The following information is from BART:

Children soliciting funds or involved in any expressive activity under a BART permit must be accompanied by adults at all times and are only allowed to solicit donations after school hours and for limited hours on weekends. Other changes include the ratio of supervising adult to every minor and the proximity the adults must be to the children they are supervising.

Revised Language

BART’s new expressive permit language is as follows:

• Minors.  Within these Rules, “minor” is defined as an individual under 18 years of age, other than a legally emancipated minor.  Adult supervision is required at all times if an expressive activity involves the participation of minors.
• Adult supervision shall be maintained at a ratio of one (1) adult to every three (3) minors (for example, if there are one to three minors, at least one supervising adult is required; for four to six minors, at least two supervising adults are required).  The adult supervising the minors must be physically present and within five-ten feet of the minors at all times.
• Inadequate adult supervision of participating minors is a ground for revoking a permit and denying future permits. Solicitation by or Involving Minors.  In addition to the requirements expressed in Rule 6, minors are only permitted to solicit or be involved in solicitation between the hours of 4pm-7pm on weekdays and 9am-7pm on weekends.

For more information, please visit BART.gov.

Article source: http://blog.sfgate.com/incontracosta/2012/08/12/bay-area-rapid-transit-bart-revises-permit-rules-relating-to-minors/

That’s how much will be needed to help pay for a tunnel to connect the Transbay Terminal to the Caltrain station at Fourth and King streets.

As it turns out, none of the $2.5 billion in tunnel costs were included as part of the narrowly approved high-speed-rail deal.

It’s up to the locals to make the tunnel happen. If they don’t, the $68 billion high-speed-rail line from Los Angeles will dead-end several blocks from downtown proper.

Building the tunnel will put San Francisco in competition with those hoping to finish BART to San Jose – both projects will be tussling for $1.8 billion that the federal government will direct to the Bay Area in the coming years.

Just for work to start on the 1.2-mile dig through the heart of the city, however, the Bay Area has to come up with its own $650 million. The current plan is to raise $300 million from higher bridge tolls and $350 million in San Francisco sales-tax dollars.

“That’s a reasonable estimation,” said spokesman Randy Rentschler of the Metropolitan Transportation Commission.

José Luis Moscovich, executive director of the San Francisco County Transportation Authority, said city voters could be asked for the $350 million as part of an overall transportation-tax extension within the next two years.

The date for when the Legislature and voters would be asked to approve another $1 toll hike to raise the $300 million in tunnel money is a bit more elusive. Although acknowledging that toll money would be needed for a San Francisco tunnel, Rentschler says there are no plans on the boards to seek an increase.

Even if all the money does come through and the tunnel gets dug, High-Speed Rail Authority boss Dan Richard says, the bullet train won’t arrive in San Francisco until 2028 or so. Until then, the tunnel would be used only by Caltrain.

Oil and water: Even before they qualified their initiative for San Francisco’s November ballot last week, backers of the effort to restore Hetch Hetchy Valley in Yosemite National Park were turning up the campaign rhetoric.

According to a recent fundraising appeal, the century-old dam in the Sierra that supplies water for San Francisco, the Peninsula and elsewhere is an environmental disaster worse than the Deepwater Horizon oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico in 2010.

“Imagine the BP oil spill multiplied by 326: That’s how much water was deliberately flooded into Yosemite National Park,” Restore Hetch Hetchy executive Mike Marshall wrote in his appeal.

He added, “Your donation today sends a loud and clear message to San Francisco bureaucrats: When you’ve made a mess, you clean it up!”

“Pretty shameless,” shot back P.J. Johnston, spokesman for the pro-reservoir forces.

“A better comparison would be the catastrophic effects of demolishing Hetch Hetchy and draining a century-old lake,” he said, “which really would be a disaster for the economy and the environment.”

Filleted: With the help of friends, a gay South Bay couple has at least temporarily blocked the very Christian-minded Chick-fil-A chicken chain from opening an outlet in Mountain View.

City bureaucrats had recently issued a routine zoning variance to allow a Chick-fil-A franchise to be built on busy El Camino Real.

But David Speakman and his husband, Richard, of Mountain View – who in 2008 became the first gay couple in Santa Clara County to marry – had a bone to pick.

They didn’t like the company’s reputation for being antigay. The Georgia-based chain’s president did nothing to dispel that reputation recently when he defended “biblical principles,” including traditional marriage.

So David Speakman made an Internet appeal for the $1,000 needed to bring a zoning challenge before the Mountain View City Council – and within 14 hours, more than enough money had rolled in from donors.

That put Chick-fil-A on ice at least until September. In a statement, the company reaffirmed its “biblically based principles” but said it treats everyone – gay or straight – equally and with respect.

“It could be Mother Teresa that owns it, and it would be a bad place,” Speakman said, citing traffic and other concerns. “But because it was a bunch of bigots, it gave us an extra nudge.”

San Francisco Chronicle columnists Phillip Matier and Andrew Ross appear Sundays, Mondays and Wednesdays. Matier can be seen on the KPIX-TV morning and evening news. He can also be heard on KCBS radio Monday through Friday at 7:50 a.m. and 5:50 p.m. Got a tip? Call (415) 777-8815, or e-mail matierandross@sfchronicle.com.

Article source: http://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/matier-ross/article/Bay-Area-faces-new-high-speed-rail-costs-3726796.php