advertisement

U.S. home prices jumped 10.9 percent in March compared with a year ago, the most since April 2006.

A growing number of buyers are bidding on a tight supply of homes, driving prices higher and helping the housing market recover. The Standard Poor’s/Case-Shiller home price index released Tuesday also showed that all 20 cities measured by the report posted year-over-year gains for the third straight month. And prices rose in 15 cities in March from February. That’s up from only 11 in the previous month.

The monthly figures aren’t seasonally adjusted and may reflect the beginning of the spring buying season.

Prices rose in Phoenix by 22.5 percent over the past 12 months, the biggest gain among cities. It was followed by San Francisco (22.2 percent) and Las Vegas (20.6 percent). New York City had the smallest year-over-year increase at 2.6 percent, followed by Cleveland at 4.8 percent.

“Rising home prices may begin to alleviate a lack of housing inventory … by encouraging more homeowners to put their properties on the market,” said Maninder Sibia, an economist with Economic Advisory Service, in a note to clients.

“The housing market is clearly improving.” The index covers roughly half of U.S. homes. It measures prices compared with those in January 2000 and creates a three-month moving average. The March figures are the latest available.

The U.S. housing market is steadily recovering, buoyed by solid job gains and near-record low mortgage rates.

Sales of new homes rose in April to nearly a five-year high. And sales of previously occupied homes ticked up in April to the highest level in three and a half years. Despite the gains, a limited number of homeowners are putting their houses on the market. That’s helped lift home prices. And it’s made builders more willing to ramp up construction. Applications for building permits rose in April to the highest level in nearly five years.

The supply of available homes jumped in April, but was still 14 percent below its level a year earlier. Stan Humphries, chief economist at Zillow, a real estate data provider, said that the increase in the Case-Shiller index has been skewed higher by cities such as Phoenix and San Francisco.

Fewer homes are available in those areas because many homeowners still owe more on their mortgages than their homes are worth.

That makes it difficult to sell. Still, even excluding those markets, home prices are rising steadily nationwide, Humphries said. The increases are “certainly confirmation that the housing market is experiencing a brisk recovery,” he added.

The housing recovery is creating more construction jobs and bolstering the economy in other ways. Higher home prices make homeowners feel wealthier and encourages them to spend more.

Rising prices also encourage more would-be buyers to purchase homes, before prices rise further.

They also enable more homeowners to sell homes, by reducing the number of people who owe more on their mortgages than the homes are worth. Prices have been increasing steadily since last summer.

Still, they are about 29 percent below the peak reached in July 2006. Banks have raised their credit standards since the housing bubble burst and are demanding larger down payments. That’s made it particularly hard for potential first-time buyers to get a mortgage.

Copyright Associated Press

Article source: http://www.nbcbayarea.com/news/local/Bay-Area-Housing-Prices-Take-Big-Jump-209268641.html

Overall, U.S. home prices registered their biggest annual climb since summer 2006, rising 8.1 percent compared with last year, according to the SP/Case-Shiller composite index. Every one of the 20 major metropolitan areas Case-Shiller tracks posted year-over-year gains. The annual gains accelerated in 19 of the markets, with Detroit the only exception.

“The number that jumps off the page is San Francisco’s 17.5 percent increase in the past 12 months,” David Blitzer, chairman of the index committee for SP Dow Jones Indices, said. “That’s pretty big. Only one city, Phoenix (with a 23.2 percent increase), did better. Compared to the low points, you’re way up there, about 25 percent over the low. It’s a strong comeback.”

Resale homes

Case-Shiller defines the San Francisco metro area as Alameda, Contra Costa, Marin, San Francisco and San Mateo counties. The index tracks sales of the same single-family houses over time, comparing changes with a base value of 100, which represents values as of January 2000.

The San Francisco index is now 147.45, meaning that prices are 47.45 percent above their January 2000 level. The region’s index peaked at 218.37 in May 2006 and hit a low of 117.74 in March 2009 – so prices are still 32.5 percent below their peak, according to the index.

Several forces propel the upward trend, notably an improving economy, low interest rates, tight inventory and fewer foreclosures.

The San Francisco area “is the second-leading place in the country in job creation (after Houston), and doesn’t build a lot of houses, so supply is very tight,” said Ken Rosen, chairman of the Fisher Center for Real Estate and Urban Economics at UC Berkeley. “We added 210,000 jobs to the Bay Area in the past 2 1/2 years – that’s a lot of people.”

Similar forces are driving the rental market, which is also experiencing big price run-ups. Exacerbating that situation, the tight for-sale inventory “is forcing a lot of people who want to be buyers to remain as renters,” Rosen said.

Rosen and others said Case-Shiller actually understates the turnaround – prices have risen even more than the index can capture. In part, that’s because it has a long lag time, measuring prices in January. Real estate service DataQuick, for instance, reported that February median sales prices in the nine-county Bay Area were up 24.6 percent compared with the same time in 2012.

“I would say Case-Shiller under-represents,” said Charmaine Frank, Redfin real estate’s area manager for San Francisco, San Mateo, Santa Clara and Marin counties. “The market has taken a pretty dramatic turn since January.”

Cash is the fuel

Like agents throughout the Bay Area, she said there are “enormous bidding wars going on. We see upwards of 40 to 60 offers on some properties; typically the top five to eight will be all-cash buyers.”

The numerous cash sales help fuel price appreciation, she said, because buyers skip getting an appraisal since they don’t have a mortgage. Appraisals, which rely on recent comparable sales, would moderate the rapid run-up.

“There’s a huge shortage of homes on the market right now,” said Cindi Hagley, a broker with the Hagley Group at Prudential California Realty in San Ramon. “For example, there are only 12 single-family homes for sale in Dublin right now. Ordinarily there should be 100 to 150 homes for sale there.”

Patrick Newport, U.S. economist with market analyst Global Insight, said that the rising home prices should help boost the economy further. “They stimulate new construction, and they also help consumer spending because they raise the value of people’s homes,” he said.

With multiple bids and properties selling well above asking price, could another real estate bubble be forming?

“Not yet,” said Rosen. “If they keep (interest) rates this low for two more years, the answer is yes.”

“This time, rapidly rising prices are a good thing,” Newport said. “A lot of homeowners are underwater; this helps them come out of that.”

Carolyn Said is a San Francisco Chronicle staff writer. E-mail: csaid@sfchronicle.com Twitter: @csaid

Article source: http://www.sfgate.com/business/article/Home-prices-in-Bay-Area-up-17-5-in-January-4386974.php

Mansions that had languished on San Francisco’s Billionaire’s Row were finally snapped up last year. Well-known moguls from tech and finance poured money into real estate. Expansive estates in Silicon Valley drew publicity-shy billionaires who set up shell companies to shroud their identities.

In the nine-county Bay Area, 11,041 properties changed hands in 2012 with sales prices above $1 million, up 29 percent from 2011, according to real estate service DataQuick of San Diego.

Of course, around here, a million dollars doesn’t necessarily buy a mansion. That price tag can easily adorn a two-bedroom condo in San Francisco, a run-down ranch in Palo Alto, or a suburban tract house in Moraga.

“Virtually all home sales in some communities were in the $1 million-plus category,” DataQuick said, listing Ross, Los Altos, Atherton and Hillsborough as Bay Area towns where that was the case. Hillsborough had 422 million-dollar-plus sales in 2012.

Overseas cash

The real action was at the even higher end – 162 Bay Area homes sold for north of $5 million, DataQuick said. California notched an all-time high of 697 homes selling for over $5 million.

“In the prestige market (some sales) may have to do with where to park assets relative to other areas like the stock market and mutual funds,” said DataQuick analyst John Karevoll.

“One clear portion of the market that’s very active is buyers from abroad,” he said. “They’re coming here, they’ve got money and that money is in cash.”

The recovering economy, especially the tech sector, definitely has played a role in the luxury boom.

“The technology industry has done very well recently, which has created a wealthier pool of buyers,” said Jed Kolko, chief economist with real-estate site Trulia.com. “At the same time, with prices rising, there are more million-dollar homes than a year ago simply because of appreciation.”

Inventory of high-end homes is just as tight as at other price points.

Malin Giddings, a Coldwell Banker agent who focuses on luxury real estate, said: “2012 was an incredible year because there was very low inventory and very high demand.”

Just as with the regular market, high-end homes sold for less than their bubble-fueled heights. “For sellers who understand that values have taken a 25 percent hit, those properties are moving,” she said. “We are not back to pre-2008 prices.”

Who’s buying

Another impetus for sellers: A Jan. 1 hike in the capital gains tax.

“In Palo Alto there were quite a few sales of homes over $3 million by people whose cost basis was $50,000 to $200,000, who were motivated to close before the end of the year because of the tax bump,” said Steve Niethammer, a Realtor with Zane MacGregor Co.

Who buys trophy homes?

David Bellings of Coldwell Banker, who specializes in luxury properties, said his current listing for an $18.5 million, seven-bedroom home in Sea Cliff, as well as other high-end homes he sold last year, drew interest from “CEOs from around the world” as well as “celebrity types from L.A. thinking of moving here to escape the crazy paparazzi and to have more of a normal life.”

Several well-known tech moguls went on shopping sprees in San Francisco. Yammer founder David Sacks bought 2845 Broadway for $20 million, a fraction of the $65 million it once commanded. Jack Dorsey of Twitter and Square paid $9.9 million for a two-bedroom in Sea Cliff. Zynga’s Mark Pincus paid $16 million for the Newhall mansion on Pacific Avenue. Apple’s Jonathan Ive, the mastermind behind the design of the iPod and iPhone, paid $17 million for 2808 Broadway.

“Many of those properties had been on the market for over three years, especially on Billionaire’s Row,” said Sally Kuchar, San Francisco editor of the real-estate website Curbed.com. “The influx of tech money has really helped those big estates sell.”

Tech money reportedly fueled the blockbuster sale of a 9-acre hilltop estate in Woodside that sold in November for $117.5 million, setting an all-time U.S. record. Although public records don’t show who ponied up that amount, the Los Angeles Times said the new owner may be Softbank CEO Masayoshi Son, the second-richest man in Japan.

The seller is no secret: It was Tully Friedman, CEO of San Francisco private equity firm Friedman, Fleischer and Lowe.

Record-setting sums

“That sale just blows my mind,” Niethammer said. “It looks like (the buyer) overpaid by $100 million. Property in Woodside generally goes for about a million bucks an acre; with the house, it should have been about a $20 million deal.”

The previous record-setting sale quickly ended up losing half its value, at least for tax purposes. Russian billionaire Yuri Milner, an early Facebook investor, paid $100 million in 2011 for a Los Altos Hills mansion, but a year later got the county to chop its assessed value to $50 million.

Niethammer is listing a 150-acre former llama ranch estate for $15.5 million in Bonny Doon, overlooking the Pacific Ocean. “I told the seller, ‘You might want to add $100 million to it so it will sell,’ ” he joked.

The historic Flood estate in Woodside, 92 oak-studded acres listed for $85 million in September, has drawn a lot of interest, said Mary Gullixson of Alain Pinel Realtors.

Showing just how coveted open space is, she’s listing a 3-acre parcel – no house – in the Menlo Circus Club area of Atherton for $19.8 million. “It’s a diamond in the rough,” she said.

Another mega-estate in Silicon Valley just hit the market for a cool $100 million with an unusual caveat – the buyer must agree to let the current owner live out his days there.

Located in Hillsborough, the 47.4-acre estate features hiking trails, streams, wildlife and gardens designed by Thomas Church. It comes with a 16,000-square-foot Mediterranean-style home designed by the same firm that designed the St. Francis Hotel. The house has a ballroom, pavilion, library and swimming pool, according to court records of the owner’s divorce.

Lifetime resident

The house’s inhabitant – Christian de Guigne IV, 75, the current owner – plans to remain in residence there for the rest of his life.

Isn’t that a rare request? “It’s as unusual as the size of the land that’s available in such an exclusive area,” said listing agent Gregg Lynn of Sotheby’s International Realty.

The de Guigne family – the patriarch emigrated from France and co-founded Stauffer Chemical Co. in Gold Rush-era San Francisco – has owned the land for 150 years. The house construction started in 1914 and was delayed when Christian de Guigne II went off to serve in World War I, Lynn said.

Million-dollar-plus home sales surge

The number of homes selling for more than $1 million was up 29 percent in the Bay Area in 2012.

Source: DataQuick

Carolyn Said is a San Francisco Chronicle staff writer. E-mail: csaid@sfchronicle.com

Article source: http://www.sfgate.com/realestate/article/Bay-Area-luxury-home-sales-boom-in-2012-4244363.php

Refinances are surging this year, not just because interest rates are hitting new record lows but because the government is making severely underwater loans eligible for refinance. (Read More: Is Housing Recovering as Much as Everyone Thinks?)

The Home Affordable Refinance Program, which involves loans backed by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, used to cap negative equity, but this year that cap was removed, putting thousands more loans into the refi machine. So far more than half a million loans were refinanced through HARP since the beginning of this year.

Politicians and housing advocates claim that all the savings from these record low interest rates and the ensuing refinances is going back into the economy, but that does not appear to be the case. (Read More: Fed Pulls Trigger, to Buy Mortgages in Effort to Lower Rates)

Given the research from Freddie Mac, a quick, non-scientific survey of small lenders and brokers, produced similar findings:

Craig Strent/Apex Home Loans, Maryland: Homeowners, particularly older ones that have already met their financial planning goals, are taking the savings and just putting it back in the loan, meaning they are lowering their rates, but continuing to pay the same amount on the new loan that they were paying on the previous loan. This accelerates their payoff and decreases the interest they pay, though arguably with an opportunity cost given how cheap the money is.

Dan Green/Waterstone Mortgage, Ohio: Not all households are choosing to reduce payments. Many are choosing to reduce term. At today’s rates, the first payment of a 15-year mortgage is comprised of 67 percent principal. To get that point on a 30-year mortgage would take 18 years. More homeowners are asking about amortization schedules, and the benefits of paying extra principal each month. There’s more talk of saving than spending.

Julian Hebron/RPM Mortgage, California: Refi to lower payment, but keep making previous payment to pay loan down faster. Example: If you use our average loan of $550,000 and super-conforming rates of 3.5 percent now vs. 4.5 percent a year ago, a borrower’s payment drops from $2,787 to $2,429 (this factors in the paydown of $550,000 to $541,000 over 12 months). If a borrower keeps making old payment on new loan, thereby paying loan down by an extra $358 per month, they cut 6 years (or 20 percent) off a 30-year term.

(Read More: Is Housing Risen From Ashes?)

Suffice it to say, when it comes to home equity, we have fast become the anti-ATM society, by will or by force (we don’t have a whole lot of home equity anymore).

After trillions of dollars in lost home equity, Americans now appear to want it back so badly that they’re willing to pay it in themselves. They also want less debt for a shorter period of time.

This sounds like responsible, conservative fiscal planning, but it also means that savings from rock-bottom interest rates do not get paid back into the economy the way so many politicians and analysts have suggested.

-By CNBC’s Diana Olick
@Diana_Olick

Questions? Comments?