(Read more: Mortgage alert: Borrowers change how they cheat)

“It is estimated that the improvement in recovery rates alone is worth more than $5 billion to the MMIF—which would far exceed the amount of the mandatory appropriation,” wrote Galante.

The FHA, which insures low down-payment loans, or loans with a minimum 3.5 percent down, stepped in to save the housing market. It went from about a 3 percent share of the market to almost a third of the mortgage market during the crash. But now, it’s paying the price.

“Over the years, the FHA has strayed far from its original mission. It has become the nation’s largest subprime lender,” wrote Rep. Jeb Hensarling, R-Texas, chairman of the House Financial Services Committee.

(Read more: Map: Tracking the recovery)

Most of the FHA losses, around $70 billion, were from loans originated between 2007 and 2009. The biggest trouble has been in reverse-mortgages for senior citizens and seller-funded down payments; the latter was banned in 2008.

—By CNBC’s Diana Olick. Follow her on Twitter @Diana_Olick.

Questions?Comments? facebook.com/DianaOlickCNBC

Article source: http://www.cnbc.com/id/101068629

“I think you’ve got to move away from a situation where when private shareholder gain and government taxpayer losses, and that is what this bill seeks to do, it really transforms how we doing housing finance hopefully we will be able to pass something that puts us on a better course than where we are,” said Sen. Corker in an interview Tuesday on CNBC.

(Read More: Big Banks Bet on Jumbo Mortgages Again)

Some analysts say the lawsuit could actually push Congress to act more quickly on winding down Fannie and Freddie.

“What we just a few days ago saw as only a remote possibility is now a 25 percent chance for action,” wrote Jaret Seiberg of Guggenheim Partners in a note to investors. “This is because we suspect this will anger many on Capitol Hill who believe Fannie and Freddie are only alive and kicking because taxpayers put $187 billion at risk. We see the suit reinforcing the view on Capitol Hill that Fannie and Freddie included too much upside for investors and too much risk for taxpayers.”

(Read More: Reverse Mortgages Backfiring on Seniors)

—By CNBC’s Diana Olick; Follow her on Twitter @Diana_Olick or on Facebook at facebook.com/DianaOlickCNBC

Questions? Comments? RealtyCheck@cnbc.com

Article source: http://www.cnbc.com/id/100806300

The $510,000 median for the nine-county Bay Area represents a jump of 30.8 percent from a year ago and a record 17 percent above March’s median price, said DataQuick, a San Diego real estate service that produced the report.

“The Bay Area is getting back to normal fast,” said Andrew LePage, a DataQuick analyst. “We’ve had just the right ingredients for big increases in the median and other price measures. We’ve got drum-tight inventory of homes for sale, an unprecedented level of investors chasing homes, interest rates lower than most of us alive have ever seen, and changes in the types of homes selling and where they’re selling.”

The median represents a midpoint, meaning half of Bay Area homes sold for more than $510,000 and half sold for less. It is influenced both by actual appreciation in home values and by a changing mix of homes sold.

The Bay Area median peaked at $665,000 in summer 2007. During the real estate downturn, bargain-basement foreclosures and short sales helped drag the median down to a low of $375,000 in March 2009. Now, with far fewer distress sales and more high-end homes changing hands, a similar dynamic is buoying it. DataQuick said the median has regained 59 percent of its losses.

Carolyn Said is a San Francisco Chronicle staff writer. E-mail: Csaid@sfchronicle.com Twitter: @csaid

Article source: http://www.sfgate.com/business/article/Bay-Area-median-home-price-hits-510-000-4520145.php

(Read More: Housing Recovery Is Leaving Behind First-Time Buyers)

But even outside those hot markets, this national housing recovery is dependent on investors, who are largely all-cash buyers. The mortgage market is still too restrictive to support the kind of bulk-buying that needs to occur, and many potential buyers either lack the credit scores or the confidence to jump in. Another 14 million borrowers still owe more on their mortgages than their homes are worth, according to Zillow, and are therefore unable to move.

(Read More: Foreclosure Discounts Drying Up)

Five million properties are either in the foreclosure process or their owners are delinquent on their mortgages. That means foreclosures will remain elevated for the foreseeable future, and investors will be necessary to absorb them. Another concern is that home prices are rising faster than income, which could push potential owner-occupants away just as they were starting to dip their toes in again.

(Read More: Yes, Housing Starts Surge, but Rentals Are the Drivers)

The risk of sales dropping as investors leave is obviously higher in the markets that saw the biggest drop in home prices during the crash, again, like Phoenix. Other markets, such as Chicago, Atlanta, and even parts of Florida, where prices are still weak and distress is still a large share of the market, are still seeing improved sales, as investors shift their sights and cash to more yield-worthy ground.

Sector Watch – U.S. Home Builders

• Toll Brothers
  [TOL 
  Loading... 
   
   
  ()
   
  ]
• DR Horton
  [DHI 
  Loading... 
   
   
  ()
   
  ]
• Hovnanian Enterprises
  [HOV 
  Loading... 
   
   
  ()
   
  ]
• PulteGroup
  [PHM 
  Loading... 
   
   
  ()
   
  ]
• Ryland Group
  [RYL 
  Loading... 
   
   
  ()
   
  ]
• Lennar Corp
  [LEN 
  Loading... 
   
   
  ()
   
  ]
• Beazer Homes USA
  [BZH 
  Loading... 
   
   
  ()
   
  ]
• Meritage Homes
  [MTH 
  Loading... 
   
   
  ()
   
  ]
• KB Home
  [KBH 
  Loading... 
   
   
  ()
   
  ]

Questions?  Comments?