SAN FRANCISCO — A wealthy San Francisco couple notched a record nearly half-million-dollar buyout to vacate their luxury apartment of three decades, underscoring the lengths some landlords will go to to get rid of long-term tenants in a city with strict rent control and soaring market rents.
The $475,000 voluntary buyout is considered to be the largest in city history and reflects the high-value of the apartment. The tenants, a couple in their 60s with teenage children, had been paying $12,500 a month recently for a seven-bed, eight-bath apartment. It takes up most of a floor in a century-old building with expansive views of the bay, Golden Gate Bridge and nearby Presidio park. They declined to be named.
San Francisco has among the strongest tenant protections in the country, which encourages tenants to hang on to apartments as market prices go up. While California has recently adopted rent control and other tenant protections, San Francisco approved its rent control ordinance back in 1979 as a way to alleviate the city’s housing crisis.
That means landlords can only raise rent on some properties a certain amount each year, with the current increase pegged at under 1%. Landlords cannot evict tenants without just cause, such as nonpayment of rent. Owners who want to move into their own single-family home must pay tenants to vacate. The maximum amount tenants in one unit can receive to relocate is $22,000, with an extra $5,000 for households with minor children or seniors 60 and up.
In this case, relocation costs did not apply; the landlord and renters reached a voluntary agreement for them to leave.
Steven Adair MacDonald, the lawyer who represents the couple, said reaction has been divided to a six-figure buyout that’s enough to purchase a home in most parts of the country.
“Landlord attorneys think it’s an outrage, and on the tenant side, everybody’s excited, they think it’s great,” he said. But MacDonald thinks the landlord is the winner, as he will be able to rent the apartment for $25,000 a month and recoup the buyout amount in just over three years.
“After that, it will be gravy, so it’s a great investment,” said MacDonald.
MacDonald is also suing the landlord, Friedman Properties, on behalf of “fairly well-heeled” tenants in nine other units who have moved out since March, unable to bear the constant noise and dust from ongoing renovations in the building.
Marty Friedman, listed as the company’s authorized agent, did not respond to a phone call requesting comment. His attorney, David Wasserman, did not immediately respond to an email.
The Financial Times was first to report the agreement.
More than 300 tenant buyouts were filed with the San Francisco Rent Board in 2020. MacDonald said average buyouts are $50,000, and they are growing given the difference between market rent and length of tenant residency.
San Francisco rents declined during the pandemic, but still remain among the highest in the country. The average rent for a one-bedroom unit is $2,750, according to rental platform Zumper. The median sales price for a home is $1.5 million, according to Redfin.
Tenants groups say that without rent control, poor and working class residents would be driven out of San Francisco, unable to keep up with market rate rents.
Charley Goss, who handles government affairs for the San Francisco Apartment Association, said landlords accept that rent control is a part of doing business in the city. But there are situations where wealthier tenants hang on to a rent-controlled apartment, he said. The association represents about 4,500 landlords.
“Paying a half-million dollars to a wealthy person who’s been keeping a rent-controlled apartment in a city with a housing shortage and an affordability crisis kind of speaks to the way in which our local rent control distorts the market,” he said.
The video in the media player above is from a previous report.