move in today’s market is to build what could be considered condos and instead rent them as apartments.

“It’s the reverse trend now,” Grotjahn said.

Even with rising rents, the disparity between who can only afford to rent and who can buy in San Francisco remains large, said Kevin Kearney, a Coldwell Banker real estate agent who works throughout the Bay Area. He said even though high-earning young tech workers might not be able to afford homes just yet, in some cases their parents can.

“With the rising rents, we’re definitely seeing some people get off the fence,” Kearney said. “But still, a lot more people can afford to pay rent on a monthly basis — even if it’s higher than a mortgage payment — than those who can come up with a down payment. So we’re seeing more and more of those down payments from parents.”

dschreiber@sfexaminer.com

Median home price increases in Bay Area

• San Francisco: Up 15.4 percent to $725,000 since last year
• Oakland: Up 14.8 percent to $379,000 since last year
• San Jose: Up 12 percent to $549,000 since last year

Source: Realtor.com

Monthly apartment rent increases in Bay Area

Article source: http://www.sfexaminer.com/local/2012/07/san-francisco-housing-market-booms-bigger-ever

Austin Allison grinned.

“This looks great; it’s a hip, high-tech vibe,” he said, snapping photos with his iPhone. “It’s open, collaborative space.”

Allison, 26, was seeking a San Francisco base for DotLoop, the technology company he founded in his hometown of Cincinnati three years ago.

He and his wife, Angela Allison, 28, who runs a decorative painting company, plan to relocate to the city this month with their Yorkshire terrier, Paris.

The couple’s move and their quest for living and work space epitomize a modern-day migration being played out continually in the city. San Francisco’s pull as a high-tech hub and cachet as a place to live is drawing growing numbers of entrepreneurs and technology workers who move here from as nearby as Mountain View or as far away as India.

“The Bay Area has one of the most educated and creative workforces anywhere on the planet,” said Gabriel Metcalf, president of the San Francisco Planning and Urban Research Association. “For companies trying to be innovative, the Bay Area is one of the best locations there is. This sets up a ‘virtuous cycle’: The more companies that locate here, the more talent wants to be here, which then improves the attractiveness to more companies.”

Since early 2010, San Francisco’s number of tech sector workers has grown by 13,000, hitting 44,000, according to an analysis of state Employment Development Department data, said Colin Yasukochi, director of research and analysis at CNRE, a commercial real estate firm.

Growing tech hub

In the same time frame, 150 tech firms have set up shop in the city, bringing the total number of such enterprises to 1,850.

Meanwhile, 18 firms from outside the city are seeking office space here.

“We’re seeing the office market explode with an influx of tech companies,” said Donnette Clarens of Cornish Carey Commercial Newmark Knight Frank, DotLoop’s broker.

The Allisons – high school sweethearts – did an initial foray in May, seeking a base for DotLoop and an apartment for themselves, and lost out on some places by not pouncing quickly enough. They returned for two whirlwind days of hunting in late June.

Austin Allison dropped out of his second year of law school in 2009 to found DotLoop, which automates paperwork for real estate agents. Launched with angel capital, the company became profitable in 17 months, he said. In May, to accelerate growth, it took $7 million in funding from Trinity Ventures.

San Francisco is the clear place for that expansion to happen, he said.

“San Francisco has a talent pool that is different and more robust than the talent pool that exists in the Midwest,” he said. “Our office here will become our bleeding-edge tech arm, but our internal operations will stay in Cincinnati.”

He wants to hire 10 to 20 people in San Francisco within the next year. Having an office that projects the right vibe – “fun, cool, energetic, with lots of natural light, high ceilings and an open floor plan” and near amenities and transit – is a key part of recruitment, he said. Another big consideration is flexibility: a space that can grow with the company, or a shorter lease period in case it needs to relocate.

Then there’s price. “We want to be scrappy and prudent, but we don’t want to scrimp by holing up in a cave,” he said.

Average rents

DotLoop wanted to pay in the mid-$40s per square foot per year. That’s on target with the city’s first-quarter average rent of $46.66 a square foot, as tracked by Jones Lang LaSalle, which notes that rates are up 39 percent from the market bottom in 2010. The firm needs about 2,000 square feet to start.

Austin Allison has a strong preference to be in SoMa, near other up-and-coming tech firms. SoMa’s vacancy rate is 3.8 percent, Jones Lang LaSalle said; it hasn’t been that low since the height of the dot-com boom in 2000.

While incubator spaces offer flexibility, he feels DotLoop is past the startup phase of working cheek by jowl with other nascent companies, just as people outgrow group houses after college.

“We are a real company with products, revenue and customers, not a three-person startup with an idea,” he said. “Our space should reflect that.”

Like other tech folks, he eschews the type of traditional offices inhabited by lawyers and accountants.

That’s spurred an odd trend downtown: Landlords rip out walls and ceilings so Class A offices will look more like old warehouses.

“They are exposing natural brick that’s been sheet-rocked up for years, opening up the ceilings, trying to maximize window lines to get great light,” Clarens said. “It’s all about making it more attractive to creative-user tenants.”

Austin Allison made offers on two offices: A space one floor above the open-floor-plan Second Street office and a cheaper sublet. After two weeks of negotiations, DotLoop signed for the Second Street space, agreeing to a two-year lease on 1,900 square feet in the low $40s. A big plus was a contiguous office that will be available in a year, offering room to grow.

Housing budget

On the housing front, the Allisons were in the lucky position of having a $4,000-a-month budget. At that price range, they didn’t have to deal with cattle-call open houses where dozens of hopefuls jostle for favor with a rental agent.

Still, it was competitive. In May, they were surprised when apartments they toured got snapped up within hours.

The couple’s apartment wish list mirrored that for DotLoop’s office space.

“We’re steeped in that world of lofts with high ceilings and an industrial feel,” Angela said. “Most San Francisco places are older in style; SoMa and South Beach are the only areas with robust modern architecture.”

They decided to boost their monthly budget to $6,000, because a second bedroom to host DotLoop’s Cincinnati employees was a must.

They looked at condos being sublet and apartments for rent in several high-end high-rises: The Infinity near the Ferry Building, the Paramount and the Metropolitan in SoMa.

Sticker shock

A converted loft in a smaller building in Mint Plaza appealed to both for its industrial aesthetic – but it had just one bedroom. At the Brannan in South Park, a stunning view of the bay and ATT Park was a draw, but the $6,000-a-month condo’s biggest pluses were that it came fully furnished in a sleek, modern style; had two bed/bath suites separated by the living/dining room; and was near Highway 101 for quick access to SFO.

They decided to go for it and signed a one-year lease.

Not surprisingly, the couple had some sticker shock.

“Our Cincinnati condo is about $350,000; it easily would be $1.5 million out here,” Austin said. “Our Cincinnati office is less than $10 a square foot. It’s extremely competitive out here; the landlord has more leverage to dictate how the game is played.”

Carolyn Said is a San Francisco Chronicle staff writer. E-mail: csaid@sfchronicle.com

Article source: http://www.sfgate.com/realestate/article/Tech-firms-seeks-perfect-space-in-S-F-3691082.php